Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Exploring the scientist stereotypes among a U.S. sample through an intersectional lens: How Black and White men and women (mis)align with scientist traits
Although stereotypical scientist traits are more associated with men than women, it is unclear how the addition of race could alter these effects. Specifically, Black women possess dual marginalized identities but also are perceived as more masculine than White women. Across four experiments (N = 1,115) with White and Black participants, we consistently found that participants believed society views White men as the most likely to possess scientist traits, followed by White women and then Black men and women. In Studies 2a (White participants) and 2b (Black participants), we found that although the trait content of the scientist stereotype was largely unique, the selected traits showed the most overlap with White men and the least overlap with Black men and women. These findings highlight the importance of considering gendered and racialized stereotypes in STEM, which may perpetuate disparities in these fields.
AlamA. (2024). Investigating socio-cultural factors contributing to gender disparities in STEM education. International Journal of Social Trends, 2(2), 1–9.
3.
BanchefskyS.WestfallJ.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
4.
BerdahlJ. L.MooreC. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
5.
BergstromV. N.CadieuxJ.ThakkarD.ChasteenA. L. (2024). Same view, different lens: How intersectional identities reduce Americans’ stereotypes of threat regarding Arab and Black men. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(2), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231153802
6.
BlockK.CroftA.SchmaderT. (2018). Worth less?: Why men (and women) devalue care-oriented careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01353
7.
BoucherK. L.FuestingM. A.DiekmanA. B.MurphyM. C. (2017). Can I work with and help others in this field? How communal goals influence interest and participation in STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00901
8.
Campbell-MontalvoR.KersaintG.SmithC. A. S.PucciaE.SkvoretzJ.WaoH.MartinJ. P.MacDonaldG.LeeR. (2022). How stereotypes and relationships influence women and underrepresented minority students’ fit in engineering. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), 656–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21740
9.
CarliL. L.AlawaL.LeeY.ZhaoB.KimE. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women ≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
10.
CartonA. M.RosetteA. S. (2011). Explaining bias against Black leaders: Integrating theory on information processing and goal-based stereotyping. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0745
11.
CasadB. J.PetzelZ. W.IngallsE. A. (2019). A model of threatening academic environments predicts women STEM majors’ self-esteem and engagement in STEM. Sex Roles, 80(7–8), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0942-4
12.
ChambersD. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
13.
ChenS. Y.HsuH. C. (2015). Nurses’ reflections on good nurse traits: Implications for improving care quality. Nursing Ethics, 22(7), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014547973
14.
CheryanS.MarkusH. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209
15.
CheryanS.SiyJ. O.VichayapaiM.DruryB. J.KimS. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218
16.
CheryanS.ZieglerS. A.MontoyaA. K.JiangL. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
17.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
18.
ColesS. M.PasekJ. (2020). Intersectional invisibility revisited: How group prototypes lead to the erasure and exclusion of Black women. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000256
19.
ConleyT. D.RabinowitzJ. L.RabowJ. (2010). Gordon Gekkos, frat boys and nice guys: The content, dimensions, and structural determinants of multiple ethnic minority groups’ stereotypes about White men. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01209.x
20.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
21.
DancyM.RaineyK.StearnsE.MickelsonR.MollerS. (2020). Undergraduates’ awareness of White and male privilege in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111002
24.
DiekmanA. B.BrownE. R.JohnstonA. M.ClarkE. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
25.
DiekmanA. B.ClarkE. K.JohnstonA. M.BrownE. R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199
26.
DiekmanA. B.SteinbergM.BrownE. R.BelangerA. L.ClarkE. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316642141
27.
DillJ.DuffyM. (2022). Structural racism and Black women’s employment in the U.S. health care sector. Health Affairs, 41(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01400
28.
DonnellyK.TwengeJ. M. (2017). Masculine and feminine traits on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 1993–2012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 76(9–10), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0625-y
29.
DonovanR. A. (2011). Tough or tender: (Dis)similarities in White college students’ perceptions of Black and White women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311406874
30.
DruryB. J.SiyJ. O.CheryanS. (2011). When do female role models benefit women? The importance of differentiating recruitment from retention in STEM. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.620935
31.
DudoA.BrossardD.ShanahanJ.ScheufeleD. A.MorganM.SignorielliN. (2010). Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research, 38(6), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384988
32.
EaglyA. H.NaterC.MillerD. I.KaufmannM.SczesnyS. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
33.
EatonA. A.SaundersJ. F.JacobsonR. K.WestK. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
34.
EddyS. L.BrownellS. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
35.
EleyD.EleyR.BertelloM.Rogers-ClarkC. (2012). Why did I become a nurse? Personality traits and reasons for entering nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(7), 1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05955.x
Else-QuestN. M.MineoC. C.HigginsA. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480694
38.
EomD.MolderA. L.TostesonH. A.HowellE. L.DeSalazarM.KirschnerE.GoodwinS. S.ScheufeleD. A. (2025). Race and gender biases persist in public perceptions of scientists’ credibility. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 11021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87321-z
39.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
40.
