National narcissism and national identification, two distinct types of national commitment, differ in terms of their psychological concomitants. Therefore, in the current article, we hypothesized that they would also relate to different adult attachment styles. Namely, we proposed that national narcissism would be positively associated with higher attachment anxiety, while national identification would be associated with lower attachment anxiety and avoidance. These hypotheses were tested in three cross-sectional surveys (Study 1 N = 570; Study 3 N = 558; Study 4 N = 649) and one longitudinal survey (Study 2 N = 808). In all studies, we found a consistent positive relationship between attachment anxiety and national narcissism, and a negative relationship between attachment avoidance and national identification. Finally, we also demonstrated indirect effects of attachment anxiety (via national narcissism) on maladaptive group-related outcomes: conspiracy beliefs, non-normative collective action, and willingness to conspire.
AdamczykK.PilarskaA. (2012). Attachment style, relationship status, gender and relational competences among young adults. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 43(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-012-0007-4
2.
AdornoT.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.SanfordN. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
3.
AgroskinD.JonasE. (2013). Controlling death by defending ingroups—Mediational insights into terror management and control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1144–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.014
4.
BartholomewK.HorowitzL. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226
5.
BiddlestoneM.CichockaA.GłówczewskiM.CislakA. (2022). Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their in-group. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12569
CassidyJ.KobakR. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes. In BelskyJ.NezworskiT. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300–323). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.PaladinoM.-P.SacchiS. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282001
9.
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
CichockaA.DhontK.MakwanaA. P. (2017). On self-love and outgroup hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 31(4), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2114
12.
CichockaA.GolecdeZavalaA.MarchlewskaM.BilewiczM.JaworskaM.OlechowskiM. (2018). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12328
13.
CislakA.MarchlewskaM.WójcikA.ŚliwińskiK.MolendaZ.SzczepańskaD.CichockaA. (2021). National narcissism and support for anti-vaccination policy: The mediating role of conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220959451
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CollinsN. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 810–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810
DouglasK. M. (2021b). Are conspiracy theories harmless?The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, Article E13. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.10
19.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222
20.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
21.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
24.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25.
FunkeF. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00415.x
26.
GolecdeZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction are associated with different emotional profiles and psychological wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00203
27.
GolecdeZavalaA.CichockaA. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
28.
GolecdeZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
29.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
30.
GolecdeZavalaA.FedericoC. M.SedikidesC.GuerraR.LantosD.MrozińskiB.CypryańskaM.BaranT. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000260
31.
GórskaP.BilewiczM. (2021). Opposing effects of narcissistic and secure in-group identification on nonnormative collective action [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, University of Warsaw.
32.
GórskaP.MarchlewskaM.SzczepańskaD.MolendaZ.MichalskiP.FurmanA. (2022). A vicious circle? Longitudinal relationships between different types of in-group commitment and COVID-19 conspiracy thinking. The Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2111250
33.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.MalinowskaK.LipowskaK.MarchlewskaM.BudziszewskaM.MaciantowiczO. (2020). Too great to act in solidarity: The negative relationship between collective narcissism and solidarity-based collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2638
34.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.MarchlewskaM.MateraJ.KocybaP.ŁukianowM.MalinowskaK.LipowskaK. (2022). Refugees unwelcome: Narcissistic and secure national commitment differentially predict collective action against immigrants and refugees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 86, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.11.009
35.
GreenR.DouglasK. M. (2018). Anxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023
36.
GronfeldtB.CichockaA.MarchlewskaM.CislakA. (2021). Illiberal politics and group-based needs for recognition and dominance. In SajóA.UitzR.HolmesS. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of illiberalism (pp. 655–673). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367260569
37.
HofstraJ.van OudenhovenJ. P.BuunkB. P. (2005). Attachment styles and majority members’ attitudes towards adaptation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(5), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.009
38.
HorvathS.MorfC. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.011
39.
ImhoffR.DieterleL.LambertyP. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896491
40.
KernisM. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1569–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
41.
KossowskaM.HanuszK.TrejtowiczM. (2012). Skrócona wersja Skali Potrzeby Poznawczego Domknięcia: Dobór pozycji i walidacja skali [Short version of the need for cognitive closure: Item selection and scale validation]. Psychologia Społeczna, 7, 89–99.
42.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
43.
