The present endeavor examines whether paternalistic stereotypes, associating some low-status groups with low competence but high warmth, are always genuine. We propose that not all individuals are sincere in their evaluations as their judgments of warmth are likely driven by normative concerns. Study 1 (N = 201) confirmed the relationship between paternalistic stereotypes and perceived normative protection. Three additional studies manipulated participants’ beliefs about whether their true opinion could be uncovered or was socially expected. Specifically, individuals with high external motivation to respond without prejudice rated socially protected groups more harshly, especially on warmth, when they faced a bogus pipeline (Study 2, N = 160) or when norms emphasized honesty (Studies 3a and 3b, Ns = 137 and 247). These findings show the greater versatility of warmth compared to competence evaluations and provide new insights into why members of protected groups may continue to experience discrimination.
AbeleA. E.EllemersN.FiskeS. T.KochA.YzerbytV. (2021). Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychological Review, 128(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000262
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 195–255). Academic Press.
3.
BergsiekerH. B.LeslieL. M.ConstantineV. S.FiskeS. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1214–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027717
4.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.CherubiniP.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
5.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.RusconiP.GoodwinG. (2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 187–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
6.
CambonL.YzerbytV. Y. (2018). Two routes toward compensation: An investigation into the mechanisms of compensation for high-and low status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.002
7.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
8.
Clément-GuillotinC.RohmerO.ForestierC.GuillotinP.DeshayesM.d’Arripe-LonguevilleF. (2018). Implicit and explicit stereotypes content associated to persons with disability: Does sport can change anything?Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 38, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.014
9.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
10.
CrandallC. S.MillerJ. M.WhiteM. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
11.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
12.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.. . .ZieglerR. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 1–33. https://10.1348/014466608X314935
13.
CzoppA. M.KayA. C.CheryanS. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615588091
14.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to respond without prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009
15.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
16.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
17.
GanaG.BrechenmacherN. (2001). Structure latente et validité de la version française du self-monitoring scale: Échelle de monitorage de soi [Latent structure and validity of the French version of the self-monitoring scale]. Année Psychologique, 101(3), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2001.1338
18.
GranjonM.RohmerO.Popa-RochM.AubéB.SanreyC. (2023). Disability stereotyping is shaped by stigma characteristics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(6), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231208534
19.
HuY.PurolS. M.ShenY.ZhengY. (2024). Perceived racism and well-being in university racial/ethnic minority students: The complex roles of racial/ethnic identity and self-esteem. Current Psychology, 43, 37196–37207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07099-7
20.
IlmarinenV. J.IsotaloV.LönnqvistJ. E.von SchoultzÅ. (2022). Do politicians’ answers to voting advice applications reflect their sincere beliefs? Comparing publicly and confidentially stated ideological positions in a candidate-centred electoral context. Electoral Studies, 79, 102504.
21.
JansenW. S.OttenS.van der ZeeK. I. (2015). Being part of diversity: The effects of an all-inclusive multicultural diversity approach on majority members’ perceived inclusion and support for organizational diversity efforts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(6), 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214566892
22.
JeffriesC. H.HornseyM. J.SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M.BainP. G. (2012). The David and Goliath principle: Cultural, ideological, and attitudinal underpinnings of the normative protection of low-status groups from criticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212444454
23.
JonesE. E.SigallH. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031617
24.
KardesF. R.SanbonmatsuD. M.VossR. T.FazioR. H. (1986). Self-monitoring and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(4), 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167286124010
25.
KayA. C.DayM. V.ZannaM. P.NussbaumA. D. (2013). The insidious (and ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 287–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.003
26.
KervynN.FiskeS. T.YzerbytV. Y. (2015). Forecasting the primary dimension of social perception: Symbolic and realistic threats together predict warmth in the stereotype content model. Social Psychology, 46, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000219
27.
KleinO.SnyderM.LivingstonR. W. (2004). Prejudice on the stage: Self-monitoring and the public expression of group attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501697
28.
KochA.ImhoffR.UnkelbachC.NicolasG.FiskeS.TeracheJ.CarrierA.YzerbytV. Y. (2020). Groups’ warmth is a personal matter: Understanding consensus on stereotype dimensions reconciles adversarial models of social evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, Article 103995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103995
29.
MurrarS.CampbellM. R.BrauerM. (2020). Exposure to peers’ pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5
30.
NicolasG.BaiX.FiskeS. T. (2021). Comprehensive stereotype content dictionaries Using a semi-automated method. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2724
31.
NicolasG.FiskeS. T. (2023). Valence biases and emergence in the stereotype content of intersecting social categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(9), 2520–2543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001416
32.
NierJ. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205048615
33.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
34.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(6), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1478
35.
RoeseN. J.JamiesonD. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.363
36.
RohmerO.LouvetE. (2012). Implicit and explicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638536
37.
RohmerO.LouvetE. (2018). Implicit stereotyping against people with disability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 127–140. https://org/10.1177/1368430216638536
38.
RohmerO.PalomaresE. A.Popa-RochM. (2024). Attitudes towards disability and burnout among teachers involved in inclusive education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 71(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2022.2092078
39.
RuischB. C.FergusonM. J. (2023). Did Donald Trump’s presidency reshape Americans’ prejudices?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(3), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.013
40.
SchmitzM.YzerbytV. (2022). Direct and indirect dimensional compensation: Is there a difference between observers and group members?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220963176
41.
SnyderM. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
42.
SnyderM.KendzierskiD. (1982). Acting on one’s attitudes: Procedures for linking attitude and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90048-8
43.
StangorC.SechristG. B.JostJ. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201274009
44.
StankeF. A.KuperN.FetzK.EchterhoffG. (2024). Discriminatory, yet socially accepted? Targets’ perceptions of subtle and blatant expressions of ethno-racial prejudice. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, Article 1343514. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1343514
45.
TourangeauR.SmithT. W.RasinskiK. A. (1997). Motivation to report sensitive behaviors on surveys: Evidence from a bogus pipeline experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00629.x
46.
YzerbytV. Y. (2018). The dimensional compensation model: Reality and strategic constraints on warmth and competence in intergroup perceptions. In AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 126–141). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703663
47.
YzerbytV. Y.BarbedorJ.CarrierA.RohmerO. (2022). The facets of social hierarchy: How judges’ legitimacy beliefs and relative status shape their evaluation of assertiveness and ability. International Review of Social Psychology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.695
48.
YzerbytV. Y.CambonL. (2017). The dynamics of compensation: When ingroup favoritism paves the way for outgroup praise. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216689066
49.
YzerbytV. Y.KochA.BrambillaM.EllemersN.FiskeS. T.NicolasG. (2025). Dimensions of stereotypes about groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214251345489
