We assessed the association between measures of dynamic visual acuity and a multiple object tracking task in physically active young adults. Ninety-four young adults performed the dynamic visual acuity and multiple object tracking tasks. Dynamic visual acuity was measured for horizontal and random walk motion paths at four target speeds (5, 10, 20, and 30°/s). For the multiple object tracking task, participants had to track three out of eight balls for 10 s, and the object speed was adjusted by a staircase procedure. We found that multiple object tracking performance was associated with better identification of horizontally and randomly moving targets in the dynamic visual acuity test (p < .001, r = −.35 [−.52, −.16]; and p < .001, r = −.52 [−.65, −.35]; respectively). This effect was consistent across all target speeds (all p-values<0.05). However, static visual acuity did not correlate with any measure of dynamic visual acuity or multiple object tracking (p > 0.170 in all cases). This study provides novel insights into the association between the ability to identify horizontally and randomly moving targets and track multiple objects. Future studies are needed to determine the potential utility of dynamic visual acuity for talent identification and predicting sports performance in real-game situations.
AlvarezG. A.FranconeriS. L. (2007). How many objects can you track?: Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.13.14
2.
AnsteyK. J.HorswillM. S.WoodJ. M.HatherlyC. (2012). The role of cognitive and visual abilities as predictors in the multifactorial model of driving safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45, 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.10.006
3.
AppelbaumL. G.EricksonG. (2018). Sports vision training: A review of the state-of-the-art in digital training techniques. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 160–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1266376
4.
AppelleS. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78(4), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033117
AtkinsonJ. (1992). Early visual development: Differential functioning of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways. Eye, 6(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1992.28
7.
BroadbentD.CauserJ.WilliamsA.FordP. (2015). Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: Future research directions. European Journal of Sport Science, 15(4), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.957727
8.
DørumE. S.AlnæsD.KaufmannT.RichardG.LundM. J.TønnesenS.SneveM. H.MathiesenN. C.RustanØGGjertsenØVatnS.FureB.AndreassenO. A.NordvikJ. E.WestlyeL. T. (2016). Age-related differences in brain network activation and co-activation during multiple object tracking. Brain and Behavior, 6(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.533
9.
EricksonG. B. (2007). Sports vision: vision care for the enhancement of sports performance. Elsevier Health Sciences.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
FergensonP.SuzanskyJ. (1973). An investigation of dynamic and static visual acuity. Perception, 2(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1068/p020343
13.
GeerI.RobertsonK. (1993). Measurement of central and peripheral dynamic visual acuity thresholds during ocular pursuit of a moving target. Optometry and Vision Science, 70(7), 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199307000-00006
14.
GibsonJ. J. (1947). Motion picture testing and research (No. 7). US Government Printing Office.
15.
HiranoM.HutchingsN.SimpsonT.DaltonK. (2017). Validity and repeatability of a novel dynamic visual acuity system. Optometry and Vision Science, 94(5), 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001065
16.
HughesP. K.BhundellN. L.WakenJ. M. (1993). Visual and psychomotor performance of elite, intermediate and novice table tennis competitors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 76(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.1993.tb05090.x
17.
IshigakiH.MiyaoM. (1993). Differences in dynamic visual acuity between athletes and nonathletes. Perceptualand Motor Skills, 77(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.1.35
18.
IshigakiH.MiyaoM. (1994). Implications for dynamic visual acuity with changes in age and sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.363
19.
JeffreysH. (1961). The theory of probability. Oxford University Press.
20.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE.-J. (2013). Bayesian Cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
21.
LevittH. (1971). Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375
22.
LongG.MayP. (1992). Dynamic visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for static and flickered gratings in a college sample. Optometry and Vision Science, 69(12), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199212000-00001
23.
LongG.VogelC. (1998). Predicting the “where” and resolving the “what” of a moving target: A dichotomy of abilities. Perception, 27(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1068/p270379
24.
MangineG. T.HoffmanJ. R.WellsA. J.GonzalezA. M.RogowskiJ. P.TownsendJ. R.JajtnerA. R.BeyerK. S.BohnerJ. D.PrunaG. J.FragalaM. S.StoutJ. R. (2014). Visual tracking speed is related to basketball basketball-specific measures of performance in nba players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2406–2414. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000550
25.
NakatsukaM.UedaT.NawaY.YukawaE.HaraT.HaraY. (2006). Effect of static visual acuity on dynamic visual acuity: A pilot study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(1), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.103.1.160-164
PlourdeM.CorbeilM. E.FaubertJ. (2017). Effect of age and stereopsis on a multiple-object tracking task. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0188373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188373
28.
PylyshynZ. W.StormR. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856888X00122
29.
QuevedoL.Aznar-CasanovaJ. A.Merindano-EncinaD.CardonaG.Solé-FortóJ. (2012). A novel computer software for the evaluation of dynamic visual acuity. Journal of Optometry, 5(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2012.05.003
30.
Quevedo-JunyentL.Aznar-CasanovaJ. A.Merindano-EncinaD.CardonaG.Solé-FortóJ. (2011). Comparison of dynamic visual acuity between water polo players and sedentary students. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(March 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.5641/027013611X13275192111664
31.
RomeasT.GuldnerA.FaubertJ. (2016). 3D-multiple object tracking training task improves passing decision-making accuracy in soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.002
32.
RoudaiaE.FaubertJ. (2017). Different effects of aging and gender on the temporal resolution in attentional tracking. Journal of Vision, 17(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/17.11.1
33.
SchneidersA. G.John SullivanS.RathboneE. J.Louise ThayerA.WallisL. M.WilsonA. E. (2010). Visual acuity in young elite motorsport athletes: A preliminary report. Physical Therapy in Sport, 11(2), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.01.001
34.
UchidaY.KudohD.MurakamiA.HondaM.KitazawaS. (2012). Origins of superior dynamic visual acuity in baseball players: Superior eye movements or superior image processing. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e31530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031530
35.
VaterC.KredelR.HossnerE. J. (2016). Detecting single-target changes in multiple object tracking: The case of peripheral vision. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(4), 1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1078-7
36.
WardP.Williamsa. (2003). Perceptual and cognitive skill development in soccer: The multidimensional nature of expert performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.1.93
37.
WeissmanS.FreeburneC. (1965). Relationship between static and dynamic visual acuity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022214
38.
WilliamsA. (2000). Perceptual skill in soccer: Implications for talent identification and development. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120113
39.
WilliamsA.EricssonK. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002
40.
WilliamsA.FordP. R.EcclesD. W.WardP. (2011). Perceptual-Cognitive expertise in sport and its acquisition: Implications for applied cognitive psychology. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1710
41.
ZinnW.SolomonH. (1985). A comparison of static and dynamic stereoacuity. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 56(9), 712–715. PMID: 4056294.
