In four cross-sectional studies (N = 2,228; three preregistered), we hypothesized and found that U.S. American and White collective narcissism is associated with opposition to racial equality, whereas racial collective narcissism among Blacks and Latinx in the United States (US) is associated with support for racial equality. In Studies 1 and 2, American national and White racial collective narcissism was positively associated with support for state repression of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, antiegalitarianism, and legitimization of racial inequality. Black racial collective narcissism was negatively associated with the same variables. In Studies 3 and 4, American national and White racial collective narcissism was positively associated with antiegalitarianism, support for the alt-right movement, and opposition to policies to advance racial minorities. Latinx racial collective narcissism was negatively associated with the same variables. In sum, in the US, national collective narcissism among Whites and racial minorities and White racial collective narcissism hinder the pursuit of racial equality. However, Black and Latinx racial collective narcissism is associated with pursuit of racial equality.
AbramsD.GrantP. R. (2012). Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02032.x
2.
AgostiniM.van ZomerenM. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256
3.
BagciS. C.AcarB.EryukselE.UstunE. G. (2022). Collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction in relation to collective action tendencies: The case of LGBTI individuals in Turkey. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM29.1.3
4.
BagciS. C.StathiS.Golec de ZavalaA. (2023). Social identity threat across group status: Links to psychological well-being and intergroup bias through collective narcissism and ingroup satisfaction. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 29(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000509
5.
BocianK.CichockaA.WojciszkeB. (2021). Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, Article 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104098
6.
BrewerM. B.GonsalkoraleK.van DommelenA. (2013). Social identity complexity: Comparing majority and minority ethnic group members in a multicultural society. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212468622
7.
BursonE.GodfreyE. B. (2018). The state of the union: Contemporary interminority attitudes in the United States. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1520106
8.
CaricatiL. (2018). Considering intermediate-status groups in intergroup hierarchies: A theory of triadic social stratification. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.19
9.
ChaneyK. E.ForbesM. B. (2023). We stand in solidarity with you (if it helps our ingroup). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211067143
10.
CichockaA.BocianK.WiniewskiM.AzevedoF. (2022a). “Not racist, but. . .”: Beliefs about immigration restrictions, collective narcissism, and justification of ethnic extremism. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12813
11.
CichockaA.CislakA.GronfeldtB.WojcikA. D. (2022b). Can ingroup love harm the ingroup? Collective narcissism and objectification of ingroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(7), 1718–1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221103805
12.
CostelloT. H.BowesS. M.StevensS. T.WaldmanI. D.TasimiA.LilienfeldS. O. (2022). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341
13.
CraigM. A.BadaanV.BrownR. M. (2020). Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002
14.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026481
15.
DaschS. T.BellmM.ShumanE.van ZomerenM. (2024). The radical flank: Curse or blessing of a social movement?Global Environmental Psychology, 2, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.11121
16.
DevosT.MohamedH. (2014). Shades of American identity: Implicit relations between ethnic and national identities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(12), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12149
17.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.ThomaeM. (2017). The principle–implementation gap in attitudes towards racial equality (and how to close it). Political Psychology, 38(S1), 91–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12393
18.
DixonJ.McKeownS. (2021). Negative contact, collective action, and social change: Critical reflections, technological advances, and new directions. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12429
19.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozinskiB. (2021). Opposite associations of collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction with intergroup aggression via belief in the hedonistic function of revenge. PLoS One, 16(3), Article e0247814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247814
20.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozinskiB.GolecdeZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction predict opposite attitudes toward refugees via attribution of hostility. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01901
21.
Eddo-LodgeR. (2018). Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People about Race. Bloomsbury Circus.
22.
FedericoC. M.FarhartC.VitriolJ. A.Golec de ZavalaA. (2022a). Collective narcissism and perceptions of the (il)legitimacy of the 2020 US election. The Forum, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2022-2046
23.
FedericoC. M.Golec de ZavalaA.BuW. (2022b). Collective narcissism as a basis for nationalism. Political Psychology, 44(1), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12833
24.
FedericoC. M.Golec de ZavalaA. (2018). Collective narcissism in the 2016 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx048
25.
FedericoC.GolecdeZavalaA.BaranT. (2024). Rebels Without a Cause: Collective Narcissism and Political Contrarianism. Manuscript submitted
26.
