Research suggests that symmetry and complementarity are able to predict fit between an individual and a group. To date, fit has been described using knowledge, abilities, skills, values, personality, and the congruence between needs and their satisfaction. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze person–group fit based on the symmetric and complementary fit of prototypical attributes. Furthermore, we analyzed the mediating effects between symmetric and complementary fit as independent variables and the ability to perform, and well-being as dependent variables. The sample consisted of N = 20 soccer teams with a total of N = 294 athletes (age M = 23.6 years, SD = 4.4). Results demonstrated that symmetric and complementary fit are two distinct though correlated constructs. Moreover, identification is able to mediate the relation between symmetric fit and well-being as well as the relation between symmetric fit and an individual’s ability to perform.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043
BandalosD. L.FinneyS. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. New developments and techniques (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
5.
BezrukovaK.JehnK. A.ZanuttoE. L.ThatcherS. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20, 35–50. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0379
6.
BretzR. D.JudgeT. A. (1994). Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1003
7.
BrewerM. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 480–491). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
BrownR.CondorS.MatthewsA.WageG.WilliamsJ. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00230.x
9.
CableD. M.DeRueD. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884. doi:10.1037//0021–9010.87.5.875
10.
CableD. M.EdwardsJ. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822–834. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.5.822
11.
CableD. M.JudgeT. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
12.
CaplanR. D. (1987). Person–environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. doi:10.1016/0001–8791(87)90042-X
13.
CaplanR. D.CobbS.FrenchJ. R. P.HarrisonR. V.PinneauS. R. (1980). Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
14.
ChatmanJ. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person–organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279063
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: Rochester Press.
16.
DeRueD. S.HollenbeckJ. R. (2007). The search for internal and external fit in teams. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on fit in organizations. (pp. 259–285). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
EdwardsJ. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In CooperC. (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 283–357). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18.
EdwardsJ. R. (1992). A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17, 238–274. doi:10.5465/AMR.1992.4279536
19.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M.WilliamsonI. O.LambertL. S.ShippA. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person–environment fit. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.91.4.802
20.
EdwardsJ. R.CaplanR. D.HarrisonR. V. (1998). Person–environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
21.
EdwardsJ. R.ShippA. J. (2007). The relationship between person–environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on fit in organizations (pp. 209–258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
FrenchJ. R. P.RodgersW. L.CobbS. (1974). Adjustment as person–environment fit. In CoelhoG.HamburgD.AdamsJ. (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). New York, NY: Basic Books.
23.
GagnéM.RyanR. M.BargmannK. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 372–390. doi:10.1080/10413200390238031
24.
GiauqueD.ResenterraF.SiggenM. (2014). Antecedents of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and stress in a public hospital: A P–E fit perspective. Public Organization Review, 14, 201–228. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0215-6
25.
GuanY.DengH.RisavyS.BondM. H.LiF. (2011). Supplementary fit, complementary fit, and work-related outcomes: The role of self-construal. Applied Psychology, 60, 286–310. doi:10.1111/j.1464–0597.2010.00436.x
26.
HenryK. B.ArrowH.CariniB. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558–581. doi:10.1177/104649649903000504
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
28.
JehnK. A.NorthcraftG. B.NealeM. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054
29.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
30.
Kristof-BrownA. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person–job fit and person–organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00217.x
31.
Kristof-BrownA. L.BarrickM. R.StevensC. K. (2005). When opposites attract: A multi-sample demonstration of complementary person–team fit on extraversion. Journal of Personality, 73, 935–958. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2005.00334.x
32.
Kristof-BrownA. L.JansenK. J. (2007). Issues of person–organization fit. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on fit in organizations (pp. 123–154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
34.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
35.
LougheadT. M.HardyJ.EysM. A. (2006). The nature of athlete leadership. Journal of Sport Behaviour, 29, 142–158.
36.
MetcalfJ. (Ed.). (1998). Illustrated Oxford dictionary (Authorized ed. 1998 for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland). Zürich, Switzerland: Edition Olms.
37.
MuchinskyP. M.MonahanC. J. (1987). What is person–environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268–277. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1
38.
NielsenK.DanielsK. (2012). Enhancing team leaders’ well-being states and challenge experiences during organizational change: A randomized, controlled study. Human Relations, 65, 1207–1231. doi:10.1177/0018726711433312
39.
O’ReillyC. A.ChatmanJ. A.CaldwellD. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487–516. doi:10.2307/256404
40.
PervinL. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of the individual–environment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 56–68. doi:10.1037/h0025271
41.
PiasentinK. A.ChapmanD. S. (2006). Subjective person–organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.001
42.
PiasentinK. A.ChapmanD. S. (2007). Perceived similarity and complementarity as predictors of subjective person–organization fit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 341–354. doi:10.1348/096317906X115453
43.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
44.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
RavlinE. C.RitchieC. M. (2006). Perceived and actual organizational fit: Multiple influences on attitudes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 175–192.
47.
ReidS. A.HoggM. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 804–817. doi:10.1177/0146167204271708
48.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751–9004.2011.00355.x
49.
SargentL. D.Sue-ChanC. (2001). Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 32, 426–450. doi:10.1177/104649640103200403
50.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
51.
SeongJ. Y.Kristof-BrownA. L.ParkW. W.HongD.-S.ShinY. (2012). Person–group fit diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0149206312453738
52.
SteyerR.SchwenkmezgerP.NotzP.EidM. (1997). Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF) (The Multidimensional mental state questionnaire [MDBF]). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
53.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
54.
TajfelH. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In TajfelH. (Ed.), European monographs in social psychology: Vol. 14. Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61–76). London, UK: Academic Press.
55.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., Vol. 14, pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
Van KnippenbergD.de DreuC. K. W.HomanA. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
59.
Van KnippenbergD.HaslamS. A.PlatowM. J. (2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity, and group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 207–222. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.207
60.
WeylH. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
YuK. Y. T. (2009). Affective influences in person–environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of P–E fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1210–1226. doi:10.1037/a0016403
62.
ZeppC.KleinertJ.LiebscherA. (2013). Inhalte und Strukturen prototypischer Merkmale in Fußballmannschaften [Contents and structures of prototypical attributes in soccer teams]. Sportwissenschaft, 43, 283–290. doi:10.1007/s12662-013-0305-9
