Trading representation: Diplomacy’s influence on preferential trade agreements

Abstract

A multidisciplinary literature explores the implications of economic diplomacy, but has largely ignored international cooperation on economic agreements. We provide a first exploration of the implications of bilateral diplomatic missions for the formation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs). We argue that high-level diplomatic relations increase the likelihood of PTA ratification between two countries because diplomats have a number of political and economic incentives to see these agreements implemented. Evidence from a global panel of country dyads spanning 1960–2005 indicates that the presence of ambassadors is linked to an increased probability that a PTA will be concluded within a dyad, opening new avenues for further research.

Keywords

diplomacy international trade preferential trade agreements regionalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afman

Maurel

(2010) Diplomatic relations and trade reorientation in transition countries. In: Van Bergeijk

PAG

Brakman

(eds) The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 278–295.

Anderson

Van Wincoop

(2004) Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 691–751.

Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2015) Four pillars of Australia’s economic diplomacy. Available at: http://dfat.gov.au/trade/economic-diplomacy/Pages/four-pillars-of-australias-economic-diplomacy.aspx (accessed 7 November 2015).

Baccini

(2012) Democratization and trade policy: An empirical analysis of developing countries. European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 455–479.

Baccini

Kim

(2012) Preventing protectionism: International institutions and trade policy. Review of International Organizations 7(4): 369–398.

Baccini

Dür

Elsig

(2015) The politics of trade agreement design: Revisiting the depth-flexibility nexus. International Studies Quarterly 59: 765–775.

Bagwell

Staiger

(2001) Reciprocity, non-discrimination and preferential agreements in the multilateral trading system’. European Journal of Political Economy 17(2): 281–325.

Baier

Bergstrand

(2004) Economic determinants of free trade agreements. Journal of International Economics 64(1): 29–63.

Baier

Bergstrand

(2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members international trade? Journal of International Economics 71(1): 72–95.

10.

Baier

Bergstrand

(2009) Estimating the effects of free trade agreements on international trade flows using matching econometrics. Journal of International Economics 77(1): 63–76.

11.

Baier

Bergstrand

Mariutto

(2014) Economic determinants of free trade agreements revisited: Distinguishing sources of interdependence. Review of International Economics 22(1): 31–58.

12.

Baldwin

(1996) A domino theory of regionalism. In: Baldwin

Haapranta

Kiander

(eds) Expanding European Regionalism: The EU’s New Members. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–53.

13.

Baldwin

Jaimovich

(2012) Are free trade agreements contagious? Journal of International Economics 88(1): 1–16.

14.

Barbieri

Keskh

(2012) Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 3.0. Available at: http://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/bilateral-trade (accessed 12 April 2014).

15.

Bayer

(2006) Diplomatic exchange data set, v2006.1. Available at: http://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/diplomatic-exchange (accessed 12 April 2014).

16.

Bayner

Woolcock

(2007) The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

17.

Büthe

Milner

(2014) Institutional diversity in trade agreements and foreign direct investment: Credibility, commitment, and economic flows in the developing world, 1971–2007. World Politics 66(1): 88–122.

18.

Chase

(2005) Trading Blocs: States, Firms, and Regions in the World Economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

19.

Coolsaet

(2004) Trade and diplomacy: The Belgian case. International Studies Perspectives 5(1): 61–65.

20.

Creusen

Lejour

(2012) Market entry and economic diplomacy. Applied Economics Letters 20(5): 504–507.

21.

Dür

(2007) EU trade policy as protection for exporters: The agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 833–855.

22.

Egger

Greenaway

(2008) Trade liberalization with multinational firms: Effects on welfare and intra-industry trade. Journal of International Economics 74(2): 278–298.

23.

Egger

Larch

(2008) Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics 76(2): 384–399.

24.

Elsig

(2007) The EU’s choice of regulatory venues for trade negotiations: A tale of agency power? Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 927–948.

25.

Elsig

Dupont

(2011) European Union meets South Korea: Bureaucratic interests, exporter discrimination and the negotiations of trade agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 492–507.

26.

Frankel

(1997) Regional Trading-Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

27.

Frankel

Stein

Wei

(1995) Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural and the supernatural. Journal of Development Economics 47(1): 61–96.