ForscherP. S.KteilyN. S. (2020). A psychological profile of the alt-right. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619868208
27.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of “in-group love.”Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x
28.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2022). Conditional parochial vicarious ostracism: Gender collective narcissism predicts distress at the exclusion of the gender ingroup in women and men. Sex Roles, 87(5–6), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01315-z
29.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2023). The psychology of collective narcissism. Routledge.
30.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2024a). Authoritarians and “revolutionaries in reverse”: Why collective narcissism threatens democracy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(5), 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241240689
31.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2024b). Brighter sides of tribal exaggeration? Collective narcissism and tribal attitudes towards equality. In ForgasJ.CranoW.FiedlerK. (Eds.), The psychology of tribalism (pp. 126–145). Taylor & Francis.
32.
Golec de ZavalaA.BierwiaczonekK. (2021). Male, national, and religious collective narcissism predict sexism. Sex Roles, 84(11), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01193-3
33.
GolecdeZavalaA.BierwiaczonekK.CiesielskiP. (2022). An interpretation of meta-analytical evidence for the link between collective narcissism and conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101360
34.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
35.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032215
36.
Golec de ZavalaA.Dyduch-HazarK.LantosD. (2019). Collective narcissism: Political consequences of investment of self-worth into an ingroup’s image. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(S1), 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12569
37.
Golec de ZavalaA.FedericoC. M.SedikidesC.GuerraR.LantosD.MrozińskiB.CypryańskaM.BaranT. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000260
38.
Golec de ZavalaA.GuerraR.SimaoC. (2017). The relationship between the Brexit vote and individual predictors of prejudice: Collective narcissism, right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02023
39.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO. (2021). Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(2), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.69
40.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO. (2023). Collective narcissism in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. In KendeA.LášticováB. (Eds.), The psychology of politically unstable societies (pp. 119–136). Routledge.
41.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO. (2024). Gender and national collective narcissism: Gender asymmetries and obstacles to gender equality. Sex Roles, 90(4), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01443-8
42.
GolecdeZavalaA.FedericoC.BaranT. (2024a). Collective narcissism and authoritarianism on the Right and the Left. Manuscript submitted.
43.
Golec de ZavalaA.KeenanO.ZieglerM.MazurkiewiczM.Nalberczak-SkóraM.CiesielskiP.WahlJ. E.SedikidesC. (2024b). Mindful-gratitude practice reduces prejudice at high levels of collective narcissism. Psychological Science, 35(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231220902
44.
Golec de ZavalaA.LantosD. (2020). Collective narcissism and its social consequences: The bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420917703
45.
GolecdeZavalaA.PekerM.GuerraR.BaranT. (2016). Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in–group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2067
46.
GronfeldtB.CislakA.SterniskoA.EkerI.CichockaA. (2023a). A small price to pay: National narcissism predicts readiness to sacrifice in-group members to defend the in-group’s image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221074790
47.
GronfeldtB.CislakA.WyattM.CichockaA. (2023b). Party people: Differentiating the associations of partisan identification and partisan narcissism with political skill, integrity, and party dedication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(12), 1227–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13009
48.
GuerraR.BierwiaczonekK.FerreiraM.GolecdeZavalaA.AbakoumkinG.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2023). An intergroup approach to collective narcissism: Intergroup threats and hostility in four European Union countries. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220972178
49.
GuerraR.GolecdeZavalaA.SedikidesC.BierwiaczonekK.CiesielskiP.WidlshutT. (2024, in press). Misrecognition threat increases collective narcissism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
50.
GuimondS.DambrunM.MichinovN.DuarteS. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
51.
HaseA.BehnkeM.MazurkiewiczM.WieteskaK. K.Golec de ZavalaA. (2021). Distress and retaliatory aggression in response to witnessing intergroup exclusion are greater on higher levels of collective narcissism. Psychophysiology, 58(9), Article e13879. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13879
52.
HayesA.F.CaiL. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961
53.
HässlerT.UllrichJ.SebbenS.ShnabelN.BernardinoM.ValdenegroD.van LaarC.GonzálezR.VisintinE. P.TroppL. R.DitlmannR. K.AbramsD.AydinA. L.PereiraA.SelvanathanH. P.von ZimmermannJ.LantosN. A.SainzM.GlenzA.. . . PistellaJ. (2022). Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(4), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000365
54.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
55.
HodsonG.EarleM.CraigM. A. (2022). Privilege lost: How dominant groups react to shifts in cultural primacy and power. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(3), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211070524
56.
