Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection,resistance,acceptance,and self-blame

Abstract

Although scholars increasingly use online platforms for public, digital, and networked scholarship, the research examining their experiences of harassment and abuse online is scant. In this study, we interviewed 14 women scholars who experienced online harassment in order to understand how they coped with this phenomenon. We found that scholars engaged in reactive, anticipatory, preventive, and proactive coping strategies. In particular, scholars engaged in strategies aimed at self-protection and resistance, while often responding to harassment by acceptance and self-blame. These findings have important implications for practice and research, including practical recommendations for personal, institutional, and platform responses to harassment, as well as scholarly recommendations for future research into scholars’ experiences of harassment.

Keywords

Abuse and harassment faculty harassment female harassment networked scholarship online harassment online participation public scholarship scholars’ online experiences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (2017) An in-depth look at targeted harassment of faculty. One Faculty One Resistance. Available at: https://onefacultyoneresistance.org/faculty-attack-fighting-targeted-harassment/ (accessed 22 January 2018).

Angus Reid (2016) Trolls and Tribulations: One-in-Four Canadians Say They’re Being Harassed on Social Media. Available at: http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2016.10.04-Social-Media.pdf (accessed 10 February 2018).

Baker

(2017) Furious but frightened. Women in Higher Education. Available at: https://www.wihe.com/article-details/47/furious-but-frightened/ (accessed 23 February 2018).

Baker

Edwards

(2012) How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf(accessed 12 February 2018).

Barak

(2005) Sexual harassment on the internet. Social Science Computer Review 23: 77–92.

Biggs

Brough

Drummond

(2017) Lazarus & Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In: Cooper

Quick

(eds) The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 349–364.

Borrajo

Gámez-Guadix

Calvete

(2015) Cyber dating abuse: prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports 116: 565–585.

Boseley

(2017) Mary Beard abused on Twitter over Roman Britain’s ethnic diversity. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/06/mary-beard-twitter-abuse-roman-britain-ethnic-diversity (accessed 23 April 2018).

Brady

Holcomb

Smith

(2010) The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: a case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 9(2): 151–170.

10.

Campbell

(2017) “Apparently Being a Self-Obsessed C**t Is Now Academically Lauded”: Experiencing Twitter Trolling of Autoethnographers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research] Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 18(3). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2819/4151 (accessed 29 May 2018).

11.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2014) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Available at: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf (accessed 19 April 2018).

12.

Cassidy

Faucher

Jackson

(2014) The dark side of the ivory tower: cyberbullying of university faculty and teaching personnel. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 60(2): 279–299.

13.

Chess

Shaw

(2015) A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about #gamergate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59(1): 208–220.

14.

Citron

(2014) Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Clark-Parsons

(2018) Building a digital girl army: the cultivation of feminist safe spaces online. New Media & Society 20(6): 2125–2144. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817731919.

16.

Cottom

(2015) “Who do you think you are?” When marginality meets academic microcelebrity Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology #7. Available at: https://adanewmedia.org/2015/04/issue7-mcmillancottom/

17.

Donoghue

(2015) #WatchWhatYouSay. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 September. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/WatchWhatYouSay/233405 (accessed 12 February 2018).

18.

Dowell

(2013) Mary Beard suffers “truly vile” online abuse after question time. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/jan/21/mary-beard-suffers-twitter-abuse (accessed 23 April 2018).

19.

Duggan

(2014) Online harassment. The Pew Research Centre: Internet, Science and Tech. Available at: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2014/10/PI_OnlineHarassment_72815.pdf (accessed 12 February 2018).

20.

Eckert

(2018) Fighting for recognition: online abuse of women bloggers in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. New Media & Society 20(4): 1282–1302.

21.

Faucher

Jackson

Cassidy

(2014) Cyberbullying among university students: gendered experiences, impacts, and perspectives. Education Research International 2014: 698545.

22.

Fox

Cruz

C and

Lee

(2015) Perpetuating online sexism offline: anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in Human Behavior 52: 436–442.

23.

Friesen

Lowe

(2012) The questionable promise of social media for education: connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(3): 183–194.

24.

Girdano

Dusek

Everly

(1990) Controlling Stress and Tension. London: Pearson.

25.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

26.

Gruzd

Staves

Wilk

(2012) Connected scholars: examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior 28(6): 2340–2350.

27.

Henry

Powell

(2015a) Beyond the “sext”: technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 48(1): 104–118.

28.

Henry

Powell

(2015b) Embodied harms: gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence against Women 21(6): 758–779.

