This study examines how journalists are grappling with platform migration following Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitterin October 2022. Using a mixed-method approach that combines computational analysis of the activities of 861 journalists on Twitter and Mastodon with qualitative interviews of 11 active journalists, this study aims to (1) examine the extent to which journalists have exhibited different forms of Twitter disengagement post-acquisition; (2) identify the motivating and discouraging factors influencing their move, guided by the push-pull-mooring model; and (3) explore how journalists managed their online presence across platforms. The results indicated minimal Twitter non-use following Musk’s takeover, and full migration was not observed within a 6-month post-acquisition period. Factors such as the flood of fake news and the loss of the blue-tick verification served as push factors, while the appeal of Mastodon’s enhanced user control and stronger community values acted as pull factors. However, the practical reliance on Twitter’s functionalities, audience base, and professional obligations made total abandonment challenging.
AbbingRRGehlRW (2024) Shifting your research from X to Mastodon? Here’s what you need to know. Patterns5(1): 100914.
2.
ArreseAAlbarranAB (2003) Time and Media Markets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
3.
BaumerEPSAdamsPKhovanskayaVD, et al (2013) Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing. In: CHI ‘13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, 27 April–2 May, pp. 3257–3266. New York: ACM.
4.
BentivegnaSMarchettiR (2017) Journalists at a crossroads: are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter?Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism19(2): 270–290.
BossioDHoltonAE (2018) The identity dilemma: identity drivers and social media fatigue among journalists. Popular Communication16(4): 248–262.
7.
boydd (2011) White flight in networked publics? How race and class shaped American teen engagement with Myspace and Facebook. In: NakamuraLChow-WhiteP (eds) In Race After the Internet. New York: Routledge, pp. 203–222.
8.
ChandrasekharanEGlynnAEisensteinJ, et al (2017) You can’t stay here: the efficacy of Reddit’s 2015 ban examined through hate speech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction1: 31.
9.
ChangI-CLiuC-CChenK (2013) The push, pull and mooring effects in virtual migration for social networking sites. Information Systems Journal24(4): 323–346.
EdwardsEJBoellstorffT (2020) Migration, non-use, and the “Tumblrpocalypse”: towards a unified theory of digital exodus. Media, Culture & Society43(3): 016344372096846.
13.
FerrierMGarud-PatkarN (2018) TrollBusters: fighting online harassment of women journalists. In: VickeryJEverbachT (eds) Mediating Misogyny. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 311–332.
14.
FieslerCDymB (2020) Moving across lands: online platform migration in fandom communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4(CSCW1): 1–25.
GrandhiSAPlotnickLHiltzSR (2019) Do I stay or do I go? Motivations and decision making in social media non-use and reversion. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3: 1–27.
19.
HeJZiaHBCastroI, et al (2023) Flocking to Mastodon: tracking the great Twitter migration. In: IMC ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM on internet measurement conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 24–26 October, pp. 111–123. New York: ACM.
MarwickAboydd (2011) To see and be seen: celebrity practice on twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17(2): 139–158.
NgYMM (2020) Re-examining the innovation post-adoption process: the case of Twitter discontinuance. Computers in Human Behavior103: 48–56.
35.
NgYMM (2023) Twitter intermittent and permanent discontinuance: a multi-method approach to study innovation diffusion. Computers in Human Behavior138: 107482.
36.
ParkJ-H (2014) The effects of personalization on user continuance in social networking sites. Information Processing & Management50(3): 462–475.
RogersEMShoemakerFF (1971) Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach (Ed.gov). New York: The Free Press. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED065999
41.
SaltonGBuckleyC (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management24(5): 513–523.
42.
SatchellCDourishP (2009) Beyond the user. In: OZCHI ‘09:Proceedings of the 21st annual conference of the Australian computer-human interaction special interest group on design: open 24/7, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 23–27 November, pp. 9–16. New York: ACM.
SwasyA (2016) A little birdie told me: factors that influence the diffusion of Twitter in newsrooms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(4): 643–656.
45.
TandocECJrVosTP (2016) The journalist is marketing the news: social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice10(8): 950–966.
46.
UsherNNgYMM (2020) Sharing knowledge and “microbubbles”: epistemic communities and insularity in US political journalism. Social Media + Society6(2): 205630512092663.
47.
WähnerMDeubelABreuerJ, et al (2024) “Don’t research us”—how Mastodon instance rules connect to research ethics. Publizistik69(3): 357–380.
48.
WalkerWRSkowronskiJJ (2009) The fading affect bias: but what the hell is it for?Applied Cognitive Psychology23(8): 1122–1136.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
