Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates the psychological impact of viewing user-generated content depicting extreme real-world violence. Eight threads were harvested from a publicly accessible online discussion forum in which people discussed their experiences of witnessing real-world torture, maiming or death online. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to systematically analyse these threads. The themes capture the contradictory ways in which people react to viewing extreme real-world violence online, with some finding it intensely distressing and others using it as a resource for psychological grounding or (perceived) strengthening. Based on this analysis, we highlight pathways that may lead to the cessation or continuation of viewing such content and argue that greater research on this seemingly common but under-studied experience is warranted.

Keywords

Extreme violence psychological distress qualitative research methods real-world violence social media user-generated content

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Clarke

(2019) Disgust, shame and the psychosocial impact of skin picking: evidence from an online support forum. Journal of Health Psychology 24(13): 1773–1784.

Anthony

Thomas

(2010) ‘This is citizen journalism at its finest’: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident. New Media and Society 12(8): 1280–1296.

Auxier

Anderson

(2021) Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Centre, 7 April. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/

Barrie

(2020) Searching racism after George Flloyd. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 6: 1–3.

Bender

Plante

Gentile

(2018) The effects of violent media content on aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology 19: 104–108.

Boyd

Swanson

(2016) The evolution of virtual violence: how mobile screens provide windows to real violence. Pediatrics 138(2): e20161358.

Braun

Clarke

(2013) Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE.

Braun

Clarke

(2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589–597.

Braun

Clarke

(2021a) One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18(3): 328–352.

10.

Braun

Clarke

(2021b) To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13(2): 201–216.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2022) Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology 9(1): 3–26.

12.

Braun

Clarke

Boulton

, et al. (2021) The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24(6): 641–654.

13.

British Psychological Society (BPS) (2021) Ethical guidelines for Internet-mediated research. Available at: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Internet-mediated%20Research.pdf

14.

Chassiakas

YLR

Radesky

Christakis

, et al. (2016) Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics 138(5): 01542.

15.

Colley

Moore

(2022) The challenges of studying 4chan and the Alt-Right: ‘come on in the water’s fine.’ New Media and Society 24(1): 5–30.

16.

Dempsey

McAlaney

Bewick

(2018) A critical appraisal of the social norms approach as an interventional strategy for health-related behavior and attitude change. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2180.

17.

Dhal

(2018) Exploitation on the Internet? The morality of watching death online. The Guardian, 12 October. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/12/reddit-r-watch-people-die

18.

Dowsett

Jackson

(2019) The effect of violence and competition within video games on aggression. Computers in Human Behavior 99: 22–27.

19.

Drummond

Sauer

Ferguson

, et al. (2021) Violent and non-violent virtual reality video games: influences on affect, aggressive cognition, and aggressive behavior – two pre-registered experiments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 95: 104119.

20.

Feinstein

Audet

Waknine

(2014) Witnessing images of extreme violence: a psychological study of journalists in the newsroom. JRSM Open 5(6): 533323.

21.

Ferguson

Wang

(2021) Aggressive video games are not a risk factor for mental health problems in youth: a longitudinal study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24(1): 70–73.

22.

Ferrara

Varol

Davis

, et al. (2016) The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM 59(7): 96–104.

23.

Grizzard

Huang

Weiss

, et al. (2017) Graphic violence as moral motivator: the effects of graphically violent content in news. Mass Communication and Society 20(6): 763–783.

24.

Holman

Garfin

Lubens

, et al. (2020) Media exposure to collective trauma, mental health, and functioning: does it matter what you see? Clinical Psychological Science 8(1): 111–124.

25.

Hopwood

Schutte

(2017) Psychological outcomes in reaction to media exposure to disasters and large-scale violence: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence 7(2): 316–327.

26.

International Telecommunications Union (2021) Facts and figures. Available at: https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2021/

27.

Jowett

(2015) A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12(3): 287–297.

28.

Krause

Smyth

Jansen

(2020) Exploring the effects of violent video games on healthcare trainees. Simulation and Gaming 51(5): 653–665.

29.

Krumm

Davies

Narayanaswami

(2008) User-generated content. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(4): 10–11.

30.

Lazarus

Folkman

(1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.

31.

Locker

(2015) Run the gauntlet is the most disgusting challenge on the internet. Vice, 29 October. Available at: https://www.vice.com/en/article/3da873/run-the-gauntlet-is-the-most-disgusting-challenge-on-the-internet

32.

Ludemann

(2018) /pol/emics: ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan. Discourse, Context and Media 24: 92–98.

33.

Malterud

Siersma

Guassora

(2016) Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research 26(13): 1753–1760.

34.

Martinez

Powell

(2021) Reddit 50/50: the daring challenge suddenly taking over the Internet. Daily Dot, 3 February. Available at: https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/reddit-50-50/?msclkid=789254bfd06c11ec88222d5f0fa21741

35.

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) (2022) Children’s experiences of legal but harmful content online. Available at: https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/media/2727/legal-but-harmful-content-online-helplines-insight-briefing.pdf

36.

Nicklin

Swain

Lloyd

(2020) Reactions to unsolicited violent, and sexual, explicit media content shared over social media: gender differences and links with prior exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2): 124296.

37.

Ohlheiser

(2015) Why ‘social justice warrior’, a Gamergate insult, is now a dictionary entry. The Washington Post, 7 October. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/10/07/why-social-justice-warrior-a-gamergate-insult-is-now-a-dictionary-entry/

38.

Redmond

Jones

Holman

, et al. (2019) Who watches an ISIS beheading: and why. American Psychologist 74(5): 555–568.

39.

Salañda

(2021) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. London: SAGE.

40.

Smedley

Coulson

(2018) A practical guide to analysing online support forums. Qualitative Research in Psychology 18(1): 76–103.

41.

Smith

(2018) Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10(1): 137–149.

42.

Suler

(2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 7(3): 321–326.

43.

Tait

(2008) Pornographies of violence? Internet spectatorship on body horror. Critical Studies in Media Communication 25(1): 91–111.

44.

Terry

Hayfield

(2021) Essentials of Thematic Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

45.

Thompson

Jones

Holman

, et al. (2019) Media exposure to mass violence events can fuel a cycle of distress. Science Advances 5(4): aav3502.

46.

Tracy

(2010) Qualitative quality: eight ‘Big-Tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10): 837–851.

47.

Twenge

Martin

Spitzberg

(2019) Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: the rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 8(4): 329–345.

48.

Udwan

Leurs

Alencar

(2020) Digital resilience tactics of Syrian refugees in the Netherlands: social media for social support, health, and identity. Social Media + Society 6(2): 915587.

49.

Willig

(2012) ‘Perspectives on the epistemological bases for qualitative research. In: Cooper

Camic

Long

, et al. (eds) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, vol.2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 5–21.

50.

Wood

(2017) Antisocial media and algorithmic deviancy amplification: analysing the id of Facebook’s technological unconscious. Theoretical Criminology 21(2): 168–185.

51.

Wood

(2018) ‘I just wanna see someone get knocked the fuck out’: spectating affray on Facebook fight pages. Crime, Media, Culture 14(1): 23–40.

Investigating the experience of viewing extreme real-world violence online: Naturalistic evidence from an online discussion forum

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References