28.

Frankel

Stein

Wei

(1996) Regional trade arrangements: Natural or supernatural? American Economic Review 86(2): 52–56.

29.

Frankel

Stein

Wei

(1998) Continental trading blocs: Are they natural or supernatural. In: Frankel

(ed.) The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–113.

30.

Gartzke

(2007) The Capitalist Peace. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 166–191.

31.

Gibler

(2009) International military alliances, 1648-2009. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Available at: http://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/formal-alliances (accessed 25 April 2014).

32.

Gowa

(1994) Allies, Adversaries, International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

Gowa

Mansfield

(1993) Power politics and international trade. American Political Science Review 87(2): 408–420.

34.

Gray

(2014) Domestic capacity and the implementation gap in regional trade agreements’. Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 55–84.

35.

Haftel

(2013) Commerce and institutions: Trade, scope, and the design of regional economic organizations. The Review of International Organizations 8: 389–414.

36.

Head

Ries

(2010) Do trade missions increase trade? Canadian Journal of Economics 43(3): 754–775.

37.

Jensen

(2003) Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization 57(3): 587–616.

38.

Johns

(2014) Depth versus rigidity in the design of international trade agreements. Journal of Theoretical Politics 26(3): 468–495.

39.

Keeley

(ed.) (2000) First Line of Defense: Ambassadors, Embassies, and American Interests Abroad. Washington, DC: American Academy of Diplomacy.

40.

Kinne

(2014) Dependent diplomacy: Signaling, strategy, and prestige in the diplomatic network. International Studies Quarterly 58(2): 247–259.

41.

Kostecki

Naray

(2007) Commercial diplomacy and international business, Nederlands Instituut voor Internationale Betrekkingen ‘Clingendael’, 1–41.

42.

Krishna

(1998) Regionalism and multilateralism: A political economy approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1): 227–251.

43.

Kucik

Reinhardt

(2008) Does flexibility promote cooperation? An application to the global trade regime. International Organization 62(3): 477–505.

44.

Lawrence

(1998) Comment on: The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In: Frankel

(ed.) The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 33–63.

45.

Lee

(2004) The growing influence of business in U.K. diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives 5(1): 50–54.

46.

Lee

Hudson

(2004) The old and the new significance of political economy in diplomacy. Review of International Studies 30(3): 343–360.

47.

Lupu

(2014) Why do states join some universal treaties but not others? An analysis of treaty commitment preferences. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Epub ahead of print 8 December. DOI: 10.1177/0022002714560344.

48.

Magee

(2003) ‘Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis.’ Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy 2.1.

49.

Maliniak

Plouffe

(2011) A network approach to the formation of diplomatic ties. Presented 3rd September at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA, 1–4 September.

50.

Manger

(2009) Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

51.

Manger

(2012) Vertical trade specialization and the formation of north-south PTAs. World Politics 64(4): 622–658.

52.

Manger

Pickup

Snijders

TAB

(2012) A hierarchy of preferences: A longitudinal network analyses approach to PTA formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(5): 854–878.

53.

Mansfield

(1998) The proliferation of preferential trading arrangements. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(5): 523–543.

54.

Mansfield

Pevehouse

(2006) Democratization and international organizations. International Organization 60(1): 137–167.

55.

Mansfield

Milner

Pevehouse

(2008) Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration. The World Economy 31(1): 67–97.

56.

Mansfield

Milner

Rosendorff

(2000) Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreement. International Organization 56(3): 477–513.

57.

Marshall

(2013) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2013. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/ (accessed 12 April 2014).

58.

Mattli

(1999) The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Mayer

Zignago

(2006) Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: The GeoDist database. CEPII Working Paper, No. 25. Available at: http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=6 (accessed 15 July 2016).

60.

Michaely

(1998) Partners to a preferential trade agreement: Implications of varying size. Journal of International Economics 46(1): 73–85.

61.

Moons

SJV

Van Bergeijk

PAG

(2013) A meta-analysis of economic diplomacy and its effect on international economic flows. ISS Working Paper, 566, October 2013. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies.

62.

Morrow

Siverson

Tabares

(1998) The political determinants of international trade: The major powers, 1907–90. The American Political Science Review 92(3): 649–661.

