Emotional expressions offer important social cues about the expresser’s intentions and risks or rewards in the environment. The current study investigated how individual differences in interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions (valence bias) are impacted by intergroup racial biases. In an online study of 409 racially diverse US participants, we found that across racial groups, participants judged in-group faces more positively than out-group faces regardless of expression (happy, angry, or surprised). Furthermore, valence bias generalized from a set of all-White faces to a set of racially diverse faces (Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White). Within the latter task, valence judgments differed as a function of stimulus model race, with more negative judgments of Asian and Black surprised faces. Thus, both individual valence bias and intergroup racial bias influenced emotion judgments, suggesting that these biases intersect in shaping social perceptions and decision-making.
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.MassonniéJ.FlittonA.KirkhamN.EvershedJ. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
2.
BasyouniR.HarpN. R.HaasI. J.NetaM. (2022). Political identity biases Americans’ judgments of outgroup emotion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 103, 104392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104392
3.
BijlstraG.HollandR. W.DotschR.HugenbergK.WigboldusD. H. J. (2014). Stereotype associations and emotion recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520458
4.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
ConleyM. I.DellarcoD. V.Rubien-ThomasE.CohenA. O.CerveraA.TottenhamN.CaseyB. (2018). The racially diverse affective expression (RADIATE) face stimulus set. Psychiatry Research, 270, 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.066
7.
ElfenbeinH. A.AmbadyN. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203
8.
ElfenbeinH. A.AmbadyN. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.276
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
10.
FreemanJ. B.JohnsonK. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
11.
GibsonB. L.RochatP.ToneE. B.BaronA. S. (2017). Sources of implicit and explicit intergroup race bias among African-American children and young adults. PLoS One, 12(9), e0183015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183015
12.
GoelevenE.De RaedtR.LeymanL.VerschuereB. (2008). The Karolinska directed emotional faces: A validation study. Cognition & Emotion, 22(6), 1094–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701626582
HarpN. R.BlairR. J. R.NetaM. (2023). Shift in valence bias associated with decrease in trait anxiety and depression symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 48, 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10437-x
15.
HarpN. R.BrownC. C.NetaM. (2021). Spring break or heart break? Extending valence bias to emotional words. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(7), 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620972296
16.
HarpN. R.FreemanJ. B.NetaM. (2022). Mindfulness-based stress reduction triggers a long-term shift toward more positive appraisals of emotional ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(9), 2160–2172. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001173
17.
HaxbyJ. V.HoffmanE. A.GobbiniM. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01330-0
18.
HoffmanK. M.TrawalterS.AxtJ. R.OliverM. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(16), 4296–4301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113
19.
HuC. S.WangQ.HanT.WeareE.FuG. (2017). Differential emotion attribution to neutral faces of own and other races. Cognition and Emotion, 31(2), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1092419
20.
HugenbergK. (2005). Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: Target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. Emotion, 5(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.267
HugenbergK.BodenhausenG. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15(5), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00680.x
23.
KarnadewiF.LippO. V. (2011). The processing of invariant and variant face cues in the Garner Paradigm. Emotion, 11(3), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021333
24.
KimM. J.MattekA. M.BennettR. H.SolomonK. M.ShinJ.WhalenP. J. (2017). Human amygdala tracks a feature-based valence signal embedded within the facial expression of surprise. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(39), 9510–9518. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1375-17.2017
25.
KunstmanJ. W.TuschererT.TrawalterS.LloydE. P. (2016). What lies beneath? Minority group members’ suspicion of Whites’ egalitarian motivation predicts responses to Whites’ smiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216652860
26.
LauA. S.FungJ.WangS.KangS.-M. (2009). Explaining elevated social anxiety among Asian Americans: Emotional attunement and a cultural double bind. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012819
LloydE. P.HugenbergK. (2021). Beyond bias: Response bias and interpersonal (in)sensitivity as a contributor to race disparities. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1820699
29.
MatsumotoD. (1993). Ethnic differences in affect intensity, emotion judgments, display rule attitudes, and self-reported emotional expression in an American sample. Motivation and Emotion, 17(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995188
30.
MatsumotoD.EkmanP. (1989). American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992959
31.
NetaM. (2024). Valence bias: Individual differences in response to ambiguity. In GrossJ.FordB. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion regulation (3rd ed., pp. 242–249). The Guilford Press.
32.
NetaM.BrockR. L. (2021). Social connectedness and negative affect uniquely explain individual differences in response to emotional ambiguity. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3870. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80471-2
33.
NetaM.KelleyW. M.WhalenP. J. (2013). Neural responses to ambiguity involve domain-general and domain-specific emotion processing systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00363
34.
NetaM.KimM. J. (2023). Surprise as an emotion: A response to Ortony. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221132789
35.
NetaM.NorrisC. J.WhalenP. J. (2009). Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion, 9(5), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016819
36.
NetaM.TongT. T. (2016). Don’t like what you see? Give it time: Longer reaction times associated with increased positive affect. Emotion, 16(5), 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000181
37.
NetaM.TongT. T.HenleyD. J. (2018). It’s a matter of time (perspectives): Shifting valence responses to emotional ambiguity. Motivation and Emotion, 42(2), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9665-7
38.
OngA. D.Fuller-RowellT.BurrowA. L. (2009). Racial discrimination and the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015335
39.
OttenS. (2016). The Minimal Group Paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.010
40.
ParkG.VaseyM. W.KimG.HuD. D.ThayerJ. F. (2016). Trait anxiety is associated with negative interpretations when resolving valence ambiguity of surprised faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1164. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01164
41.
PerdueC. W.DovidioJ. F.GurtmanM. B.TylerR. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.475
42.
PetroN. M.TongT. T.HenleyD. J.NetaM. (2018). Individual differences in valence bias: fMRI evidence of the initial negativity hypothesis. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(7), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy049
43.
PierceJ. E.HaqueE.NetaM. (2022). Affective flexibility as a developmental building block of cognitive reappraisal: An fMRI study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 58, 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101170
44.
Polanco-RomanL.MirandaR.HienD.AnglinD. M. (2021). Racial/ethnic discrimination as race-based trauma and suicide-related risk in racial/ethnic minority young adults: The explanatory roles of stress sensitivity and dissociation. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(7), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001076
45.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
46.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
47.
SellersR. M.CaldwellC. H.Schmeelk-ConeK. H.ZimmermanM. A. (2003). Racial identity, racial discrimination, perceived stress, and psychological distress among African American young adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(3), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519781
48.
TodorovA.OhD. (2021). The structure and perceptual basis of social judgments from faces. In GawronskiB. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 63, pp. 189–245). Academic Press.
49.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.MarcusD. J.WesterlundA.CaseyB.NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
50.
WeiM.HeppnerP. P.KuT.-Y.LiaoK. Y.-H. (2010). Racial discrimination stress, coping, and depressive symptoms among Asian Americans: A moderation analysis. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020157
Willadsen-JensenE. C.ItoT. A. (2008). A foot in both worlds: Asian Americans’ perceptions of Asian, white, and racially ambiguous faces. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207088037
53.
XieS. Y.FlakeJ. K.StolierR. M.FreemanJ. B.HehmanE. (2021). Facial impressions are predicted by the structure of group stereotypes. Psychological Science, 32(12), 1979–1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211024259
54.
YoungS. G.HugenbergK. (2010). Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 964–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020400
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
