Mainstream media messages contain limited, distorted and negative images of Native Americans, thus promoting continued ethnic marginalization. Community-oriented online venues like the viral video sites have opened up new platforms for depiction. This study employed a quantitative content analysis to examine a sample of YouTube videos relating to Native Americans. The findings reveal a number of promising patterns, suggesting that messages broadcast by viral video sites may depart from the rigid stereotypical depictions of Native Americans in traditional media.
88to24.org (2009) Yéégó 24 Navajo nation government reform: Multimedia. Available at: http://www.88to24.org/multimedia/video
2.
Abrams JR ( 2008) African Americans’ television activity: Is it related to perceptions of outgroup vitality? Howard Journal of Communications19(1): 1-17.
3.
Abrams JR and Giles H. ( 2007) Ethnic identity gratifications selection and avoidance by African Americans: A group vitality and social identity gratifications perspective. Media Psychology9(1): 115-34.
4.
Abrams JR and Giles H.(2009) Hispanic television activity: Is it related to vitality perceptions ? Communication Research Reports26(3): 247-52.
5.
Abrams JR, Eveland WP and Giles H. ( 2003) The effects of television on group vitality: Can television empower nondominant groups? Communication Yearbook27: 193-219.
6.
Allen RL and Bielby WT ( 1979) Blacks’ attitudes and behaviors toward television . Communication Research6(4): 437-62.
7.
Anderson C. ( 2003) American Indian tribal websites: A review and comparison . Electronic Library21(5): 450-5.
8.
Arrington M. ( 2009) YouTube video streams top 1.2 billion/day. TechCrunch. Available at: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/09/youtube-video-streams-top-1-billionday/
9.
Bartsch R., Burnetts R., Diller T. and Rankin-Williams E. ( 2000) Gender representation in television commercials: Updating an update. Sex Roles43(9/10): 363-89.
10.
Bataille GM and Silet CLP ( 1980) The Pretend Indians: Images of Native Americans in the Movies. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
11.
Baumer S. ( 2007) YouTube vs mainstream media: Kissing cousins of feuding siblings?Flow5. Available at: http://flowtv.org/?p=100
12.
Bird ES ( 1999) Gendered construction of the American Indian in popular media. Journal of Communication49(3): 61-83.
13.
Bureau of Indian Affairs (2008) Indian entities recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. Federal Register74: 40218-23. Available at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/biaind.pdf
14.
Campbell CP ( 1995) Race, Myth, and the News. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Cheng X., Dale C. and Liu J. ( 2007) Understanding the characteristics of internet short video sharing: Youtube as a case study. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement: 1-9.
16.
Children Now ( 2003) Fall colors: Prime time diversity report, 2003. Available at: http://www.childrennow.org/uploads/documents/fall_colors_2003.pdf
17.
Coleman CL ( 1996) A war of words: How news frames define legitimacy in a native conflict. In: Bird E (ed.) Dressing in Feathers: The Construction of the Indian in American Popular Culture . Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 181-93.
18.
Coward JM ( 1999) The Newspaper Indian: Native American Identity in the Press 1820-90. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19.
Cuillier D. and Ross SD ( 2007) Gambling with identity: Self-representation of American Indians on official tribal websites. Howard Journal of Communications18(3): 197-219.
20.
Curtin PA ( 1995) From pity to necessity: How national events shaped coverage of the Plains Indian war. American Journalism: A Journal of Media History12: 3-21.
21.
DeNavas-Walt C., Proctor DB and Lee CH ( 2005) Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf
22.
Derounian-Stodola KZ (ed.) (1999) Women’s Indian Captivity Narratives. London: Penguin.
23.
DiMaggio P. and Hargittai E. ( 2001) From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper Series 15. Available at: http://www.web-use.umd.edu/webshop/resources/Dimaggio_Digital_Divide.pdf
24.
Ferguson DA and Perse EM ( 2000) The world wide web as a functional alternative to television . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44(2): 155-74.
25.
Frazier I. ( 2001) On the Rez. New York: Picador.
26.
Freeman B. and Chapman S. ( 2007) Is YouTube telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the Youtube video sharing website. Tobacco Control16: 207-10.
27.
Friar RE and Friar NA ( 1972) The Only Good Indian … The Hollywood Gospel . New York: Drama Book Specialists .
28.
Gerbner G. and Gross L. ( 1976) Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication26(2): 172-99.
