For LGBTQ+ community members, one way to cope with the discrimination they experience is through a stronger ingroup identity. However, not all types of ingroup identity may be equally beneficial to LGBTQ+ individuals. A longitudinal (N = 1,044) and a cross-sectional (N = 8,464) study among LGBTQ+ people in Poland demonstrated that collective narcissism was a positive predictor of group-based anger (Study 2) and had a positive reciprocal relationship with group relative deprivation (GRD; Study 1), however, it was negatively related to life satisfaction and exhibited a stronger positive link with nonnormative than normative collective action. Secure LGBTQ+ identification was not longitudinally predicted by GRD (Study 1) and showed a weaker positive association with group-based anger (Study 2). It had a reciprocal positive relationship with life satisfaction and was a stronger predictor of normative than nonnormative collective action. These results show that whereas secure ingroup identity is a clearly positive coping mechanism, the effects of collective narcissism are mixed.
AbramsD.GrantP. R. (2012). Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x
2.
AdornoT. (1998). Critical models: Interventions and catchwords. Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1963)
3.
AgostiniM.van ZomerenM. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256
4.
BagciS. C.StathiS.Golec de ZavalaA. (2021). Social identity threat across group status: Links to psychological well-being and intergroup bias through collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000509
5.
BagciS. C.VerkuytenM.KocY.TurnukluA.PiyaleZ. E.BekmezciE. (2020). Being tolerated and being discriminated against: Links to psychological well-being through threatened social identity needs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 1463–1477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2699
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BeckerJ. C.TauschN. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
8.
BeckerJ. C.TauschN.WagnerU. (2011). Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211414145
9.
BestD.BeckwithM.HaslamC.Alexander HaslamS.JettenJ.MawsonE.LubmanD. I. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
10.
BourguignonD.TeixeiraC. P.KocY.OuttenH. R.FanikoK.SchmittM. T. (2020). On the protective role of identification with a stigmatized identity: Promoting engagement and discouraging disengagement coping strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2703
11.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
ChenowethE.StephanM. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.
15.
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
CichockaA.de ZavalaA. G.MarchlewskaM.BilewiczM.JaworskaM.OlechowskiM. (2018). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12328
18.
Cohen-ChenS.Van ZomerenM. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.016
19.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
20.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
21.
DingleG. A.StarkC.CruwysT.BestD. (2015). Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12081
22.
DoyleD. M.MolixL. (2014). Perceived discrimination and well-being in gay men: The protective role of behavioural identification. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.653689
23.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozinskiB.Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction predict opposite attitudes toward refugees via attribution of hostility. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901
24.
FeinbergM.WillerR.KovacheffC. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(5), 1086–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230
25.
FlandersC. E. (2015). Bisexual health: A daily diary analysis of stress and anxiety. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1079202
26.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction are associated with different emotional profiles and psychological wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00203
28.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
29.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
30.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
31.
Golec de ZavalaA.FedericoC. M.SedikidesC.GuerraR.LantosD.MrozińskiB.CypryańskaM.BaranT. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000260.supp
32.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420917703
33.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD.KeenanO. (2021). Collective narcissism and the motivational underpinnings of the populist backlash. In ForgasJ. P.CranoW. D.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of populism (pp. 105–122). Routledge.
34.
GórskaP.BilewiczM. (2015). When “a group in itself” becomes “a group for itself”: Overcoming inhibitory effects of superordinate categorization on LGBTQ individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 554–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12128
35.
GórskaP.BilewiczM.WiniewskiM. (2017). Invisible to the state: Institutional sexual stigma and collective action of LGB individuals in five East European countries. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216684646
36.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.MalinowskaK.LipowskaK.MarchlewskaM.BudziszewskaM.MaciantowiczO. (2020). Too great to act in solidarity: The negative relationship between collective narcissism and solidarity-based collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2638
37.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.MarchlewskaM.MateraJ.KocybaP.ŁukianowM.MalinowskaK.LipowskaK. (2022). Refugees unwelcome: Narcissistic and secure national commitment differentially predict collective action against immigrants and refugees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 86, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.11.009
38.
