This article argues for a non-reductive approach to translation as a basic social process that shapes both the world that sociologists study and the sociological endeavour itself. It starts by referring to accounts from the sociology of translation and translation studies, which have problematized simplistic views of processes of cultural globalization. From this point of view, translation can offer an approach to contemporary interconnectedness that escapes from both methodological nationalism and what can be designated as the monolingual vision, providing substantive perspectives on the proliferation of contact zones or borderlands in a diversity of domains. The article centrally argues for a sociological perspective that examines not just the circulation of meaning but translation as a process of linguistic transformation that is necessarily embodied in words. Only if this more material aspect of translation is attended to can the nature of translation as an ordinary social process be fully grasped and its intervention in meaning-making activities explored. This has far-ranging implications for any reflexive account of the production of sociological works and interpretations.
AlexanderJ. C. (2003). The meanings of social life. Oxford University Press.
2.
AngelelliC. V. (Ed.). (2014). The sociological turn in translation and interpreting studies. John Benjamins.
3.
ApterE. (2006). The translation zone. Princeton University Press.
4.
AsadT. (1986). The concept of cultural translation in british social anthropology. In CliffordJ.MarcusG. E. (Eds.), Writing culture (pp. 141–164). University of California Press.
5.
BaehrP. (2001). The ‘iron cage’ and the ‘shell as hard as steel’: Parsons, Weber, and the Stahlhartes Gehäuse metaphor in the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. History and Theory, 40(2), 153–169.
6.
BakerM. (2013). Translation as an alternative space for political action. Social Movement Studies, 12(1), 23–47.
7.
BakerM. (Ed.). (2016). Translating dissent: Voices from and with the Egyptian revolution. Routledge.
8.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination. University of Texas Press.
9.
BalibarÉ. (2002). Politics and the other scene. Verso.
10.
BalibarÉ. (2004). We, the people of Europe. Princeton University Press.
11.
BalibarÉ. (2010). At the borders of citizenship: A democracy in translation?European Journal of Social Theory, 13(3), 315–322.
12.
BassnettS.LefevereA. (1990). Translation, history and culture. Pinter.
BourdieuP. (2002). Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 145(décembre), 3–8.
27.
BrissetA. (2010). Cultural perspectives on translation. International Social Science Journal, 61(199), 69–81.
28.
BrissetA. (2017). Globalization, translation, and cultural diversity. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 12(2), 253–277.
29.
BuschB. (2017). Expanding the notion of the linguistic repertoire: On the concept of Spracherleben – The lived experience of language. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 340–358.
30.
CallonM. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of saint-Brieuc bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 196–233.
31.
CallonM.LatourB. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr-CetinaK.CicourelA. V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 277–303). Routledge.
GerhardtU. (2007). Much more than a mere translation – Talcott Parsons’s translation into English of Max Weber’s Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus: An essay in intellectual history. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32(1), 41–62.
51.
GhoshP. (1994). Some problems with Talcott parsons’ version of ‘the protestant ethic’. Archives Européennes De Sociologie, 35(1), 104–123.
52.
GibbR.Danero IglesiasJ. (2017). Breaking the silence (again): On language learning and levels of fluency in ethnographic research. Sociological Review, 65(1), 134–149.
53.
GibbR.TremlettA.Danero IglesiasJ. (Eds.). (2019). Learning and using languages in ethnographic research. Multilingual Matters.
54.
GodrejF. (2009). Towards a cosmopolitan political thought: The hermeneutics of interpreting the other. Polity, 41(2), 135–165.
55.
GodrejF. (2011). Cosmopolitan political thought. Oxford University Press.
56.
HeilbronJ. (1999). Towards a sociology of translation: Book translations as a cultural world-system. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(4), 429–444.
57.
HeilbronJ. (2010, February22–23). Structure and dynamics of the world system of translation. In International symposium ‘translation and cultural mediation’[Symposium]. UNESCO.
58.
HeldD.McGrewA.GoldblattD.PerratonJ. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Polity Press.
59.
HermansT. (1999). Translation in systems. St. Jerome Publishing.
60.
InghilleriM. (ed.) (2005). The Translator. Special issue on Bourdieu, 11(2).
61.
InghilleriM. (2017). Translation and migration. Routledge.
KoskinenK. (2014). Translating institutions: An ethnographic study of EU translation. Translating institutions: An ethnographic study of EU translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759760
64.
LabovW. (1978). Crossing the gulf between sociology and linguistics. The American Sociologist, 13(2), 93–103.
65.
LashS.UrryJ. (1994). Economies of signs and space. SAGE.
66.
LawJ.MolA. (2020). Words to think with: An introduction. Sociological Review, 68(2), 263–282.
67.
LefevereA. (1992). Translation, rewriting and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge.
68.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. The University of Chicago Press.
69.
MezzadraS.NeilsonB. (2013). Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Duke University Press.
70.
MignoloW. (2000a). The many faces of cosmo-polis: Border thinking and critical cosmopolitanism. Public Culture, 12(3), 721–748.
71.
MignoloW. D. (2000b). Local histories/global designs. Princeton University Press.
72.
MignoloW. D.SchiwyF. (2003). Transculturation and the colonial difference: Double translation. In Translation and ethnography: The anthropological challenge of intercultural understanding (pp. 3–29). Duke University and University of California.
73.
MolA. (2020). Not quite clean: Trailing schoon and its resonances. Sociological Review, 68(2), 385–400.
SakaiN. (1997). Translation and subjectivity. University of Minnesota Press.
87.
SapiroG. (2010). Globalization and cultural diversity in the book market: The case of literary translations in the US and in France. Poetics, 38(4), 419–439.
88.
SapiroG.SantoroMBaertP. (Eds.). (2020). Ideas on the move in the social sciences and the humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
89.
SayadA. (2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Polity Press.
90.
ScaffL. A. (2005). The creation of the sacred text: Talcott parsons translates the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Max Weber Studies, 5(2), 205–228.
91.
SchützA. (1976). The stranger. In SchützA.BrodersenA. (Eds.), Collected papers II: Studies in social theory (pp. 91–105). Martinus Nijhoff.
92.
SimeoniD. (1998). The Pivotal status of the translator’s habitus. Target, 10(1), 1–39.
93.
SpivakG. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. Routledge.
94.
SpivakG. C. (2012). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Harvard University Press.
95.
StegerM. B.JamesP. (2019). Globalization matters. Cambridge University Press.
96.
TempleB. (1997). Watch your tongue: Issues in translation and cross-cultural research. Sociology, 31(3), 607–618.
97.
TesseurW. (2017). The translation challenges of INGOs. Translation Spaces, 6(2), 209–229.
98.
TyulenevS. (2012). Applying Luhmann to translation studies. Routledge.
VenutiL. (2005). Translation, history, narrative. Meta L, 50(3), 800–816.
101.
VenutiL. (2008). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
102.
VenutiL. (2019). Contra instrumentalism. University of Nebraska Press.
103.
WagnerP. (2003). Handbook of historical sociology. In DelantyG.IsinE. F. (Eds.), Handbook of historical sociology (pp. 168–179). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-4973
104.
WilliamsR. (1981). Culture. Fontana.
105.
WilliamsR. (1989). Resources of hope: Culture, democracy, socialism. Verso.
106.
WolfM.FukariA. (Eds.). (2007). Constructing a sociology of translation. John Benjamins.
