Two studies examined the relationship between collective narcissism—an emotional investment in an unrealistic belief about the greatness of an in-group (Golec de Zavala, Cichocka, Eidelson, & Jayawickreme, 2009) — and anti-Semitism in Poland. The results indicate that this relationship is simultaneously mediated by (a) a belief that the in-group is constantly threatened by hostile intentions of other groups (Polish siege beliefs; Bar-Tal & Antebi, 1992a, 1992b) and (b) a belief that the Jews are a particularly threatening out-group because they secretly aim to dominate the world (the conspiracy stereotype of Jews; Bergmann, 2008; Kofta & Sędek, 2005). These results confirm that collective narcissism predicts prejudice against social groups perceived as threatening. Collective narcissists’ sensitivity to intergroup threat is composed of beliefs about vulnerability of the in-group and hostility of the out-group.
Bar-TalD. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Bar-TalD.AntebiD. (1992a). Siege mentality in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 251–275.
3.
Bar-TalD.AntebiD. (1992b). Beliefs about negative intentions of the world: A study of the Israeli siege mentality. Political Psychology, 13, 633–645.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BarrettP. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815–824.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2001). Narcissism as addiction to esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 206–209.
7.
BergmannW. (2008). Anti-Semitic attitudes in Europe: A comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 343–362.
8.
BilewiczM. (2007). History as an obstacle: Impact of temporal-based social categorizations on Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 551–563.
9.
BizmanA.YinonY. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191–196.
10.
BogardusE.S. (1925). Measuring social distances. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
11.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of out-group derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.
12.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
13.
BrittT.W.BonieckiK.A.VescioT.K.BiernatM.BrownL.M. (1996). Intergroup anxiety: A person × situation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1177–1188.
14.
BrownR. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.
BrownR.MarasP.MasserB.VivianJ.HewstoneM. (2001). Life on the ocean wave: testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 81–97.
16.
CohenR.GolubJ. L. (1991). Attitudes toward Jews in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia. A comparative survey. New York, NY: American Jewish Committee.
17.
CohrsJ. C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005). Personal values and attitudes toward war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 293–312.
18.
CorenblumB.StephanW. G. (2001). White fears and Native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 251–268.
19.
CrockerJ.ParkL. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392–414.
20.
CronbachL. J. (1961). Essentials of psychological testing, 2d ed.New York, NY: Harper & Row.
21.
de FigueiredoR. J. P.ElkinsZ. (2003). Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of ingroup pride. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 171–188.
22.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on out-group attitudes and their mediation by threat from competitiveness to out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
23.
EmmonsR. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.
24.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.
25.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
26.
FritzM. S.MackinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239.
27.
GoffP. A.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107.
28.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2007). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Paper presented at the ISPP 30th Annual Scientific Meeting, Portland, USA.
29.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA. (2011). Collective narcissism increases intergroup hostility in response to threat to the group’s positive image. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2011). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Revised manuscript submitted for publication.
31.
GolecA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096.
32.
GolecA.FedericoC. M. (2004). Understanding responses to political conflict: Interactive effects of the need for closure and salient conflict schemas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 750–762.
33.
GorsuchR. L.McFarlandS. G. (1972). Single versus multiple-item scales for measuring religious value. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53–64.
34.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.RosenblattA.VeederM.KirklandS.. (1990). Evidence for terror management II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.
35.
GrossJ. T. (2008). Fear: Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz. An essay in historical interpretation. New York, NY: Random House.
36.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J.MyersT. A. (2010). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In BucyE. P.HolbertR. L. (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures and analytical techniques. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
HinkleS.BrownR. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: some links and lacunae. In AbramsD.HoggM. (Eds.), Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
38.
ImhoffR.ErbH.-P.WohlM. (2010). Just a matter of history? The impact of ongoing consequences of the past on collective guilt. Manuscript in preparation.
39.
IslamM.HewstoneM. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950.
40.
JacksonJ. S.BrownK. T.BrownT. N.MarksB. (2001). Contemporary immigration policy orientations among dominant-group members in Western Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 431–456.
41.
JordanC.H.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.Hoshino-BrowneE.CorrellJ. (2003). Secure and defensive self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978.
42.
KernisM. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.
43.
KernisM. H.AbendT.ShriraI.GoldmanB. M.ParadiseA.HamptonC. (2005). Self-serving responses as a function of discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Self and Identity, 4, 311–330.
44.
KoftaM.SędekG. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 40–64.
45.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274.
46.
KruglanskiA.W.Bar-TalD.KlarY. (1993). A social cognitive theory of conflict. In LarsenK.S. (Ed.), Conflict and social psychology (pp. 45–56). London: Sage.
47.
KruglanskiA. W.OrehekE.BelangerJ.SasotaJ. (2010, October). Terrorists’ motivations as the quest for significance. Paper presented at Annual Conference of Society of Experimental Social Psychology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
48.
KrzemińskiI. (Ed.). (2004). Antysemityzm w Polsce i na Ukrainie. Raport z badań [Anti-Semitism in Poland and UkraineiA research report.]. Cracow: Scholar.
49.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
50.
LyonsP.A.KenworthyJ.B.PopanJ. R. (2010). Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of US citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1267–1280.
51.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.CaiL. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11, 19–35.
52.
McGregorH.LiebermanJ. DSolomonS.GreenbergJ.ArndtJ.SimonL., (1998). Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview threatening others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 590–605.
53.
McLarenL. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81, 909–936.
54.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unravelling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
PehrsonS.BrownR.ZagefkaH. (2009). When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist ingroup definitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 61–76.
57.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
58.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
59.
PyszczynskiT.AbdollahiA.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.WeiseD. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The Great Satan versus the Axis of Evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525–537.
60.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-component analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
61.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS.L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
62.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.
63.
SchatzR.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment:Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 154–174.
64.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
65.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK .A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A. (2002). Racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites: An integrated threat theory analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.
66.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–176.
67.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68.
StruchN.SchwartzS.H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personally and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373.
69.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
70.
TauschN.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.ChristO. (2007). Cross-community contact, perceived status differences and intergroup attitudes in Northern Ireland: The mediating roles of individual-level versus group-level threats and the moderating role of social identification. Political Psychology, 28, 53–68.
71.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
72.
WilliamsL. J.CoteJ. A.BuckleyM. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462–468.
73.
WójcikA. (2008). Historia stosunków polsko-żydowskich w oczach polskiej młodzieży [History of Polish-Jewish relationships in the eyes of polish youth]. In ŻyndulJ. (Ed.), Różni razem [Different together] (pp. 256–265). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
74.
WrightS.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of crossgroup friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
Zeigler-HillV. (2006). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: Implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability. Journal of Personality, 74, 119–143.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