29.

Henry

Powell

(2016) Technology-facilitated sexual violence: a literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 19: 195–208.

30.

Hess

(2014) Why women aren’t welcome on the Internet. Pacific Standard, 6 January. Available at: https://psmag.com/why-women-aren-t-welcome-on-the-internet-aa21fdbc8d6 (accessed 16 January 2018).

31.

Hochschild

(1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

32.

Hurley

(2016). The Geek Feminist Revolution: Essays.New York, NY: Tom Doherty Associates, LLC.

33.

Jane

(2017) Misogyny Online: A Short and Brutish History. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

34.

Jordan

Weller

(2018) Academics and social networking sites: benefits, problems and tensions in professional engagement with online networking. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2018(1): 1.

35.

Knapp

Faley

Ekeberg

et al . (1997) Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: a conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 22(3): 687–729.

36.

Lazarus

Folkman

(1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

37.

Lenhart

Ybarra

Zickuhr

et al . (2016) Online Harassment, Digital Abuse, and Cyberstalking in America. Report of Data & Society Research Institute, Report no. 11.21.16. New York: Center for Innovative Public Health Research. Available at: https://datasociety.net/output/online-harassment-digital-abuse-cyberstalking/ (accessed 28 February 2018).

38.

Manca

Ranieri

(2015) “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!” Social media in academic practices. Internet and Higher Education 29: 6–74.

39.

Mantilla

(2013) Gendertrolling: misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies 39(2): 563–570.

40.

Mantilla

(2015) Gendertrolling: How misogyny went viral. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.

41.

Mbatha

(2014) Global transition in higher education: from the traditional model of learning to a new socially mediated model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 15(3): 257–274.

42.

Megarry

(2014) Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age. Women’s Studies International Forum 47: 46–55.

43.

Merriam

(1995) What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 4: 51–60.

44.

Pew Research Centre (2018) Crossing the Line: What Counts as Online Harassment?. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/01/04/crossing-the-line-what-counts-as-online-(accessed 28 February 2018).

45.

Poland

(2016) Haters: harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online. Lincoln, NE: Potomac Books.

46.

Pryal

(2014) Disclosure blues: should you tell colleagues about your mental illness? Chronicle Vitae, 13 June. Available at: https://chroniclevitae.com/news/546-disclosure-bluesshould-you-tell-colleagues-about-your-mental-illness (accessed 18 February 2018).

47.

Salter

Blodgett

(2012) Hypermasculinity & dickwolves: the contentious role of women in the new gaming public. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(3): 401–416.

48.

Scarduzio

Sheff

Smith

(2017) Coping and sexual harassment: how victims cope across multiple settings. Archives of Sexual Behavior 47(2): 327–340.

49.

Schenck

Fremouw

(2012) Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of School Violence 11(1): 21–37.

50.

Schwarzer

(2000) Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In: Locke

(ed.) The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 342–355.

51.

Shrivastava

(2015) Harassment at the workplace, powerlessness and identity: experiences of women civil servants in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 22(3): 437–457.

52.

Staude-Müller

Hansen

Voss

(2012) How stressful is online victimization? Effects of victim’s personality and properties of the incident. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 9(2): 260–274.

53.

Thelwall

(2002) Research dissemination and invocation on the web. Online Information Review 26(6): 413–420.

54.

Tokunaga

(2010) Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior 26(3): 277–287.

55.

Veletsianos

(2016) Networked Scholars: Social Media in Academia. New York: Routledge.

56.

Veletsianos

Kimmons

(2013) Scholars and faculty members lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education 16(1): 43–50.

57.

Veletsianos

Kimmons

(2016) Scholars in an increasingly digital and open world: how do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education 30: 1–10.

58.

Vera-Gray

(2017) “Talk about a cunt with too much idle time”: trolling feminist research. Feminist Review 115: 61–78.

59.

Vitak

Chadha

Steiner

et al . (2017) Identifying women’s experiences with and strategies for mitigating negative effects of online harassment. In: CSCW’17 proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. Portland, OR, 25 February–1 March, pp. 1231–1245. New York: ACM.

60.

Wasti

Cortina

(2002) Coping in context: sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2): 394.

61.

Wharton

(2009) The sociology of emotional labor. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 147–165.

62.

Willard

(2006) Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Cruelty, Threats, and Distress. Eugene, OR: Research Press.

63.

Ybarra

Mitchell

Wolak

et al . (2006) Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: findings from the second youth Internet safety study. Pediatrics 118: e1169–e1177.