FreemanJ. B.PennerA. M.SapersteinA.ScheutzM.AmbadyN. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape race perception. PLoS One, 6(9), e25107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025107
41.
FreemanR. B.HuangW. (2015). Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1), S289–S318. https://doi.org/10.1086/678973
42.
GalinskyA. D.HallE. V.CuddyA. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24(4), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457783
43.
GhavamiN.PeplauL. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312464203
44.
GoffP. A.ThomasM. A.JacksonM. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4
45.
HallA. B.HuffC.KuriwakiS. (2019). Wealth, slaveownership, and fighting for the Confederacy: An empirical study of the American Civil War. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000170
46.
HallE. V.GalinskyA. D.PhillipsK. W. (2015). Gender profiling: A gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215580779
47.
HallE. V.HallA. V.GalinskyA. D.PhillipsK. W. (2019). MOSAIC: A model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Academy of Management Review, 44(3), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0109
48.
HallR. E. (2001). The ball curve: Calculated racism and the stereotype of African American men. Journal of Black Studies, 32(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470103200106
49.
HolroydE. A.BondM. H.ChanH. Y. (2002). Perceptions of sex-role stereotypes, self-concept, and nursing role ideal in Chinese nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02091.x
50.
HudsonS. T. J.MyerA.BerneyE. C. (2024). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the intersection of race and gender: An intersectional theory primer. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(2), e12939. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12939
51.
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S.FulliloveF.MowrerS. (2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926
KnutsonB. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02281954
54.
LaForceM.ZuoH.FerrisK.NobleE. (2019). Revisiting race and gender differences in STEM: Can inclusive STEM high schools reduce gaps?European Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), Article 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/5840
LeaperC.StarrC. R. (2019). Helping and hindering undergraduate women’s STEM motivation: Experiences with STEM encouragement, STEM-related gender bias, and sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318806302
57.
LeiR. F.Foster-HansonE.GohJ. X. (2023). A sociohistorical model of intersectional social category prototypes. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(5), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00165-0
58.
LipsH. M. (2003). The gender pay gap: Concrete indicator of women’s progress toward equality. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 87–109. https://doi-org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00016.x
59.
McKinnonM.O’ConnellC. (2020). Perceptions of stereotypes applied to women who publicly communicate their STEM work. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00654-0
60.
McPhersonE.BanchefskyS.ParkB. (2022). Trait stereotypes of scientists as analytical and cold align with perceptions of men more than women on both implicit and explicit measures. Social Cognition, 40(3), 228–258. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2022.40.3.228
61.
McPhersonE.ParkB.ItoT. A. (2018). The role of prototype matching in science pursuits: Perceptions of scientists that are inaccurate and diverge from self-perceptions predict reduced interest in a science career. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217754069
62.
MerrittR. D.HarrisonT. W. (2006). Gender and ethnicity attributions to a gender- and ethnicity-unspecified individual: Is there a people = White male bias?Sex Roles, 54(11–12), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9046-7
63.
MillerD. I.NollaK. M.EaglyA. H.UttalD. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender–science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of U.S. Draw-a-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
64.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
National Science Board. (2021, August 31). The STEM labor force of today: Scientists, engineers and skilled technical workers (NSB-2021-2). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20212
67.
NittrouerC. L.HeblM. R.Ashburn-NardoL.Trump-SteeleR. C. E.LaneD. M.ValianV. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115
68.
O’BrienL. T.BlodornA.AdamsG.GarciaD. M.HammerE. (2015). Ethnic variation in gender–STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: An intersectional approach. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 169–180. https://doi.org.10.1037/a0037944
69.
OngM.SmithJ. M.KoL. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21417
PietriE. S.JohnsonI. R.OzgumusE.YoungA. I. (2018). Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(2), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
74.
RaineyK.DancyM.MickelsonR.StearnsE.MollerS. (2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6
75.
RevensonT. A.GrivaK.LuszczynskaA.MorrisonV.PanagopoulouE.VilchinskyN.HagedoornM. (2016). Gender and caregiving: The costs of caregiving for women. In Caregiving in the illness context (pp. 48–63). Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558985_5
76.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709
77.
RosetteA. S.KovalC. Z.MaA.LivingstonR. (2016). Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.008
78.
RosetteA. S.LeonardelliG. J.PhillipsK. W. (2008). The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758
79.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239
80.
SchreinerC. (2006). Exploring a ROSE-garden: Norwegian youth’s orientations towards science—seen as signs of late modern identities. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.458
StangorC.SullivanL. A.FordT. E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9(4), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.4.359
83.
StarrC. R.LeaperC. (2023). Undergraduates’ pSTEM identity and motivation in relation to gender- and race-based perceived representation, stereotyped beliefs, and implicit associations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(8), 1774–1800. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221128235
WilliamsJ. E.BestD. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Sage.
86.
WingfieldA. H. (2007). The modern mammy and the angry Black man: African American professionals’ experiences with gendered racism in the workplace. Race, Gender & Class, 14(1/2), 196–212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41675204
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