29.
Gerbner G., Gross L., Signorielli N. and Morgan M. ( 1990) Aging with television: Images on television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication30(1): 37-48.
30.
Gerbner G., Morgan M., Gross L., Signorielli N. and Shanahan J. ( 2002) Growing up with television: Cultivation processes . In: Bryant J and Zillmann D (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 43-68.
31.
Giles H., Bourhis R. and Taylor D. ( 1977) Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations . In: Giles H (ed.) Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 307-48.
Green MK ( 1993) Images of native Americans in advertising: Some moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics12(4): 323-30.
34.
Greenberg BS and Worrell T. ( 2007) New faces on television: A 12-season replication . Howard Journal of Communications18(4): 277-90.
35.
Greenberg BS, Mastro D. and Brand JE ( 2002) Minorities and the mass media: television into the 21st century. In: Bryant J and Zillman D (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 333-51.
36.
Hargittai E. ( 2003) Second level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday7. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/-index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/942/864#h1
37.
Harrell DE, Gaustad ES, Boles JB, Griffith SF, Miller RR and Woods RB ( 2005) Unto a Good Land: A History of the American People, Vol. 1 1900. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans.
38.
Harris RJ ( 2002) A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Harwood J. and Anderson K. ( 2002) The presence and portrayal of social groups on prime time television. Communication Reports15(2): 81-97.
40.
Harwood J. and Roy A. ( 2005) Social identity theory and mass communication research . In: Harwood J and Giles H (eds) Intergroup Communication . New York: Peter Lang, 189-211.
41.
Harwood J., Giles H. and Bourhis R. ( 1994) The genesis of vitality theory: Historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of Sociology and Language108: 167-206.
42.
Heider D. ( 2000) White News: Why Local News Programs Don’t Cover People of Color. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Jojola T. ( 2003) Absurd reality II: Hollywood goes to the Indians . In: Rollins PC and O’Connor JE (eds) Hollywood’s Indian: The Portrayal of the Native American in Filsm. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 12-26.
44.
Kasdan M. and Tavernetti S. ( 1993) The Hollywood Indian in Little Big Man: A revisionist view. Film and History23: 70-80.
45.
Kiecolt KJ and Sayles M. ( 1988) Television and the cultivation of attitudes toward subordinated groups. Sociological Spectrum8(1): 19-33.
46.
Kilpatrick J. ( 1999) Celluloid Indians: Native Americans and Film. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press .
47.
Krippendorff K. ( 2004) Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research3(3): 411-33.
48.
Landry R. and Allard R. ( 1992) Ethnolinguistic vitality and the bilingual development of minority and majority group students. In: Fase W, Jaespaert K and Kroon S (eds) Maintenance and Loss of Minority Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 223-51.
49.
Lange P. ( 2008) Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication13(1): 361-80.
50.
Larson MS ( 2002) Race and interracial relationships in children’s television commercials. Howard Journal of Communications13(3): 223-35.
51.
Larson SG ( 2006) Media and Minorities: The Politics of Race in News and Entertainment. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
52.
Manchel F. ( 1998) Cultural confusion: Broken Arrow (1950). In: Rollins PC and O’Connor JE (eds) Hollywood’s Indian: The Portrayal of the Native American in Film. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 91-106.
53.
Mares ML ( 1996) The role of source confusions in television’s cultivation of social reality judgments. Human Communication Research23(2): 278-97.
54.
Martindale C. ( 1997) Only in glimpses: Portrayal of America’s largest minority groups by the New York Times, 1934-1994. In: Biagi S and Kern-Foxworth M (eds) Facing Difference: Race, Gender, and Mass Media . Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 89-95.
55.
Marubbio ME ( 2006) Killing the Indian Maiden: Images of Native American Women in Film. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
56.
Mastro DE and Greenberg BS ( 2000) The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television . Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media44(4): 690-703.
57.
Mastro DE and Kopacz M. ( 2006) Media representations of race, prototypicality, and policy reasoning: An application of self-categorization theory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media50(2): 305-22.
58.
Mastro DE and Stern SR ( 2003) Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of primetime advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media47(4): 638-47.
59.
Merskin D. ( 1998) Sending up signals: A survey of Native American media use and representation in the mass media. Howard Journal of Communications9(4): 333-45.
60.
Mitten L. ( 2003) Indians on the internet: Selected NativeAmerican websites. Electronic Library21(5): 443-9.