GórskaP.TauschN. (2022). People or ideology? Social conservatism and intergroup contact moderate heterosexuals’ responses to state-sponsored anti-LGBT campaigns. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00783-y
39.
GrantP. RAbramsD.RobertsonD. W.GarayJ. (2015). Predicting protests by disadvantaged skilled immigrants: A test of an integrated social identity, relative deprivation, collective efficacy (SIRDE) model. Social Justice Research, 28(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0229-z
40.
GreenawayK. H.CichockaA.van VeelenR.LikkiT.BranscombeN. R. (2016). Feeling hopeful inspires support for social change. Political Psychology, 37(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12225
41.
GwiazdaA. (2020). Right-wing populism and feminist politics: The case of Law and Justice in Poland. International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120948917
42.
HaslamC.JettenJ.CruwysT.DingleG.HaslamS. A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge.
43.
HaslamS. A.JettenJ.PostmesT.HaslamC. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x
44.
HerekG. M. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In HopeD. A. (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 65–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09556-1
45.
HerekG. M.CoganJ. C.GillisJ. R.GluntE. K. (1997). Correlates of internalized homophobia in a community sample of lesbians and gay men. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 2, 17–26.
46.
ILGA Europe. (2021). Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people in Europe and Central Asia 2021. https://www.ilga-europe.org/annualreview/2021
47.
JaskoK.WebberD.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM.TaufiqurrohmanM.HettiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2020). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000198
48.
JettenJ.HaslamS. A.CruwysT.GreenawayK. H.HaslamC.SteffensN. K. (2017). Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: Progressing the social cure research agenda. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(7), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2333
49.
JettenJ.HaslamC.HaslamS. A. (Eds.). (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press.
50.
JettenJ.HaslamC.HaslamS. A.DingleG.JonesJ. M. (2014). How groups affect our health and well-being: The path from theory to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12003
51.
JostJ. T.BeckerJ.OsborneD.BadaanV. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633
52.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
53.
KelleziB.BoweM.WakefieldJ. R.McNamaraN.BosworthM. (2019). Understanding and coping with immigration detention: Social identity as cure and curse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2543
54.
KelleziB.ReicherS. D. (2012). Social cure or social curse? The psychological impact of extreme events during the Kosovo conflict. In JettenJ.HaslamC.HaslamS.A. (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health and well-being (pp. 217–234). Psychology Press.
55.
KertznerR. M.MeyerI. H.FrostD. M.StirrattM. J. (2009). Social and psychological well-being in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: The effects of race, gender, age, and sexual identity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(4), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016848
56.
KlarM.KasserT. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well-being. Political Psychology, 30(5), 755–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00724.x
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersenA. (2007). Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X99360
59.
LeesJ.CikaraM. (2020). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
60.
LivingstoneA. G.YoungH.MansteadA. S. (2011). “We drink, therefore we are”: The role of group identification and norms in sustaining and challenging heavy drinking “culture”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210392399
61.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.JaworskaM.Golec de ZavalaA.BilewiczM. (2020). Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12367
62.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.ŁozowskiF.GórskaP.WiniewskiM. (2019). In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(6), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637
63.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.PanayiotouO.CastellanosK.BataynehJ. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 151–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732393
64.
MarchlewskaM.GórskaP.MalinowskaK.KowalskiJ. (2022). Threatened masculinity: Gender-related collective narcissism predicts prejudice toward gay and lesbian people among heterosexual men in Poland. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(7), 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1907067
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
68.
MeyerI. H. (2015). Resilience in the study of minority stress and health of sexual and gender minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000132
69.
MeyerI. H.FrostD. M. (2013). Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities. In PattersonC. J.D’AugelliA. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and sexual orientation (pp. 252–266). Oxford University Press.
70.
MeyerI. H.RussellS. T.HammackP. L.FrostD. M.WilsonB. D. (2021). Minority stress, distress, and suicide attempts in three cohorts of sexual minority adults: A US probability sample. PLOS ONE, 16(3), Article e0246827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246827
71.
MoleR.Golec de ZavalaA.ArdagM. (2021). Homophobia and national collective narcissism in populist Poland. European Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975621000072
72.
