PaimelaHOksalaNKivilaaksoE: Surgery for peptic ulcer today. A study on the incidence, methods and mortality in surgery for peptic ulcer in Finland between 1987 and 1999. Dig Surg2004;21:185–191.
2.
RabinoviciRMannyJ: Perforated duodenal ulcer in the elderly. Eur J Surg1991;157:121–125.
3.
ChamberlainDTaylorHBentleyJ: Discussion on the operative and conservative management of perforated peptic ulceration. Proc R Soc Med1951;44:273–282.
4.
TaylorH: The non-surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Gastroenterology1957;33:353–368.
5.
BehrmanS: Management of complicated peptic ulcer disease. Arch Surg2005;140:201–208.
6.
HighamJKangJMajeedA: Recent trends in admissions and mortality due to peptic ulcer in England: Increasing frequency ot haemorrhage among older subjects. Gut2002;50:460–464.
7.
GisbertJLegidoJGarcia-SanzI: Helicobacter pylori and perforated peptic ulcer: Prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:116–120.
8.
WattsDDFakhrySM: Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt trauma: An analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the East multi-institutional trial. J Trauma2003;54(2):289–294.
9.
OostingSFPetersFTHospersGAMulderNH: A patient with metastatic melanoma presenting with gastrointestinal perforation after dacarbazine infusion: A case report. J Med Case Reports2010;4(1):10.
10.
GolffierCHolguinFKobayashiA: Duodenal perforation because of swallowed ballpoint pen and its laparoscopic management: Report of a case. J Pediatr Surg2009;44(3):634–636.
11.
GohB.K.ChowP.K.QuahHM: Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract secondary to ingestion of foreign bodiesWorld J Surg2006;30(3):372–377.
12.
JalihalAChongVH: Duodenal perforations and haematoma: Complications of endoscopic therapy. ANZ J Surg2009;79(10):767–768.
13.
BianchiniAUMehtaSNMulderDSBarkunANMayrandS: Duodenal perforation by a Greenfield filter: Endoscopic diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol1997;92(4):686–687.
14.
FeezorRJHuberTSWelbornMB3rdSchellSR: Duodenal perforation with an inferior vena cava filter: An unusual cause of abdominal pain. J Vasc Surg2002;35(5):1010–1012.
15.
MaoZZhuQWuWWangMLiJ: Duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Experience and management. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2008;18(5):691–695.
16.
PalaniveluCJategaonkarPARangarajanMAnandNVSenthilnathanP: Laparoscopic management of a retroperitoneal duodenal perforation following ERCP for periampullary cancer. JSLS2008;12(4):399–402.
17.
ZebFKevansDMuirKCourtneyG: Duodenal impaction/perforation of a biliary stent — A rare complication in the management of choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis2009;18(3):391–392.
18.
LeeFYLeungKLLaiBS: Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg2001;136:90–94.
19.
AriciCMesciADincerD: Analysis of risk factors predicting (affecting) mortality and morbidity of peptic ulcer perforations. Int Surg2001;92:147–154.
20.
KocerBSurmeliSSolakC: Factors affecting mortality and morbidity in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol2001;22:565–570.
21.
BucherPOulhaciWMorelPRisFHuberO: Results of conservative treatment for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:337–340.
22.
BoeyJChoiSKPoonA: Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg2001;205:22–26.
23.
SiuWLeongHLawB: Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg2002;235:313–319.
24.
UcchedduAFlorisGAltanaM: Surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in the elderly. Evaluation of factors influencing prognosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:1956–1958.
25.
TsugawaKKoyanagiNHashizumeM: The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age. Hepatogastroenterology2001;48:156–162.
26.
LinderMMWachaHFeldmannU: The Mannheim Peritonitis Index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirurg2001;58:84–92.
27.
SoJBYamACheahWK: Risk factors related to operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency gastrectomy. Br J Surg2000;87:1702–1707.
28.
LuneviciusRMorkeviciusM: Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg2005;92:1195–1207.
29.
LeeSCFungCPChenHY: Candida peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation: Incidence rate, risk factors, pronosis and susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B. Diagn Micro Infect Dis2002;44:23–27.
30.
BoeyJWongJOngGB: Bacteria and septic complications in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers. Am J Surg1982;143:635–639.
31.
FakhrySWattsDDaleyB: Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforating blunt small bowel injury (SBI): Findings from a large multi-institutional study. J Trauma2001;51:1232.
32.
