With large social media platforms coming under increasing pressure to deplatform far-right users, the Alternative Technology movement (Alt-Tech) emerged as a new digital support infrastructure for the far right. We conduct a qualitative analysis of the prominent Alt-Tech platform Gab, a social networking service primarily modelled on Twitter, to assess the far-right virtual community on the platform. We find Gab’s technological affordances – including its lack of content moderation, culture of anonymity, microblogging architecture and funding model – have fostered an ideologically eclectic far-right community united by fears of persecution at the hands of ‘Big Tech’. We argue that this points to the emergence of a novel techno-social victimology as an axis of far-right virtual community, wherein shared experiences or fears of being deplatformed facilitate a coalescing of assorted far-right tendencies online.
BerbrierM (2000) The victim ideology of white supremacists and white separatists in the United States. Sociological Focus33(2): 175–191.
2.
BergerJMStrathearnB (2013) Who matters online: measuring influence, evaluating content and countering violent extremism in online social networks. Report, The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence, London, 28March.
3.
BimberBGil de ZúñigaH (2020) The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society22(4): 700–715.
BucherTHelmondA (2017) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJMarwickAPoellT (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: SAGE, pp. 233–253.
8.
BurrisVSmithEStrahmA (2000) White supremacist networks on the Internet. Sociological Focus33(2): 215–235.
9.
BuyukozturkBGauldenSDowd-ArrowB (2018) Contestation on Reddit, Gamergate, and movement barriers. Social Movement Studies17(5): 592–609.
10.
CarenNJowersKGabyS (2012) A social movement online community: Stormfront and the white nationalist movement. In: EarlJSRohlingerDA (eds) Media, Movements, and Political Change. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 163–193.
11.
ConwayM (2017) Determining the role of the Internet in violent extremism and terrorism: six suggestions for progressing research. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism40(1): 77–98.
12.
CrossetVTannerSCampanaA (2019) Researching far right groups on Twitter: methodological challenges 2.0. New Media & Society21(4): 939–961.
13.
De KosterWHoutmanD (2008) ‘STORMFRONT IS LIKE A SECOND HOME TO ME’: on virtual community formation by right-wing extremists. Information, Communication & Society11(8): 1155–1176.
DonovanJLewisBFriedbergB (2019) Parallel ports: sociotechnical change from the Alt-Right to Alt-Tech. In: FielitzMThurstonN (eds) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Wetzlar: transcript Verlag, pp. 49–66.
16.
EbnerJ (2020) Going Dark: The Secret Social Lives of Extremists. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
ElSheriefMKulkarniVNguyenD, et al. (2018) Hate lingo: a target-based linguistic analysis of hate speech in social media. In: Proceedings of the 12th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Palo Alto, CA, 25–28 June, no. 1. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
19.
FutrellRSimiP (2004) Free spaces, collective identity, and the persistence of U.S. white power activism. Social Problems51(1): 16–42.
GAB AI, Inc. (2020a) Gab Pro. Available at: https://pro.gab.com/ (accessed 21 October 2020).
22.
GAB AI, Inc. (2020b) Website terms of service. Available at: https://gab.com/about/tos (10April, accessed 21 October 2020).
23.
GaneshB (2018) The ungovernability of digital hate culture. Journal of International Affairs71(2): 30–49.
24.
GaudetteTScrivensRDaviesG, et al. (2020) Upvoting extremism: collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 12 September. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820958123.
25.
GrahamTWrightS (2014) Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of ‘superparticipants’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19(3): 625–642.
26.
HermanssonPLawrenceDMulhallJ, et al. (2020) The International Alt-Right: Fascism for the 21st Century?New York: Routledge.
27.
HsiehHFShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288.
JasserG (2021) Gab as an imitated counterpublic. In: DevriesMBessantJWattsR (eds) Rise of the Far Right: Technologies of Recruitment and Mobilization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 193–222.
30.
JonesCTrottVWrightS (2019) Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment. New Media & Society22(10): 1903–1921.
LeonardiPM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly35(1): 147–167.
LimaLReisJCSMeloP, et al. (2018) Inside the right-leaning echo chambers: characterizing gab, an unmoderated social system. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), Barcelona, 28–31 August, pp. 515–522. New York: IEEE.
35.
McIlroy-YoungRAndersonA (2019) From ‘welcome new gabbers’ to the Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting: the evolution of gab. In: Proceedings of the 13th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Münich, 11–14 June, pp. 651–654. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
36.
McSwineyJ (2021) Recruitment and mobilization on Facebook: the case of Australia. In: DevriesMBessantJWattsR (eds) Rise of the Far Right: Technologies of Recruitment and Mobilization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 23–40.
37.
MarcksHPawelzJ (2020) From myths of victimhood to fantasies of violence: how far-right narratives of imperilment work. Terrorism and Political Violence. Epub ahead of print 24 July. DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2020.1788544.
38.
MathewBIllendulaASahaP, et al. (2019) Temporal effects of unmoderated hate speech in gab. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10966.
39.
MerceaD (2013) Probing the implications of Facebook use for the organizational form of social movement organizations. Information, Communication & Society16(8): 1306–1327.
40.
Miller-IdrissC (2018) The Extreme Gone Mainstream: Commercialization and Far Right Youth Culture in Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
NissenbaumAShifmanL (2017) Internet memes as contested cultural capital: the case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society19(4): 483–501.
43.
OatenA (2014) The cult of the victim: an analysis of the collective identity of the English Defence League. Patterns of Prejudice48(4): 331–349.
44.
O’CallaghanDGreeneDConwayM, et al. (2015) Down the (white) rabbit hole: the extreme right and online recommender systems. Social Science Computer Review33(4): 459–478.
45.
PerryBScrivensR (2016) White pride worldwide: constructing global identities online. In: SchweppeJWaltersM (eds) The Globalization of Hate: Internationalizing Hate Crime?New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–78.
46.
RidingsCMGefenD (2004) Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00229.x.
47.
ScottJ (2013) Social Network Analysis. 3rd ed.London: SAGE.
48.
SimiPFutrellR (2006) Cyberculture and the endurance of white power activism. Journal of Political and Military Sociology34(1): 115–142.
49.
SimiPWindischS (2020) The culture of violent talk: an interpretive approach. Social Sciences9: 120.
50.
StierSPoschLBleierA, et al. (2017) When populists become popular: comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society20(9): 1365–1388.
51.
TreemJWLeonardiPM (2013) Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association36(1): 143–189.
52.
WahlströmMTörnbergAEkbrandH (2020) Dynamics of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric in far-right social media. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 30 August. DOI: 10.1177/1461444820952795.
53.
ZannettouSBradlynBDe CristofaroE, et al. (2018) What is gab? A bastion of free speech or an Alt-Right echo chamber? In: Companion proceedings of the web conference, Lyon, 23–27 April, pp. 1007–1014. New York: ACM.
54.
ZannettouSFinkelsteinJBradlynB, et al. (2020) A quantitative approach to understanding online antisemitism. In: Proceedings of the 14th international AAAI conference on web and social media, Atlanta, GA, 8–11 June, pp. 786–797. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
55.
ZhouYDredzeMBroniatowskiDA, et al. (2019) Elites and foreign actors among the alt-right: the Gab social media platform. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 2 September. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v24i9.10062.