KowalskiJ.MarchlewskaM.MolendaZ.GórskaP.GawędaŁ. (2020). Adherence to safety and self-isolation guidelines, conspiracy and paranoia-like beliefs during COVID-19 pandemic in Poland–associations and moderators. Psychiatry Research, 294, Article113540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113540
44.
LockeK. D. (2009). Aggression, narcissism, self-esteem, and the attribution of desirable and humanizing traits to self versus others. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.003
45.
ŁowickiP.MarchlewskaM.MolendaZ.KarakulaA.SzczepańskaD. (2022). Does religion predict coronavirus conspiracy beliefs? Centrality of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 187, Article 111413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111413
46.
MarchlewskaM.CastellanosK. A.LewczukK.KoftaM.CichockaA. (2019). My way or the highway: High narcissism and low self-esteem predict decreased support for democracy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12290
47.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA. (2017). An autobiographical gateway: Narcissists avoid first-person visual perspective while retrieving self-threatening memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.003
48.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.FurmanA.CisłakA. (2022). Who respects the will of the people? Support for democracy is linked to high secure national identity but low national narcissism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(2), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12499
49.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.JaworskaM.GolecdeZavalaA.BilewiczM. (2020). Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12367
50.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.ŁozowskiF.GórskaP.WiniewskiM. (2019). In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(6), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637
51.
MarchlewskaM.GórskaP.MalinowskaK.KowalskiJ. (2022). Threatened masculinity: Gender-related collective narcissism predicts prejudice toward gay and lesbian people among heterosexual men in Poland. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(7), 1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.1907067
52.
MarchlewskaM.GórskaP.MolendaZ.LipowskaK.MalinowskaM. (2022). The fear of confession? High Catholic collective narcissism and low secure identification with Catholics predict increased pedophilia myths acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2907
53.
MarchlewskaM.HamerK.BaranM.GórskaP.KaniastyK. (2022). COVID-19: Why do people refuse vaccination? The role of social identities and conspiracy beliefs: Evidence from nationwide samples of Polish adults. Vaccines, 10(2), Article 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10020268
54.
MarshT.BrownJ. (2011). Homonegativity and its relationship to religiosity, nationalism and attachment style. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(3), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9286-2
55.
MichalskiP.MarchlewskaM.FurmanA.SzczepańskaD.PanayiotouO.MolendaZ.GórskaP. (2021). To advise and scrutinize the government? Two types of political knowledge, political trust and unconventional participation. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02561-2
56.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.97
57.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 53–152). Academic Press.
58.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
59.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2020). Enhancing the “broaden and build” cycle of attachment security in adulthood: From the laboratory to relational contexts and societal systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), Article 2054. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062054
60.
MilanovM.RubinM.PaoliniS. (2013). Adult attachment styles as predictors of different types of ingroup identification. Bulgarian Journal of Psychology, 1–4, 175–186.
61.
MolendaZ.MarchlewskaM.RogozaM. (2022). Nothing hurts like (in-group) love? National narcissism, conspiracy intentions, and non-prosocial managing emotions of others. Personality and Individual Differences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111947
62.
MullinB. A.HoggM. A. (1998). Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01176.x
63.
PaulhusD. L.RobinsR. W.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7
64.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
65.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
66.
RogozaM.MarchlewskaM.SzczepańskaD. (2022). Why dark personalities participate in politics?Personality and Individual Differences, 186, Article 111319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111319
67.
RomE.MikulincerM. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1220–1235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1220
68.
RothíD. M.LyonsE.ChryssochoouX. (2005). National attachment and patriotism in a European nation: A British study. Political Psychology, 26(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00412.x
69.
SchatzR. T.StaubE. (1997). Manifestations of blind and constructive patriotism: Personality correlates and individual–group relations. In Bar-TalD.StaubE. (Eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 229–245). Nelson-Hall Publishers.
70.
SeligT.LittleJ. P. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). Guilford Press.
71.
StoeberJ.KoboriO.BrownA. (2014). Examining mutual suppression effects in the assessment of perfectionism cognitions: Evidence supporting multidimensional assessment. Assessment, 21(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114534884
72.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2, 7–24.
73.
TurnerJ. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge University Press.
74.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.HofstraJ. (2006). Personal reactions to “strange” situations: Attachment styles and acculturation attitudes of immigrants and majority members. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.05.005
