Where translation impacts: The non-professional community on Chinese online social media – A descriptive case study on the user-generated translation activity of Bilibili content creators
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2021
Where translation impacts: The non-professional community on Chinese online social media – A descriptive case study on the user-generated translation activity of Bilibili content creators
This study explored the user-generated translation activity in the context of the Chinese online social media. It focused on Bilibili content creators dedicated to translating public comments on China-related videos posted on international social media platforms such as YouTube, and creating videos featuring Chinese translated comments. Viewing their translation actions as events in a collective activity system, the authors collected data from 30 participants through a questionnaire and follow-up interviews with two participants who have recently worked on videos about China’s fight against Covid-19. All the data were analysed by using Engeström’s activity theory model to create an activity model showing how their user-generated translation activity was conducted. In this study, we observed that the participants, as the non-professional translation community on the Chinese online social media, were breaking down linguistic borders for fans and viewers, and postulated the possible interaction between the user-generated translation work and their better understanding of how the world saw China through grassroots expression of opinions.
AntoniniR.BucariaC. (2015). Non-professional interpreting and translation in the media. Peter Lang.
2.
AustermühlF. (2011). On clouds and crowds: Current developments in translation technology. Translation in Transition, 9, 1–27.
3.
BakerM.BlaagaardB. (2016). Reconceptualizing citizen media: A preliminary charting of a complex domain. In BakerM.BlaagaardB. (Eds.), Citizen media and public spaces: Diverse expressions of citizenship and dissent (1–22). Routledge.
4.
Bélair-GagnonV.AndersonC. W. (2015). Citizen media and journalism. In AngP. H.MansellR. (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of digital communication and society (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons.
5.
CaoY. (2018). Crowdsourcing translation in contemporary China: Theories and practices. In ChanS.-W. (Ed.), The human factor in machine translation (pp. 236–254). Routledge.
6.
ChenZ. T. (2020). Slice of life in a live and wired masquerade: Playful prosumption as identity work and performance in an identity college Bilibili. Global Media and China, 5(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436420952026
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
9.
CroninM. (2013). Translation in the digital age. Routledge.
10.
DanielA.FlewT.SpurgeonC. L. (2009, July). Consumer trends in digital news and information in Australia. In Communication, creativity and global citizenship: Refereed proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communication Association conference’2009 (pp. 562–580). Australian and New Zealand Communication Association.
DesjardinsR. (2017). Translation and social media. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DesjardinsR. (2019). A preliminary theoretical investigation into [online] social self-translation: The real, the illusory, and the hyperreal. Translation Studies, 12(2), 156–176.
14.
Díaz-CintasJ.SánchezP. M. (2006). Fansubs: Audiovisual translation in an amateur environment. The Journal of Specialized Translation, 6, 37–52.
15.
DwyerT. (2012). Fansub dreaming on ViKi: ‘Don’t just watch but help when you are free’. The Translator, 18(2), 217–243.
16.
DwyerT. (2017). Speaking in subtitles: Revaluing screen translation. Edinburgh University Press.
17.
EngeströmY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit
18.
EngeströmY. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19(38), 19–30.
19.
EngeströmY. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
20.
FlewT. (2008). New Media: An introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
21.
FolaronD. (2020). Technology, technical translation and localization. In O’HaganM. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of translation and technology (pp. 203–219). Routledge.
22.
GilardiF.WhiteA.ChengS.ShengJ.SongW.ZhaoY. (2020). How online video platforms could support China’s independent microfilm (short film) makers and enhance the Chinese film industry. Cultural Trends, 29(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1697852
23.
HuK. (2012). Chinese subtitle groups and the neoliberal work ethic. In OtmazginN.Ben-AriE. (Eds.), Popular culture collaborations and co-productions in east and southeast Asia (pp. 207–232). Singapore University Press.
24.
HuM.ZhangM.LuoN. (2016). Understanding participation on video sharing communities: The role of self-construal and community interactivity. Computers in Human Behaviour, 62, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.077
25.
