Perceiving the ingroup as spiritually formidable—with inner strength and conviction—is strongly associated with the will to self-sacrifice. Yet, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Across five studies, we test a mechanism through which spiritual formidability operates: collective narcissism—the belief that the ingroup is exceptional but not sufficiently recognized by others. A preliminary study showed that collective narcissism, but not ingroup satisfaction, predicted costly pro-group sacrifices. Studies 1a and 1b revealed that, among inmates belonging to street gangs or delinquent bands, the perceived spiritual formidability of the ingroup was associated with collective narcissism and willingness to engage in costly pro-group sacrifices. In addition, the effect of perceived spiritual formidability on costly sacrifices was mediated by collective narcissism. Study 2 replicated and extended the effects to self-sacrifice for religion among imprisoned jihadists. Finally, Study 3 offered causal evidence of the mediation among members of the general population.
AtranS. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. Penguin.
2.
AtranS. (2020). Devoted actors and the will to fight and kill. In FriedI.BerthozA.MirdalG. M. (Eds.), The brains that pull the triggers: Syndrome E (pp. 113–140). Odile Jacob Press.
BagciS. C.AcarB.EryukselE.UstunE. G. (2022). Collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction in relation to collective action tendencies: The case of LGBTI individuals in Turkey. Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.3
5.
BagciS. C.StathiS.Golec de ZavalaA. (2021). Social identity threat across group status: Links to psychological well-being and intergroup bias through collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000509
BestaT.GómezÁ.VázquezA. (2014). Readiness to deny group’s wrongdoing and willingness to fight for its members: The role of poles’ identity fusion with the country and religious group. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.5114/CIPP.2014.43101
8.
BiddlestoneM.CichockaA.GłówczewskiM.CislakA. (2022). Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their in-group. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12569
9.
BlackJ. F. (2024). Socially sacred values define who we are. The New School for Social Research.
ChinchillaJ.GómezÁ. (2024). The exclusion-extremism link in non-WEIRD populations. In PfundmairM.HalesA. H.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), Exclusion and extremism: A psychological perspective (pp. 212–236). Cambridge University Press.
12.
ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.GómezÁ. (2022). Strongly fused individuals feel viscerally responsible to self-sacrifice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1067–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12526
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
CichockaA.CislakA.GronfeldtB.WojcikA. D. (2022). Can ingroup love harm the ingroup? Collective narcissism and objectification of ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1718–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211038058
17.
CichockaA.Golec de ZavalaA.MarchlewskaM.BilewiczM.JaworskaM.OlechowskiM. (2018). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality, 86, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12328
18.
CislakA.MarchlewskaM.WojcikA. D.ŚliwińskiK.MolendaZ.SzczepańskaD.CichockaA. (2021). National narcissism and support for voluntary vaccination policy: The mediating role of vaccination conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220959451
19.
DarwinC. (1871). The descent of men. John Murray.
20.
DeutschM.GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
21.
DurkeeP. K.GoetzA. T.LukaszewskiA. W. (2018). Formidability assessment mechanisms: Examining their speed and automaticity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.006
22.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozinskiB.Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction predict opposite attitudes toward refugees via attribution of hostility. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901
23.
EllemersN. (2017). Morality and the regulation of social behavior: Groups as moral anchors. Routledge.
24.
EllemersN.Van RijswijkW. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787011
25.
EllemersN.Van RijswijkW.RoefsM.SimonsC. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232007
26.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
27.
FedericoC. M.Golec de ZavalaA.BaranT. (2021). Collective narcissism, in-group satisfaction, and solidarity in the face of COVID-19. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620963655
28.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 24(5), 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612461508
29.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC.SnyderJ. K. (2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PLOS ONE, 7, e32751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032751
30.
FesslerD. M. T.MerrellW.HolbrookC.AckermanJ. (2023). Beware the foe who feels no pain: Associations between relative formidability and pain sensitivity in three U.S. online studies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.11.003
31.
FesslerD. M. T.TiokhinL.HolbrookC.GervaisM.SnyderJ. K. (2014). Foundations of the crazy bastard hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.003
32.
