Platform designers create and implement incentive systems to encourage users to contribute content to online communities. This article examines the effect of a multidimensional incentive hierarchy in motivating users to engage in competitive and prosocial activities. Utilizing an external change observed in the data science community, Kaggle, and applying a quasi-experimental design, we compared users’ engagement levels before and after introducing a multidimensional incentive hierarchy. We found that implementing a multidimensional incentive system directed users from submitting answers to Kaggle competitions to participating in Kaggle’s online forum discussions. However, our additional analyses suggest that the most and the least motivated users may be less likely to be impacted by such incentives.
AartsHVerplankenBVan KnippenbergA (1998) Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit?Journal of Applied Social Psychology28(15): 1355–1374.
2.
AdlerNEEpelESCastellazzoG, et al. (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology19(6): 586–592.
3.
AntelmiAMalandrinoDScaranoV (2019) Characterizing the behavioral evolution of twitter users and the truth behind the 90-9-1 rule. In: Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, San Francisco, CA, 13 May, pp. 1035–1038. New York: ACM. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3308560.3316705 (accessed 29 August 2023).
4.
Baeza-YatesRSaez-TrumperD (2015) Wisdom of the crowd or wisdom of a few? An analysis of users’ content generation. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM conference on hypertext & social media—HT ’15, Guzelyurt, 1–4 September, pp. 69–74. New York: ACM. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03044 (accessed 29 August 2023).
5.
BaliettiSRiedlC (2021) Incentives, competition, and inequality in markets for creative production. Research Policy50(4): 104212.
6.
BantelKAJacksonSE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?Strategic Management Journal10: 107–124.
7.
BarclayPWillerR (2007) Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences274(1610): 749–753.
8.
BénabouRTiroleJ (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review96(5): 1652–1678.
9.
BenderskyCPaiJ (2018) Status dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior5(1): 183–199.
10.
BoekerW (1997) Strategic change: the influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal40(1): 152–170.
11.
BurtchGHeQHongY, et al. (2022) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from reddit. Management Science68: 3175–3973.
12.
BurtchGHongYBapnaR, et al. (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Science64(5): 2065–2082.
13.
ChenLBairdAStraubD (2022) The impact of hierarchical privilege levels and non-hierarchical incentives on continued contribution in online Q&A communities: a motivational model of gamification goals. Decision Support Systems153: 113667.
14.
ChoiH-SLevineJM (2004) Minority influence in work teams: the impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology40(2): 273–280.
15.
ElliotA. J.FalerJ.McGregorH. A.CampbellW. K.SedikidesC.HarackiewiczJM (2000). Competence Valuation as a Strategic Intrinsic Motivation Process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7): 780–794.
16.
ElliotA. J.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5): 968–980.
17.
FarzanRBrusilovskyP (2011) Encouraging user participation in a course recommender system: an impact on user behavior. Computers in Human Behavior27(1): 276–284.
18.
FetchenhauerDBuunkBFlacheA, et al. (2006) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
19.
GallusJ (2017) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: a large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Science63(12): 3999–4015.
20.
GoesPBGuoCLinM (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Information Systems Research27(3): 497–516.
21.
GriskeviciusVTyburJMVan den BerghB (2010) Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(3): 392–404.
22.
HamariJ (2017) Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior71: 469–478.
23.
HansenTLevineJM (2009) Newcomers as change agents: effects of newcomers’ behavioral style and teams’ performance optimism. Social Influence4(1): 46–61.
24.
HsiehGKrautREHudsonSE (2010) Why pay? Exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI ’10, Atlanta, GA, 10–15 April, pp. 305–314. New York: ACM. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1753326.1753373 (accessed 6 July 2022).
25.
Khern-am-nuaiWKannanKGhasemkhaniH (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Information Systems Research29(4): 871–892.
26.
LampelJBhallaA (2007) The role of status seeking in online communities: giving the gift of experience. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication12(2): 434–455.
27.
LaRoseREastinMS (2004) A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media48(3): 358–377.
28.
LeeDSLemieuxT (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature48(2): 281–355.
29.
Lev-OnA (2015) Equalization of what? Status, expertise, and tenure in virtual communities of practice. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance39(2): 152–161.
30.
LiangHWangM-MWangJ-J, et al. (2018) How intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives affect task effort in crowdsourcing contests: a mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior81: 168–176.
31.
LimYVan Der HeideB (2015) Evaluating the wisdom of strangers: the perceived credibility of online consumer reviews on yelp. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(1): 67–82.
32.
LindenbergS (2006) Prosocial behavior, solidarity, and framing processes. In: FetchenhauerDFlacheABuunkB, et al. (eds) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives (Critical Issues in Social Justice). Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 23–44.
33.
LiuXSchuckertMLawR (2016) Online incentive hierarchies, review extremity, and review quality: empirical evidence from the hotel sector. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing33(3): 279–292.
34.
LockeEALathamGP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist57(9): 705–717.
35.
MageeJCGalinskyAD (2008) 8 social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals2(1): 351–398.
36.
PettitNCMarrJC (2020) A trajectories based perspective on status dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology33: 233–237.
37.
PettitNCYongKSpataroSE (2010) Holding your place: reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology46(2): 396–401.
38.
PhangCWKankanhalliATanBCY (2015) What motivates contributors vs. lurkers? An investigation of online feedback forums. Information Systems Research26(4): 773–792.
39.
QiaoDLeeS-YWhinstonAB, et al. (2020) Financial incentives dampen altruism in online prosocial contributions: a study of online reviews. Information Systems Research31(4): 1361–1375.
40.
RestivoMVan de RijtA (2014) No praise without effort: experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community. Information, Communication & Society17(4): 451–462.
41.
RidgewayCL (1982) Status in groups: the importance of motivation. American Sociological Review47(1): 76–88.
42.
RyanRMDeciEL (2000) When rewards compete with nature: the undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In: SansoneCHarackiewiczJM (eds) Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivation: The Search For Optimal Motivation And Performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 13–54.
43.
SipleyG (2022) Lurking as literacy practice: a uses and gratifications study in neighborhood Facebook groups. New Media & Society.
44.
StragierJVan den AbeeleMMechantP, et al. (2016) Understanding persistence in the use of online fitness communities: comparing novice and experienced users. Computers in Human Behavior64: 34–42.
45.
SunNRauPP-LMaL (2014) Understanding lurkers in online communities: a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior38: 110–117.
46.
TengC-IHuangT-LLiaoG-Y, et al. (2022) Administrator-users contribute more to online communities. Information & Management59(8): 103717.