MooreD. (2003). Perceptions of sense of control, relative deprivation, and expectations of young Jews and Palestinians in Israel. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598460
73.
PetrocchiN.PistellaJ.SalvatiM.CaroneN.LaghiF.BaioccoR. (2020). I embrace my LGB identity: Self-reassurance, social safeness, and the distinctive relevance of authenticity to well-being in Italian lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0373-6
74.
PlöderlM.SellmeierM.FartacekC.PichlerE. M.FartacekR.KralovecK. (2014). Explaining the suicide risk of sexual minority individuals by contrasting the minority stress model with suicide models. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(8), 1559–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0268-4
75.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.NejiS.RychlowskaM.SchmidK.HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
76.
RosenbaumM. S.RamirezG. C.KimK. K. (2021). From overt to covert: Exploring discrimination against homosexual consumers in retail stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, Article 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102426
77.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
78.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
79.
RuncimanW. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. Routledge Kegan Paul.
80.
SalvatiM.KocY. (2022). Advancing research into the social psychology of sexual orientations and gender identities: Current research and future directions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2875
81.
SeligJ. P.LittleT. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). The Guilford Press.
82.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.Canetti-NisimD.UllrichJ. (2008). The role of acceptance and empowerment in promoting reconciliation from the perspective of the needs-based model. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2(1), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2008.00014.x
83.
ShumanE.Cohen-ChenS.Hirsch-HoeflerS.HalperinE. (2016). Explaining normative versus nonnormative action: The role of implicit theories. Political Psychology, 37(6), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12325
84.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
85.
SmithH. J.CroninT.KesslerT. (2008). Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members’ emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage. Political Psychology, 29(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00624.x
86.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825
87.
StrongeS.SenguptaN.BarlowF.OsborneD.HoukamauC.SibleyC. (2016). Perceived discrimination predicts increased support for political rights and life satisfaction mediated by ethnic identity: A longitudinal analysis. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000074
88.
StürmerS.SimonB. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690
89.
SubašićE.ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223
90.
SwankE.FahsB. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and race for sexual minorities who engage in gay and lesbian rights activism. Sex Roles, 68(11), 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0168-9
91.
SwankE.FahsB. (2016). Gay rights activism: Collection action frames, networks, and protesting among gays, lesbians, and bisexuals. Journal of Civil Society, 12(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1244983
92.
ŚwiderM.WiniewskiM. (Eds.). (2017). Sytuacja społeczna osób LGBTA w Polsce – raport za lata 2015–2016 [The social situation of LGBTA persons in Poland – report for the years 2015 and 2016]. Kampania Przeciw Homofobii.
93.
TajfelH.TurnerJ.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW.G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
94.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C. (2013). Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: A longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02109.x
95.
TauschN.BeckerJ. C.SpearsR.ChristO.SaabR.SinghP.SiddiquiR. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728
96.
ThomasE. F.LouisW. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510525
97.
ThomasE. F.MavorK. I.McGartyC. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
98.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563
99.
ThomasE. F.ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879111
100.
TompkinsE. (2015). A quantitative reevaluation of radical flank effects within nonviolent campaigns. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 38, 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20150000038004
van der LeijE. J. (2020). The mediating role of identity integration and basic psychological needs in the relationship between sexual orientation and mental health [Master’s thesis, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/400327
103.
Van ZomerenM. (2016). Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Political Psychology, 37, 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12322
104.
Van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835
105.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
106.
VignolesV. L.RegaliaC.ManziC.GolledgeJ.ScabiniE. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.308
107.
YılmazV.Göçmenİ. (2016). Denied citizens of Turkey: Experiences of discrimination among LGBT individuals in employment, housing and health care. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(5), 470–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12122
108.
ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Chicken or the egg? A cross-lagged panel analysis of group identification and group-based relative deprivation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219878782
109.
ŻukP.ŻukP. (2020). “Euro-Gomorrah and Homopropaganda”: The culture of fear and “Rainbow Scare” in the narrative of right-wing populists media in Poland as part of the election campaign to the European Parliament in 2019. Discourse, Context & Media, 33, Article 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100364
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