ForgasJ. P.LantosD. (2020). Understanding populism: Collective narcissism and the collapse of democracy in Hungary. In ForgasJ. P.CranoW. D.FiedlerK. (Eds.), Applications of social psychology (pp. 267–291). Routledge.
33.
GingesJ.AtranS.MedinD.ShikakiK. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(18), 7357–7360. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701768104
34.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of “in-group love.”Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x
35.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2024). The psychology of collective narcissism. Insights from social identity theory. Routledge.
36.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
37.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
38.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
39.
Golec de ZavalaA.Dyduch-HazarK.LantosD. (2019). Collective narcissism: Political consequences of investment of self-worth into an ingroup’s image. Advances in Political Psychology, 40, 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12569
40.
Golec de ZavalaA.FedericoC. M.SedikidesC.GuerraR.LantosD.MrozińskiB.CypryańskaM.BaranT. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by ingroup satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000260
41.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO.ZieglerM.MazurkiewiczM.Nalberczak-SkóraM.CiesielskiP.WahlJ. E.SedikidesC. (2024). Mindful-gratitude practice reduces prejudice at high levels of collective narcissism. Psychological Science, 35(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231220902
42.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420917703
43.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD.KeenanO. (2021). Collective narcissism and the motivational underpinnings of the populist backlash. In ForgasJ. P.CranoW. D.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of populism: The tribal challenge to liberal democracy (pp. 105–122). Routledge.
44.
Golec de ZavalaA.PekerM.GuerraR.BaranT. (2016). Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in–group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2067
45.
GómezA.AtranS.ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.López-RodrígezL.ParedesB.MartínezM.BlancoL.AlbaB.BautistaH.FernándezS.Pozuelo-RubioF.González-ÁlvarezJ. L.ChiclanaS.Valladares-NarganesH.AlonsoM.Ruíz-AlvaradoA.López-NovoJ. L.DavisR. (2022). Willingness to sacrifice among convicted Islamist terrorists versus violent gang members and other criminals. Scientific Reports, 12, 2596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06590-0
46.
GómezÁ.BélangerJ. J.ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.SchumpeB. M.NisaC. F.ChiclanaS. (2021). Admiration for Islamist groups encourages self-sacrifice through identity fusion. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8, 54. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00734-9
47.
GómezÁ.BrooksM. L.BuhrmesterM. D.VázquezA.JettenJ.SwannW. B.Jr. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022642
48.
GómezÁ.ChiclanaS.ChinchillaJ.BlancoL.AlbaB.BautistaH.Pozuelo-RubioF. (2023). The mirage of the jihad: Disenchantment as the pathway to disengagement of female jihadists. International Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 586–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2022.2096254
49.
GómezA.ChinchillaJ.VázquezA.López-RodríguezL.ParedesB.MartínezM. (2020). Recent advances, misconceptions, untested assumptions and future research agenda for identity fusion theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(6), e12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12531
50.
GómezÁ.López-RodríguezL.SheikhH.GingesJ.WilsonL.WaziriH.VázquezA.DavisR.AtranS. (2017). The devoted actor’s will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human conflict. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0193-3
51.
GómezÁ.TroppL. R.VázquezA.VociA.HewstoneM. (2018). Depersonalized extended contact and injunctive norms about cross-group friendship impact intergroup orientations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.010
52.
GómezÁ.VázquezA.AlbaB.BlancoL.ChinchillaJ.ChiclanaS.SwannW. B.Jr. (2024). Feeling understood fosters identity fusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(1), 118–134.
53.
GómezÁ.VázquezA.AtranS. (2023). Transcultural pathways to the will to fight. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 120(24), e2303614120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303614120
54.
GómezÁ.VázquezA.ChinchillaJ.BlancoL.AlbaB.ChiclanaS.González-ÁlvarezJ. (2023). Why is it so difficult to investigate violent radicalization?The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, e7. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.2
55.
GronfeldtB.CislakA.SterniskoA.EkerI.CichockaA. (2023). A small price to pay: National narcissism predicts readiness to sacrifice in-group members to defend the in-group’s image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221074790
56.
