Following the 2016 U.S. Presidential election of Donald Trump, prejudice toward groups targeted during his campaign (e.g., Asian Americans, Mexicans) become more acceptable. By contrast, both Trump and Clinton voters reported less prejudice of their own. We conducted a 2024 conceptual replication, measuring perceived norms of prejudice and own-prejudice toward 128 groups, both before (N = 362) and after (N = 261) the U.S. election. We separately measured the negativity of Trump’s campaign rhetoric toward these groups (N = 188). Levels of prejudice and perceived norms of prejudice acceptability were mostly stable pre-/post-election, but Trump’s negative rhetoric predicted an increase in perceived acceptability of prejudice among targeted groups (replicating the 2016 results), and a rise in self-reported prejudice in the same groups post-election (reversing the 2016 results). Despite changes in the sociopolitical context between elections, the election of a leading politician who campaigned on prejudice was again associated with increases in the acceptability of prejudice.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
3.
AwadG. H.AmayrehW. M. (2015). Discrimination: Heightened prejudice post 9/11 and psychological outcomes. In AmerM. M.AwadG. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Arab American psychology (pp. 63–75). Routledge.
4.
BadaanV.JostJ. T. (2020). Conceptual, empirical, and practical problems with the claim that intolerance, prejudice, and discrimination are equivalent on the political left and right. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.007
5.
BianchiE. C.HallE. V.LeeS. (2018). Reexamining the link between economic downturns and racial antipathy: Evidence that prejudice against blacks rises during recessions. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1584–1597.
6.
BilewiczM.SoralW. (2020). Hate speech epidemic. The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Political Psychology, 41, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
7.
BlanchardF. A.CrandallC. S.BrighamJ. C.VaughnL. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 993–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.993
8.
BoboL. D. (2017). Racism in Trump’s America: Reflections on culture, sociology, and the 2016 US presidential election. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S85–S104.
9.
BonillaT.FilindraA.LajevardiN. (2022). How source cues shape evaluations of group-based derogatory political messages. The Journal of Politics, 84(4), 1979–1996. https://doi.org/10.1086/720308
10.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton-Mifflin.
CharlesworthT.BanajiM. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: IV. Change and stability from 2007 to 2020. Psychological Science, 33, 1347–1371.
13.
CharlesworthT. E.HatzenbuehlerM. L. (2024). Mechanisms upholding the persistence of stigma across 100 years of historical text. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 11069.
14.
CharlesworthT. E.SanjeevN.HatzenbuehlerM. L.BanajiM. R. (2023). Identifying and predicting stereotype change in large language corpora: 72 Groups, 115 years (1900–2015) and four text sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125, 969–990.
CohenJ. E. (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 87–107.
17.
CollingwoodL.LajevardiN.OskooiiK.A.R. (2018). A change of heart? Why individual-level public opinion shifted against Trump’s “Muslim Ban.”Political Behavior, 40, 1035–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9439-z
18.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.DayA. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
19.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446.
20.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378.
21.
CrandallC. S.FergusonM. A.BahnsA. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In StangorC.CrandallC. S. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Frontiers of Social Psychology (pp. 53–69). Psychology Press.
22.
CrandallC. S.MillerJ. M.WhiteM. H.II. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. Presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
FeinbergA.BrantonR.Martinez-EbersV. (2022). The Trump effect: How 2016 campaign rallies explain spikes in hate. PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001621
28.
GianiM.MéonP. G. (2021). Global racist contagion following Donald Trump’s election. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1332–1339.
29.
GoodwinR.KaniastyK.SunS.Ben-EzraM. (2017). Psychological distress and prejudice following terror attacks in France. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 91, 111–115.
30.
GrossmannM.ThalerD. (2018). Mass–elite divides in aversion to social change and support for Donald Trump. American Politics Research, 46(5), 753–784.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
34.
HodwitzO.MassingaleK. (2021). Rhetoric and hate crimes: Examining the public response to the Trump narrative. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 15(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2021.1936121
35.
HopkinsD. J. (2021). The activation of prejudice and presidential voting: Panel evidence from the 2016 US election. Political Behavior, 43(2), 663–686.
36.
HopkinsD. J.WashingtonS. (2020). The rise of Trump, the fall of prejudice? Tracking white Americans’ racial attitudes via a panel survey, 2008–2018. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 119–140.
37.
HswenY.XuX.HingA.HawkinsJ. B.BrownsteinJ. S.GeeG. C. (2021). Association of “#covid19” versus “#chinesevirus” with anti-Asian sentiments on Twitter: March 9–23, 2020. American Journal of Public Health, 111(6), 956–964. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306154
JardinaA. (2021). In-group love and out-group hate: White racial attitudes in contemporary U.S. Elections. Political Behavior, 43(4), 1535–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09600-x
41.
KeeleL.KellyN. J. (2006). Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 14(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj006
42.
LajevardiN.AbrajanoM. (2019). How negative sentiment toward Muslim Americans predicts support for Trump in the 2016 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/700001
Manganelli RattazziA. M.BobbioA.CanovaL. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013
46.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1trkhws
NelsonT. E.OxleyZ. M.ClawsonR. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.
49.
NewmanB.MerollaJ. L.ShahS.LemiD. C.CollingwoodL.RamakrishnanS. K. (2021). The Trump effect: An experimental investigation of the emboldening effect of racially inflammatory elite communication. British Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 1138–1159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000590
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243.
52.
PrimbsM. A.HollandR. W.MaatmanF. O.LansuT. A. M.FaureR.BijlstraG. (2024). The effects of the 2020 BLM protests on racial bias in the United States. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241269841
53.
RenyT. T.ValenzuelaA. A.CollingwoodL. (2020). “No, You’re Playing the Race Card”: Testing the effects of anti-black, anti-latino, and anti-immigrant appeals in the post-Obama Era. Political Psychology, 41(2), 283–302. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45295100
RuischB. C.FergusonM. J. (2022). Changes in Americans’ prejudices during the presidency of Donald Trump. Nature Human Behavior, 6, 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01287-2
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2017). The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617709594
ValcoreJ.RodgersJ.AsquithN. L. (2021). “We will build a great wall”: Domination, criminalization, and expatriation in Trump campaign and rally speeches. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.1647
63.
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.WhiteI. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117811
64.
ValentinoN.A.NeunerF.G.VandenbroekL.M. (2017). The changing norms of racial political rhetoric and the end of racial priming. The Journal of Politics, 80, 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/694845
65.
Warren-GordonK.RhinebergerG. (2021). The “trump effect” on hate crime reporting: media coverage before and after the 2016 presidential election. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 19(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2021.1895944
66.
WoodwardC. V. (1966). Seeds of failure in radical race policy. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 110(1), 1–9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/985998
67.
WrightF.WrightA. (2017). How surprising was Trump’s Victory? Notes on predictions in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2900394
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