MalhotraAKFabianTCKatsisSB: Blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries: The role of screening computed tomography. J Trauma2000;48:991–1000.
33.
FakhrySWattsDClancyK: Diagnosing blunt small bowel injury (SBI): An analysis of the clinical utility of computerized tomography (CT) scan from a large multi-institutional trial. J Trauma2001;51:1232.
34.
JacobsDGAngusLRodriguezA: Peritoneal lavage white count: A reassessment. J Trauma1990;30:607.
35.
RozyckiGSBallardRBFelicianoDV: Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries. Ann Surg1998;228:557.
36.
CroftsTJKennethGMParkMBStelleRJCChungSSCLiAKC: A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med1989;320:970–973.
37.
MarshallCRamaswamyPBerginFGRosenbergILLeaperDJ: Evaluation of a protocol for the nonoperative management of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg1999;86:131–134.
38.
SvanesCLieRTSvanesKLieSASoreideO: Adverse effects of delayed treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg1994;220:168–175.
HermanssonMvon HolsteinCSZillingT: Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation. Eur J Surg1999;165:566–5721.
41.
BugnonPRivoalanFGautier-BenoitC: Present status of the Taylor method in perforated ulcer of the duodenal bulb. J Chir (Paris)1986;123:463–466.
42.
KeaneTDillonBAfdhalN: Conservative management of perforated duodenal ulcer. Br J Surg1988;75:583–584.
43.
BerneTDonovanA: Nonoperative treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Arch Surg1989;124:830–832.
44.
BucherPOulhaciWMorelPRisFHuberO: Results of conservative treatment for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Swiss Med Wkly2007;137:337–340.
45.
HermanssonMvon HolsteinCSZillingT: Peptic ulcer perforation before and after the introduction of H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors. Scand J Gastroenterol1997;32:523–529.
46.
BulutORasmussenCFischerA: Acute surgical treatment of complicated peptic ulcer with special reference to the elderly. World J Surg1996;20:574–577.
47.
SvanesCSalvesenHStangelandLSvanesKSoreideO: Perforated peptic ulcer over 56 years. Time trends in patients and disease characteristics. Gut1993;34:1666–1671.
48.
NaesgaardJMEdwinBReiertsenO: Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg1999;165:209–214.
49.
HentschelEBrandstatterGDragosicsB: Effect of ranitidine and amoxicillin plus metronidazole on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the recurrence of duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med1993;328:308–312.
50.
Van der HulstRWMRauwsEAJHoycuB: Prevention of ulcer recurrence after eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A prospective long-term follow-up study. Gastroenterol1997;113 (Suppl 1) 082–S1086.
51.
BlomgrenLGM: Perforated peptic ulcer: Long-term results of simple closure in the elderly. World J Surg1997;21:412–415.
BornmanPCTheodoruNAJeffreyPC: Simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer: A prospective evaluation of a conservative management policy. Br J Surg1990;77:73–75.
54.
PescatorePHalkicNCalmesJMBlumAGilletM: Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc1998;48:411–414.
55.
BoeyJBranickiFJAlagaratnamTT: Proximal gastric vagotomy: The preferred operation for perforation in acute duodenal ulcer. Ann Surg1988;208:169–174.
56.
BoeyJWongJPerforated duodenal ulcers. World J Surg1987;11:319–324.
57.
JordanPHMorrowC: Perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Clin North Am1988;68:315–329.
58.
LauWYLeungKLKwongKH: A non-randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg1996;224:131–138.
59.
JohanssonBHallerbackBGliseHJohnssonE: Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated peptic ulcer. A non-randomized comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc1996;10:656–658.
60.
MiserezMEypaschESpangenbergerWLeferingRTroidlH: Laparoscopic and conventional closure of perforated peptic ulcer: A comparison. Surg Endosc1996;10:831–836.
61.
SoJBYKumCKFernandesMLGohP: Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc1996;10:1060–1063.
62.
DruartMLVan HeeREtienneJ: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc1997;11:1017–1020.
63.
LauJYWLoSNgEKW: A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair. Am J Surg1998;175:325–327.
64.
BergamaschiRMarvikRJohnsenG: Open vs. laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc1999;13:679–682.
65.
KatkhoudaNMavorEMasonRJ: Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers. Outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg1999;134:845–850.
66.
KokKYYMathewVVYappSKS: Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Am Surg1999;65:27–30.
67.
IrvinTT: Mortality and perforated peptic ulcer: A case for risk stratification in elderly patients. Br J Surg1989;76:215–218.