Two studies tested the impact of subtle cues that associate masculinity with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) success on women’s STEM experiences. Study 1 was a field study conducted in a university campus engineering building where photos of graduating classes were displayed. In Study 2, STEM majors viewed a mock website that depicted either exclusively male or mixed-gender STEM students. Across both studies, women reported greater fundamental need threat—a composite of threats to belonging, self-esteem, control, and meaningful existence—after viewing photos of exclusively male STEM students than did men. This gender effect disappeared when photos included female STEM students. Direct effects of gender and photo condition on career intentions were not observed, but indirect effects were obtained through need threat. Thus, because fleeting exposure to subtle background images associating STEM success with masculinity can negatively impact women’s fundamental needs, cues in academic environments should be carefully considered.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
3.
BernsteinM. J.ClaypoolH. M. (2012). Not all social exclusions are created equal: Emotional distress following social exclusion is moderated by exclusion paradigm. Social Influence, 7, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.664326
CeciS. J.GintherD. K.KahnS.WilliamsW. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236
6.
CheryanS.MeltzoffA. N.SaenamK. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57, 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
9.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
10.
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development (CAWMSET). (2000). Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science, engineering and technology. National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf
11.
DasguptaN. (2011). With a little help from my colleagues: Strengthening the stereotype inoculation model with insights from fellow psychologists. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.631872
12.
DiekmanA. B.ClarkE. K.JohnstonA. M.BrownE. R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
14.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representations in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
IannoneN. E.KellyJ. R.WilliamsK. D. (2018). “Who’s that?”: The negative consequence of being out of the loop on pop culture. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000120
18.
LatuI. M.MastM. S.LammersJ.BombariD. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavioral Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
21.
MillerD. I.EaglyA. H.LinnM. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender–science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
22.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109, 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
23.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.SriramN.LindnerN. M.DevosT.AyalaA.Bar-AnanY.BerghR.CaiH.GonsalkoraleK.KesebirS.MaliszewskiN.NetoF.OlliE.ParkJ.SchnabelK.ShiomuraK.Tudor TulbureB.WiersR. W.. . . GreenwaldA. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106
26.
SchmittM. T.DaviesK.HungM.WrightS. C. (2010). Identity moderates the effects of Christmas displays on mood, self-esteem, and inclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.026
27.
ShnabelN.Purdie-VaughnsV.CookeJ. E.GarciaJ.CohenG. L. (2013). Demystifying values-affirmation interventions: Writing about social belonging is a key to buffering against identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480816
28.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
29.
SteeleJ.JamesB. J.BarnetR. C. (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00042
30.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
33.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L.CwirD.SpencerS. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025731
34.
WaltonG. M.LogelC.PeachJ. M.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037461
35.
WesselmannE. D.CardosoF. D.SlaterS.WilliamsK. D. (2012). To be looked at as through air: Civil attention matters. Psychological Science, 23, 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427921
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 279–314). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
38.
WilliamsK. D.NidaS. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402480
39.
YeeD. K.EcclesJ. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children’s math achievement. Sex Roles, 19, 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289840
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
