This study examines the inclusion of disability provisions in preferential trade agreements (PTAs). We analyse how disability is referenced in 518 PTAs negotiated between 1948 and 2020. As an inductive analysis, our research identifies five main modes of inclusion of disability. In doing so, it problematizes the way disability materializes in PTAs, underscoring the prevalence of a medical model of disability and the limited scope of the provisions regarding the rights of persons with disabilities. These findings contribute to the understanding of the insertion of non-trade issues in international trade agreements and to the place of disability in global governance.
AlleeTElsigM (2019) Are the contents of international treaties copied and pasted? Evidence from preferential trade agreements. International Studies Quarterly63(3): 603–613.
2.
BacciniLDürAHaftelY (2015) Imitation and innovation in international governance: The diffusion of trade agreement design. In: DürAElsigM (eds) Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–194.
BarnesC (2013) Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In: WatsonNRoulstoneAThomasC (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 26–43.
5.
BartelsL (2009) Social issues: Labour, environment and human rights. In: MercurioBLesterS (eds) Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: Commentary and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–366.
6.
BastiaensIPostnikovE (2017) Greening up: The effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreements. Environmental Politics26(5): 847–869.
7.
ChauffourJ-PMaurJ-C (2011) Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank.
8.
DegenerT (2016) A human rights model of disability. In: BlanckPFlynnE (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Law and Human Rights. New York: Routledge, pp. 31–49.
9.
DhandaA (2008) Constructing a new human rights lexicon: Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos5(8): 42–59.
FrischD (1985) Lomé III: Living through difficult negotiations. The Courier89: 19–32. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/37200/1/A2039.pdf (accessed 21 March 2022).
13.
GrantENeuhausR (2012) Liberty and justice for all: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law19(2): 347–378.
14.
Hafner-BurtonEM (2005) Trading human rights: How preferential trade agreements influence government repression. International Organization59(3): 593–629. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877810
15.
HarpurP (2016) Old age is not just impairment: The CRPD and the need for a convention on older persons. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law37(3): 1027–1059.
16.
HendricksA (2007) UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. European Journal of Health Research14: 273–280.
17.
Hernández-TruyolBEPowellSJ (2009) Just Trade: A New Covenant Linking Trade and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press.
18.
Jaramillo RuizF (2017) The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its take on sexuality. Reproductive Health Matters25(50): 92–103.
19.
KayessRFrenchP (2008) Out of darkness into light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Human Rights Law Review8(1): 1–34.
20.
LechnerL (2016) The Domestic Battle over the design of non-trade issues in preferential trade agreements. Review of International Political Economy23(5): 840–871.
21.
LimãoN (2007) Are preferential trade agreements with non-trade objectives a stumbling block for multilateral liberalization?The Review of Economic Studies74(3): 821–855.
22.
LindqvistB (1995) Standard rules in the disability field – A new United Nations instrument. In: DegenerTKoster-DreeseY (eds) Human Rights and Disabled Persons. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 63–68.
23.
MarkelKSBarclayL (2009) Addressing the underemployment of persons with disabilities: Recommendations for expanding organizational social responsibility. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal21: 305.
24.
May-SimeraC (2018) Reconsidering sheltered workshops in light of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006). Laws7(6): 1–16.
25.
MégretF (2008) The disabilities convention: Towards a holistic concept of rights. The International Journal of Human Rights12(2): 261–278.
26.
MilewiczKHollwayJPeacockC, et al. (2018) Beyond trade: The expanding scope of the nontrade agenda in trade agreements. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(4): 743–773.
27.
MorinJ-FJinnahS (2018) The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance. Environmental Politics27(3): 541–565.
28.
MorinJ-FDürALechnerL (2018) Mapping the trade and environment nexus: Insights from a new data set. Global Environmental Politics18(1): 122–139.
29.
NotaLSantilliSGinevraMC, et al. (2014) Employer attitudes towards the work inclusion of people with disability. Journal of Applied Research Intellectual Disabilities27: 511–520.
30.
OliverM (1995) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. New York: Macmillan International Higher Education.
31.
QuinnGFlynnE (2012) Transatlantic borrowings: The past and future of EU non-discrimination law and policy on the ground of disability. The American Journal of Comparative Law60(1): 23–48.
32.
RodrikD (2018) What do trade agreements really do?Journal of Economic Perspectives32(2): 73–90.
33.
SchaafM (2011) Negotiating sexuality in the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Sur International Journal on Human Rights8(14): 113–131.
34.
ScullyJL (2013) Deaf identities in disability studies: With us or without us? In: WatsonNRoulstoneAThomasC (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–133.
35.
ShildrickM (2009) Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Cham: Springer.
36.
SimmonsBADobbinFGarrettG (2006) Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization60(4): 781–810.
37.
StienstraDChochinovHM (2006) Vulnerability, disability, and palliative end-of-life care. Journal of Palliative Care22(3): 166–174.
38.
TonelsonA (2002) The Race to the Bottom: Why a Worldwide Worker Surplus and Uncontrolled Free Trade Are Sinking American Living Standards. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