63.

Naray

(2010) Commercial diplomats in the context of international business. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6(1): 121–148.

64.

Neumayer

(2007) Distance, power and ideology: Diplomatic representation in a world of nation-states. Area 40(2): 228–236.

65.

Nitsch

(2005) State visits and international trade. CESifo Working paper, No. 1582, November 2005. Available at: https://www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome.html (accessed 15 July 2016).

66.

Nye

(1988) Neorealism and neoliberalism. World Politics 40(2): 235–251.

67.

Okano-Heijmans

(2008) Japan and the multilateral talks: Peripheral player, powerful spoiler. In: de Ceuster

Melissen

(eds) Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crises: Six Parties, Six Perspectives. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, pp. 71–83.

68.

Okano-Heijmans

(2011) Conceptualizing economic diplomacy: The crossroads of international relations, economics, IPE, and diplomatic Studies. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6(1–2): 7–36.

69.

Pelc

(2009) Seeking escape: The use of escape clauses in international trade agreements’. International Studies Quarterly 53(2): 349–368.

70.

Pevehouse

(2005) Democracy from Above? Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

71.

Pevehouse

Russett

(2006) Democratic intergovernmental organizations cause peace. International Organization 60(4): 277–309.

72.

Plouffe

(2012) Liberalization for sale: Heterogeneous firms and lobbying over FTAs. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA.

73.

Poulsen

(2015) Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

74.

Poulsen

Aisbett

(2016) Diplomats want treaties: Diplomatic agendas and perks in the investment regime. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 7: 6.

75.

Rana

(2007) Economic diplomacy: The experience of developing countries’. In: Bayner

Woolwock

(eds) The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 201–220.

76.

Rose

(2007) The foreign service and foreign trade: Embassies as export promotion. The World Economy 30(1): 22–38.

77.

Rosendorff

Milner

(2001) The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization 54: 4, 829–857.

78.

Simmons

(1994) Executing U.S. foreign policy through the country team concept. AFL Review 37.

79.

Singer

Small

(1973) The diplomatic importance of states, 1816-1970: An extension and refinement of the indicator. World Politics 25(4): 577–599.

80.

Stringer

(2007) Think global act local: Honorary consuls in a transforming diplomatic world. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, 109.

81.

Van Bergeijk

PAG

(2009) Economic Diplomacy and the Geography of International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

82.

Van Bergeijk

PAG

de Groot

HLF

Yakop

(2011) The economic effectiveness of diplomatic representation: An economic analysis of its contribution to bilateral trade. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6(1–2): 101–120.

83.

Van Bergeijk

PAG

Melissen

Okono-Heijmans

(2011) Economic Diplomacy: Economic and Political Perspectives. Leiden: Brill Publishers.

84.

Veenstra

MLEH

Van Yakop

Bergeijk

PAG

(2011) The geography of trade and the network effects of economic diplomacy in the South. In: Murshed

Goulart

Serino

(eds) South-South Globalization Challenges and Opportunities for Development. London: Routledge, pp. 172–194.

85.

Voeten

Strezhnev

(2013) United Nations general assembly voting data. Available at: http://thedata.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/Voeten/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/12379 (accessed 29 April 2014).

86.

Vogeler

(1995) Cold war geopolitics: Embassy locations. Journal of Geography 94(1): 323–329.

87.

Wonnacott

Lutz

(1989) Is there a case for free trade areas? In: Schott

(ed.) Free Trade Areas and US Trade Policy. Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics, pp. 59–84.

88.

World Bank (2014) Global preferential trade agreement database. Available from: http://wits.worldbank.org/ (accessed 11 April 2014).

89.

Xirerali

Liu

(2006) Explaining foreign diplomatic presence in the U.S. with spatial models: A liberal spatial perspective. GeoJournal 67: 85–101.

90.

Yakop

Van Bergeijk

PAG

(2009) The weight of economic and commercial diplomacy. ISS Working Paper, 478. Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

91.

Yakop

Van Bergeijk

PAG

(2011) Economic diplomacy, trade and developing countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 4: 253–267.

92.

Yarbourgh

(1992) Cooperation and Governance in International Trade: The Strategic Organizational Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB