Ambiguous stimuli are useful for assessing emotional bias. For example, surprised faces could convey a positive or negative meaning, and the degree to which an individual interprets these expressions as positive or negative represents their “valence bias.” Currently, the most well-validated ambiguous stimuli for assessing valence bias include nonverbal signals (faces and scenes), overlooking an inherent ambiguity in verbal signals. This study identified 32 words with dual-valence ambiguity (i.e., relatively high intersubject variability in valence ratings and relatively slow response times) and length-matched clearly valenced words (16 positive, 16 negative). Preregistered analyses demonstrated that the words-based valence bias correlated with the bias for faces, rs(213) = .27, p < .001, and scenes, rs(204) = .46, p < .001. That is, the same people who interpret ambiguous faces/scenes as positive also interpret ambiguous words as positive. These findings provide a novel tool for measuring valence bias and greater generalizability, resulting in a more robust measure of this bias.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt.
2.
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.MassonniéJ.FlittonA.KirkhamN.EvershedJ. K. (2019). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
3.
BalotaD. A.YapM. J.HutchisonK. A.CorteseM. J.KesslerB.LoftisB.NeelyJ. H.NelsonD. L.SimpsonG. B.TreimanR. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
BarrettL. F.LindquistK. A.GendronM. (2007). Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.003
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.DeWallC. N.ZhangL. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033
7.
BeeversC. G.WellsT. T.EllisA. J.FischerK. (2009). Identification of emotionally ambiguous interpersonal stimuli among dysphoric and nondysphoric individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(3), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-008-9198-6
ChandlerJ.MuellerP.PaolacciG. (2013). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavioral Research Methods, 46, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7
CikaraM.FiskeS. T. (2013). Their pain, our pleasure: Stereotype content and schadenfreude. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 52–59.
12.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.O’SullivanM.ChanA.Diacoyanni-TarlatzisI.HeiderK.KrauseR.LeCompteW. A.PitcairnT.Ricci-BittiP. E.SchererK.TomitaM.TzavarasA. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.712
13.
EllsbergD. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
14.
EysenckM. W.MoggK.MayJ.RichardsA.MathewsA. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.144
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
FlaganT.MumfordJ. A.BeerJ. S. (2017). How do you see me? The neural basis of motivated meta-perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(11), 1908–1917. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01169
18.
FreemanJ. B.JohnsonK. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
19.
FrijdaN. H. (1958). Facial expression and situational cues. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045562
20.
GreyS.MathewsA. (2000). Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 1143–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755937
21.
HaririA. R.TessitoreA.MattayV. S.FeraF.WeinbergerD. R. (2002). The amygdala response to emotional stimuli: A comparison of faces and scenes. NeuroImage, 17(1), 317–323.
22.
JoormannJ.WaughC. E.GotlibI. H. (2015). Cognitive bias modification for interpretation in major depression: Effects on memory and stress reactivity. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614560748
23.
King-CasasB.TomlinD.AnenC.CamererC. F.QuartzS. R.MontagueR. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108062
24.
KniefU.ForstmeierW. (2018). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/498931
25.
KolersP. A.DuchnickyR. L.SundstroemG. (1985). Size in the visual processing of faces and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(6), 726–751.
26.
KrieglmeyerR.DeutschR.De HouwerJ.De RaedtR. (2010). Being moved: Valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions. Psychological Science, 21(4), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610365131
27.
LangP.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual[Technical Report A–8]. University of Florida.
LundK.BurgessC. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204766
32.
LundqvistD.FlyktA.ÖhmanA. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces—KDEF (CD ROM). Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section.
33.
MaassA.SalviD.ArcuriL.SeminG. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 981–993.
34.
MacDonaldM. C.PearlmutterN. J.SeidenbergM. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
35.
MacraeC. N.MilneA. B.BodenhausenG. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 37–47.
36.
McGloneM. S.GilesH. (2011). Language and interpersonal communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication. SAGE Publications.
NetaM.CantelonJ.HagaZ.MahoneyC. R.TaylorH. A.DavisF. C. (2017). The impact of uncertain threat on affective bias: Individual differences in response to ambiguity. Emotion, 17(8), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000349
39.
NetaM.HarpN. R.HenleyD. J.BeckfordS. E.KoehlerK. (2019). One step at a time: Physical activity is linked to positive interpretations of ambiguity. PLoS One, 14(11), e0225106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225106
40.
NetaM.KelleyW. M.WhalenP. J. (2013). Neural responses to ambiguity involve domain-general and domain-specific emotion processing systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00363
41.
NetaM.NorrisC. J.WhalenP. J. (2009). Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion, 9(5), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016819
42.
NetaM.TongT. T. (2016). Don’t like what you see? Give it time: Longer reaction times associated with increased positive affect. Emotion, 16(5), 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000181
43.
NetaM.WhalenP. J. (2010). The primacy of negative interpretations when resolving the valence of ambiguous facial expressions. Psychological Science, 21(7), 901–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610373934
44.
NunnallyJ. C.FlaugherR. L. (1963). Psychological implications of word usage. Science, 140(3568), 775–781.
45.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087–11092.
46.
PennebakerJ. W.GraybealA. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93.
47.
PetersenS. E.FoxP. T.PosnerM. I.MintunM.RaichleM. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331(6157), 585–589.
48.
PetroN. M.TottenhamN.NetaM. (2019). Positive valence bias is associated with inverse frontoamygdalar connectivity and less depressive symptoms in developmentally mature children [Preprint]. bioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/839761
PlattM. L.HuettelS. A. (2008). Risky business: The neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2062
PosnerM. I.PetersenS. E.FoxP. T.RaichleM. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240(4859), 1627–1631.
53.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
54.
RightsJ. D.SterbaS. K. (2019). Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000184
55.
SatoN.NakamuraK.NakamuraA.SugiuraM.ItoK.FukudaH.KawashimaR. (1999). Different time course between scene processing and face processing: A MEG study. Neuroreport, 10(17), 3633–3637.
56.
SnyderM.SwannW. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1202–1212.
57.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30(1), 94–108.
58.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.MarcusD. J.WesterlundA.CaseyB. J.NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
59.
TropeY.ThompsonE. P. (1997). Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 229–241.
60.
WarrinerA. B.KupermanV.BrysbaertM. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