61.
Morris TL and Meinrath SD ( 2009) New media, technology, and internet use in Indian country: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. Available at: http://oti.-newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/New_Media_Technology_and_Internet_Use_in_Indian_Country.pdf
62.
Neville HA, Lilly RL, Duran G., Lee RM and Browne L. ( 2000) Construction and initial validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology47(1): 59-70.
63.
Nielsen Online (2008) Nielsen Online reports topline US data for July, 2008. Available at: http://www.nielsen-online.com/pr/pr_080812.pdf
64.
O’Connor JE ( 1993) The white man’s Indian. Film and History23: 17-26.
65.
Ogunwole SU ( 2002) The American Indian and Alaska native population: 2000 . Census 2000 Brief. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/c2kbr01-15.pdf
66.
Oliver JE and Mendelberg T. ( 2000) Reconsidering the environmental determinants of white racial attitudes. American Journal of Political Science44(3): 574-89.
67.
Pan Z. and Kosicki GM ( 1996) Assessing news media influences on the formation of whites’ racial policy preferences. Communication Research23(2): 147-78.
68.
Poindexter PM, Smith L. and Heider D. ( 2003) Race and ethnicity in local television news: Framing, story assignments, and source selections. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media47(4): 524-36.
69.
Power J., Murphy S. and Coover G. ( 1996) Priming prejudice: How stereotypes and counterstereotypes influence attribution of responsibility and credibility among ingroups and outgroups. Human Communication Research23(1): 36-58.
70.
Quantcast (2009) YouTube.com: US demographics. Available at: http://www.quantcast.com/youtube.com
71.
Rivadeneyra R., Ward LM and Gordon M. ( 2007) Distorted reflections: Media exposure and Latino adolescents’ conceptions of self. Media Psychology9(2): 261-90.
72.
Sachdev I. and Bourhis RY ( 1993) Ethnolinguistic vitality: Some motivational and cognitive considerations. In: Hogg M and Abrams D (eds) Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf , 33-51.
73.
Screen Actors Guild (2007) A different America on screen but latest casting data report shows some under-represented groups making gains. Screen Actor. Available at: http://www.sag.org/files/documents/CastingDataReport.pdf
74.
Shumway MJ and Jackson RH ( 1995) Native American population patterns. Geographical Review85: 185-202.
75.
Signorielli N. and Bacue A. ( 1999) Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles40(7/8): 527-44.
76.
Sutton CT and Broken Nose MA ( 1996) American Indian families: An overview. In: McGoldrick M, Giordano J and Pearce J (eds) Ethnicity and Family Therapy (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Press , 31-44.
77.
Tan A., Fujioka Y. and Lucht N. ( 1997) Native American stereotypes, TV portrayals, and personal contact. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly74(2): 265-84.
78.
Tan AS and Tan G. ( 1979) Television use and self-esteem of blacks. Journal of Communication29(1): 129-35.
79.
Thornton R. ( 1990) American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History since 1492. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
80.
Tropp LA and Wright SC ( 2001) Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(5): 585-600.
81.
Tuchman G. ( 1978) Symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media . In: Tuchman G, Daniels AK and Benet J (eds) Hearth and Home: Images of Women in the Mass Media. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-38.
82.
US Census Bureau (2005) Facts for features: American Indian and Alaska native heritage month: November, 2005. Available at: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www./releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/005684.html
83.
US Census Bureau (2009) National population projections. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www./projections/2009cnmsSumTabs.html
84.
US Department of Commerce (2004) A nation online: Entering the broadband age. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/anol/NationOnlineBroadband-04.htm
85.
Valentino NA ( 2001) The mass media and group priming in American elections . In: Hart RP and Shaw DR (eds) Communication in US Elections: New Agendas. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 145-84.
86.
Vorderer P., Klimmt C. and Ritterfeld U. ( 2004) Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment . Communication Theory14(4): 388-408.
87.
Wesch M. ( 2008) Digital ethnography: YouTube statistics. Available at: http://www.ksudigg.wet-paint.com
88.
Yellow Bird M (1999) What we want to be called: Indigenous peoples’ perspectives on racial and ethnic identity labels. American Indian Quarterly23: 1-23.
89.
YouTube (2008) Terms of use. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/t/terms
90.
YouTube (2009) YouTube glossary: Featured videos. Available at: http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=143421
