Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset (N = 13,395), we track movement in internal and external motivations to respond without prejudice from 2004 to 2017. Internal motivation initially decreased before ticking upward following multiple events suggesting worsening race relations (e.g., noteworthy killings of unarmed Black men, resurgent racialized politics). Conversely, external motivation initially increased but reversed course across the same time span. A second dataset (N = 2,503) corroborates these trends in two conceptually related nonprejudiced motivations. Results suggest that changes in nonprejudiced motivations may reflect broader shifts in the sociopolitical climate.
AartsH.DijksterhuisA. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.18
American National Election Studies. (2016). ANES 2016 Time Series Study. [Data set]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36824.v2
4.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2008). Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.60
5.
AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.DevineP. G. (2003). Individual differences in the activation and control of affective race bias as assessed by startle eyeblink response and self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.738
BlanchardF. A.CrandallC. S.BrighamJ. C.VaughnL. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 993–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.993
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
10.
CheungH. K.HeblM.KingE. B.MarkellH.MorenoC.NittrouerC. (2017). Back to the future: Methodologies that capture real people in the real world. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709113
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359
13.
CrandallC. S.MillerJ. M.WhiteM. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
14.
DevineP. G.PlantE. A.AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.VanceS. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.835
15.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). Individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009
16.
EffronD. A.CameronJ. S.MoninB. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
18.
FazioR. H.HildenL. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275003
19.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
20.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2007). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In HoggM. A.CooperJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social psychology (pp. 123–145). SAGE.
21.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2014). The mode model. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). Guilford Press.
FiskeJ.HancockB. H. (2016). Media matters: Race & gender in US politics. Routledge.
25.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
30.
KahnK. B.MartinK. D. (2016). Policing and race: Disparate treatment, perceptions, and policy responses. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 82–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12019/full
31.
KaiserC. R.HagiwaraN.MalahyL. W.WilkinsC. L. (2009). Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027
32.
LaCosseJ.PlantE. A. (2019). Internal motivation to respond without prejudice fosters respectful responses in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000219
33.
LeachC. W.AllenA. M. (2017). The social psychology of the Black Lives Matter meme and movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417719319
34.
MadduxW. W.BardenJ.BrewerM. B.PettyR. E. (2005). Saying no to negativity: The effects of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002
35.
ManningM. (2011). When we do what we see: The moderating role of social motivation on the relation between subjective norms and behavior in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.589304
36.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.469
37.
MonteithM. J.WaltersG. L. (1998). Egalitarianism, moral obligation, and prejudice-related personal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298242007
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653
44.
OlsonM. A.ZabelK. L. (2016). Measures of prejudice. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 175–211). Psychology Press.
PlantE. A. (2004). Responses to interracial interactions over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264244
48.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
49.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1478
50.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G.CoxW. T. L.ColumbC.MillerS. L.GoplenJ.PerucheB. M. (2009). The Obama effect: Decreasing implicit prejudice and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 961–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.018
51.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G.PerucheM. B. (2010). Routes to positive interracial interactions: Approach-ing egalitarianism or avoiding prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1135–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210378018
52.
PoolG. J.SchweglerA. F. (2007). Differentiating among motives for norm conformity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701330983
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
SassenbergK.MatschkeC.SchollA. (2011). The impact of discrepancies from ingroup norms on group members’ well-being and motivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 886–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.833
58.
SchmidtK.AxtJ. R. (2016). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward African Americans and Barack Obama did not substantively change during Obama’s presidency. Social Cognition, 34, 559–588. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.6.559
59.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
60.
SmithL. G. E.ThomasE. F.McGartyC. (2015). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction: The identity–norm nexus. Political Psychology, 36, 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12180
61.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole.
62.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2017). The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 28, 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617709594
63.
TeslerM. (2013). The return of old-fashioned racism to White Americans’ partisan preferences in the early Obama era. The Journal of Politics, 75, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000904
64.
Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2001). On the origins of racial attitudes: Correlates of childhood experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272003
65.
Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relation between automatically activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239042
66.
Towles-SchwenT.FazioR. H. (2006). Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.003
VenablesL.FaircloughS. H. (2009). The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9116-y
69.
WoodW. (1999). Motives and modes of processing in the social influence of groups. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 547–570). Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