GuerraR.BierwiaczonekK.FerreiraM.Golec de ZavalaA.AbakoumkinG.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2022). An intergroup approach to collective narcissism: Intergroup threats and hostility in four European Union countries. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220972178
57.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guildford Press.
58.
HolbrookC.FesslerD. M.PollackJ. (2016). With God on our side: Religious primes reduce the envisioned physical formidability of a menacing adversary. Cognition, 146, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.011
59.
Ibn Khaldun. (1967). Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (RosenthalF. Trans.). Princeton University Press.
60.
Janoff-BulmanR.BharadwajP. (2017). The courage of one’s moral convictions: Exploring the two sides of heroism. In AllisonS. T.GoethalsG. R.KramerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of heroism and heroic leadership (pp. 547–560). Routledge.
61.
JaskoK.WebberD.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM.TaufiqurrohmanM.HettiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2020). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/psipi0000198
62.
KruglanskiA.BélangerJ. J.GunaratnaR. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press.
63.
LeachC. W.Van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
64.
LukaszewskiA. W.SimmonsZ. L.AndersonC.RoneyJ. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human status allocation. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 110(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000042
65.
MarintheG.CichockaA.CislakA.Alexander-GroseN.AzevedoF. (2022). Understanding identity processes in support for reactionary and progressive social movements among advantaged and disadvantaged groups: The role of collective narcissism and secure ingroup identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(7), 1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2885
66.
MashuriA.van LeeuwenE.ZaduqistiE.SukmawatiF.SakdiahH.HeraniI. (2022). The psychological antecedents of resistance to humanitarian aid. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(1), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220962179
67.
McCulloughM. (2020). The kindness of strangers: How a selfish ape invented a new moral code. Basic Books.
68.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. https://doi.org/1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
69.
SabucedoJ. M.DonoM.AlzateM.SeoaneM. G. (2018). The importance of protesters’ morals: Moral obligation as a key variable to understand collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 418. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418
70.
SchoemannA. M.BoultonA. J.ShortS. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379–386. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1948550617715068
71.
ScrivnerC.HolbrookC.FesslerD. M.MaestripieriD. (2020). Gruesomeness conveys formidability: Perpetrators of gratuitously grisly acts are conceptualized as larger, stronger, and more likely to win. Aggressive Behavior, 46, 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21907
72.
SheikhH.GingesJ.AtranS. (2013). Sacred values in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12275
73.
SheikhH.GómezÁ.AtranS. (2016). Empirical evidence for the devoted actor model. Current Anthropology, 57(S13), S204–S209. https://doi.org/10.1086/686221
74.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.SargisE. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895
SongJ. Y.CorcoranA.RidgeW.HandfieldT. (2025). Moral commitments as signals of trustworthiness: Interring character from sacred values [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5120222
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
79.
SwannW. B.Jr.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezÁ.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.AriyantoA.BestaT.ChristO.CuiL.FinchilescuG.GonzálezR.GotoN.HornseyM.SharmaS.SusiantoH.ZhangA. (2014). What majes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 106(6), 912–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036089
80.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezÁ.HuiciC.MoralesJ. F.HixonJ. G. (2010). Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: Arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 824–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020014
81.
SwannW. B.Jr.JettenJ.GómezÁ.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589
82.
SwannW. B.Jr.KleinJ.GómezÁ. (2024). Comprehensive Identity fusion theory (CIFT): New insights and a revised theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 275–332.
TossellC. C.GómezA.de VisserE. J.DonadioB.MetcalfeA.RoganC.DavisR.AtranS. (2022). Spiritual over physical formidability determines willingness to fight and sacrifice through loyalty in cross-cultural populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(6), e21113076119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113076119
86.
Van ProoijenA.EllemersN. (2015). Does it pay to be moral? How indicators of morality and competence enhance organizational and work team attractiveness. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12055
87.
VerkuytenM.KollarR.GaleJ.YogeeswaranK. (2022). Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217
YustisiaW.PutraI. E.KavanaghC.WhitehouseH.RufaedahA. (2020). The role of religious fundamentalism and tightness-looseness in promoting collective narcissism and extreme group behavior. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000269
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
