Indicators of collective user behavior and opinion are increasingly common features of online news stories and may include information about how the story made users feel. An experiment (N = 298) examined the effects of the presence and valence of a “mood meter” posted alongside an online human-interest story on memory for, attitude toward, emotional response to, and intentions to share the story. The presence of a mood meter led to lower recall of story content, more negative attitudes toward the story, and less positive emotional responses. The results suggest that participating in a mood meter may attenuate positive responses to human-interest stories.
AustCFZillmannD (1996) Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73: 787–803.
2.
BergerJMilkmanKL (2012) What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research49: 192–205.
3.
BiswasRRiffeDZillmannD (1994) Mood influence on the appeal of bad news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly71: 689–696.
4.
BowerGH (1981) Mood and memory. American Psychologist36: 129–148.
5.
BucyEP (2004) Second generation net news: interactivity and information accessibility in the online environment. JMM: The International Journal on Media Management6: 102–113.
6.
BuhrmesterMKwangTGoslingSD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science6: 3–5.
7.
CarrCTVitakJMcLaughlinC (2013) Strength of social cues in online impression formation: expanding SIDE research. Communication Research40: 261–281.
8.
CavanaughLABettmanJRLuceMF. (2007) Appraising the appraisal-tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology17: 169–173.
9.
DamasioAR (2006) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. London: Vintage.
10.
DillardJPShenL (2007) Self-report measures of discrete emotions. In: ReynoldsRAWoodsRBakerJD (eds) Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference, pp. 330–333.
11.
EaglyAHChaikenS (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12.
FineGAWhiteRD (2002) Creating collective attention in the public domain: human interest narratives and the rescue of Floyd Collins. Social Forces81: 57–85.
13.
GardnerMP (1985) Mood states and consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research12: 281–300.
14.
GibsonRZillmannD (1994) Exaggerated versus representative exemplification in news reports perception of issues and personal consequences. Communication Research21: 603–624.
15.
GildeZúñigaHJungNValenzuelaS (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17: 319–336.
16.
GrabeMELangAZhaoX (2003) News content and form: implications for memory and audience evaluations. Communication Research30: 387–413.
17.
HaidtJ (2003a) Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In: KeyesCLMHaidtJ (eds) Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 275–289.
18.
HaidtJ (2003b) The moral emotions. In: DavidsonRJSchererKRGoldsmithHH (eds) Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 852–870.
19.
HatfieldECacioppoJTRapsonRL (1993) Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science2: 96–99.
20.
HuangL-SChuoY-JLanI-T (2007) Effects of perceived risk, message types, and reading motives on the acceptance and transmission of electronic word-of-mouth communication. Contemporary Management Research3: 299–312.
21.
HughesHM (1940) News and the Human Interest Story. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
22.
HutchersonCAGoldinPROchsnerKN. (2005) Attention and emotion: does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films?NeuroImage27: 656–668.
LangA (2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication50: 46–70.
25.
LeDouxJE (1996) The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28: 331–339.
27.
LeeE-J (2006) When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication?Communication Research33: 423–447.
28.
LevineLJPizarroDA (2004) Emotion and memory research: a grumpy overview. Social Cognition22: 530–554.
29.
MonahanJL (1995) Thinking positively: using positive affect when designing health messages. In: MaibachEWParrottR (eds) Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 81–98.
30.
MyrickJGOliverMB (2015) Laughing and crying: mixed emotions, compassion, and the effectiveness of a YouTube PSA about skin cancer. Health Communication30: 820–829.
31.
NabiRL (2003) Exploring the framing effects of emotion. Communication Research30: 224–247.
32.
NeumannRStrackF (2000) “Mood contagion”: the automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79: 211–223.
33.
NummenmaaLGlereanEViinikainenM. (2012) Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America109: 9599–9604.
34.
OliverMBAshEWoolleyJK (2013) The experience of elevation: responses to media portrayals of moral beauty. In: TamboriniR (ed.) Media and the Moral Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–108.
35.
OliverMBDillardJPBaeK. (2012a) The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly89: 205–224.
36.
OliverMBHartmannTWoolleyJK (2012b) Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research38: 360–378.
37.
PettyREFabrigarLRWegenerDT (2003) Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In: DavidsonRJSchererKRGoldsmithHH (eds) Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 752–772.
38.
PostmesTSpearsRLeaM (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries?: SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research25: 689–715.
39.
PostmesTSpearsRSakhelK. (2001) Social influence in computer-mediated communication: the effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 1243–1254.
40.
ScheierMFCarverCS (1977) Self-focused attention and the experience of emotion: attraction, repulsion, elation, and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology35: 625–636.
41.
SemetkoHAValkenburgPM (2000) Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication50: 93–109.
42.
SilviaPJ (2002) Self-awareness and emotional intensity. Cognition and Emotion16: 195–216.
43.
SmallDAVerrochiNM (2009) The face of need: facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research46: 777–787.
44.
SnyderM (1974) Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology30: 526–537.
45.
SnyderM (1987) Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring. New York: W. H. Freeman.
46.
SnyderMGangestadS (1986) On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 125–139.
47.
SundarSSNassC (2001) Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication51: 52–72.
48.
Tampa Bay Times (2014) Tampa Bay, Florida news—Tampa Bay Times/St. Pete Times. Available at: http://www.tampabay.com
ThurmanN (2008) Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society10: 139–157.
51.
WaltherJBDeAndreaDKimJ. (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research36: 469–492.
52.
WaltherJBLiangYGansterT. (2012) Online reviews, helpfulness ratings, and consumer attitudes: an extension of congruity theory to multiple sources in web 2.0. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication18: 97–112.
53.
WangZWaltherJBHancockJT (2009) Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: what you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research35: 59–85.
54.
ZajoncRB (1980) Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist35: 151–175.
55.
ZillmannDBrosiusH-B (2000) Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
ZillmannDBryantJ (1985) Selective Exposure to Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