Jiménez-CrespoM. A. (2020). Technology and non-professional translation. In O’HaganM. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of translation and technology (pp. 239–254). Routledge.
26.
KungS.-W. (2016). Audienceship and community of practice: An exploratory study of Chinese fansubbing communities. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies, 3(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23306343.2016.1225329
27.
LeontievA. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality (HallM. J., Trans.). Prentice Hall.
LinJ.de KloetJ. (2019). Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883430
30.
LinK. (2002). Translation as a catalyst for social change in China. In TymoczkoM.GentzlerE. (Eds.), Translation and power (pp. 160–183). University of Massachusetts Press.
31.
LiuN. X. (2019). News framing through English-Chinese translation: A comparative study of Chinese and English media discourse. Routledge.
32.
LvY.LiM. (2015). On the new features of online film and TV subtitle translation in China. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(6), 122–127.
33.
O’HaganM. (2009). Evolution of user-generated translation: Fansubs, translation hacking and crowd sourcing. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization, 1(1), 94–121.
34.
O’HaganM. (2011). Community translation: Translation as a social activity and its possible consequences in the advent of web 2.0 and beyond. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 10, 11–23.
35.
O’HaganM. (2012). Translation as the new game in the digital era. Translation Spaces, 1(1), 123–141.
36.
O’HaganM. (2017). Deconstructing translation crowdsourcing with the case of a Facebook initiative. In KennyD. (Ed.), Human issues in translation technology (pp. 25–44). Routledge
37.
Pérez-GonzálezL. (2006). Fansubbing anime: Insights into the butterfly effect of globalisation on audiovisual translation. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 14(4), 260–277.
38.
Pérez-GonzálezL. (2007). Intervention in new amateur subtitling cultures: A multimodal account. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 67–80.
39.
Pérez-GonzálezL. (2013). Co-creational subtitling in the digital media: Transformative and authorial practices. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(1), 3–21.
40.
Pérez-GonzálezL. (2014). Audiovisual translation: Theories, methods and issues. Routledge.
41.
Pérez-GonzálezL.Susam-SaraevaS. (2012). Non-professionals translating and interpreting participatory and engaged perspectives. Translator, 18(2), 149–165.
42.
PerrinoS. (2009). User-generated translation: The future of translation in a Web 2.0 environment. The Journal of Specialized Translation, 12, 55–78.
43.
PymA. (2011a). Translation research terms: A tentative glossary for moments of perplexity and dispute. In PymA. (Ed.), Translation research projects 3 (pp. 75–110). Intercultural Studies Group.
44.
PymA. (2011b). What technology does to translating. Translation and Interpreting, 3(1), 1–9.
45.
SanninoA.EngeströmY. (2018). Cultural-historical activity theory: Founding insights and new challenges. Cultural-historical Psychology, 14(3), 43–56.
46.
VygotskyL. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
47.
WangD. (2017). Fansubbing in China: With reference to the fansubbing group YYeTs. Jostrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation, 28, 165–190.
48.
WangD.ZhangX. (2016). Ideological manipulation of controversial information: The unusual case of the Chinese-subtitled version of House of Cards. Altre Modernità: Rivista di studi letterari e culturali [Special issue on ideological manipulation in audiovisual translation]. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/AMonline/article/view/6845
49.
WangD.ZhangX. (2017). Fansubbing in China: Technology-facilitated activism in translation. Target, 29(2), 301–318.
50.
WangK.FanS. (1999). Translation in China: A motivating force. Meta, 44(1), 7–26.
51.
WongsereeT. (2019). Understanding Thai fansubbing practices in the digital era: A network of fans and online technologies in fansubbing communities. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 1, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1639779
52.
YangY. (2019). Danmaku subtitling: An exploratory study of a new grassroots translation practice on Chinese video-sharing websites. Translation Studies, 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2019.1664318
53.
ZhaoE. J. (2016). Professionalization of amateur production in online screen entertainment in China: Hopes, frustrations and uncertainties. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5444–5462. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5727