HongP. M.PeoplesC. D. (2021). The ties that mobilize us: Networks, intergroup contact, and participation in the Black Lives Matter movement. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12230
57.
HuddyL.del PonteA. (2019). National Identity, pride, and chauvinism – their origins and consequences for globalization attitudes. In GustavssonG.MillerD. (Eds.). Liberal nationalism and its critics: Normative and empirical questions (pp. 38-56). Oxford University Press.
58.
JaskoK.WebberD.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM.TaufiqurrohmanM.HettiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2020). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(6), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000198
59.
JostJ. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
60.
KeenanO.Golec de ZavalaA. (2021). Collective narcissism and weakening of American democracy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12274
61.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
62.
KrausM. W.OnyeadorI. N.DaumeyerN. M.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2019). The Misperception of Racial Economic Inequality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 899–921. 10.1177/1745691619863049
63.
LantosD.MoleR.Golec de ZavalaA. (2024). Born this way? National collective narcissism, implicit homophobia, and homosexual essentialism in populist poland. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024-02952-z
64.
LeachC. W.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
65.
LehmillerJ. J.SchmittM. T. (2007). Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 704–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.383
LordeA., (2017). Your silence will not protect you. London: Silver Press.
69.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
70.
MarintheG.CichockaA.CislakA.Alexander-GroseN.AzevedoF. (2022). Understanding identity processes in support for reactionary and progressive social movements among advantaged and disadvantaged groups: The role of collective narcissism and secure ingroup identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(7), 1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2885
71.
MaxwellC.SelvanathanH. P.HamesS.CrimstonC. R.JettenJ. (2024). A mixed-methods approach to understand victimization discourses by opposing feminist sub-groups on social media. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12785
72.
MikołajczakG.BeckerJ. C.IyerA. (2022). Women who challenge or defend the status quo: Ingroup identities as predictors of progressive and reactionary collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2842
73.
MoghaddamF. M. (2023). Political plasticity: The future of democracy and dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
MoleR. C. M.Golec de ZavalaA.ArdagM. M. (2021). Homophobia and national collective narcissism in populist Poland. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 62(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975621000072
76.
MolinaL. E.PhillipsN. L.SidaniusJ. (2015). National and ethnic identity in the face of discrimination: Ethnic minority and majority perspectives. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037880
77.
NacosB. L.ShapiroR. Y.Bloch-ElkonY. (2020). Donald Trump: Aggressive rhetoric and political violence. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(5), 2–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26940036
78.
ObaidiM.AnjumG.BierwiaczonekK.DovidioJ. F.OzerS.KunstJ. R. (2023). Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 120(20), Article e2213874120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213874120
79.
OrazaniS. N.LeidnerB. (2019). The power of nonviolence: Confirming and explaining the success of nonviolent (rather than violent) political movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2526
80.
OwuamalamC. K.CaricatiL.BonettiC. (2024). A large-scale test of the reality constraint and ingroup bias accounts of women’s support for male privilege. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 48(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231176222
81.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
82.
RadkeH. R. M.KutlacaM.SiemB.WrightS. C.BeckerJ. C. (2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320918698
83.
RapaL. J.BoldingC. W.JamilF. M. (2020). Development and initial validation of the short critical consciousness scale (CCS-S). Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 70, 101164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101164
84.
ReynaC.BellovaryA.HarrisK. (2022). The psychology of White nationalism: Ambivalence towards a changing America. Social Issues and Policy Review, 16(1), 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12081
RubinM.OwuamalamC. K.SpearsR.CaricatiL. (2023). A social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA): Multiple explanations of system justification by the disadvantaged that do not depend on a separate system justification motive. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(2), 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2046422
87.
SenguptaN. K.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2015). The status-legitimacy hypothesis revisited: Ethnic-group differences in general and dimension-specific legitimacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12080
88.
ShnabelN.UllrichJ. (2013). Increasing intergroup cooperation toward social change by restoring advantaged and disadvantaged groups’ positive identities. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.187
89.
ShumanE.SaguyT.van ZomerenM.HalperinE. (2021). Disrupting the system constructively: Testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(4), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000333
90.
ShumanE.van ZomerenM.SaguyT.KnowlesE.HalperinE. (2024). Defend, deny, distance, and dismantle: A new measure of advantaged identity management. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231216769
91.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204263968
92.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F. (2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0231-5
93.
StewartS.WillerR. (2022). The effects of racial status threat on White Americans’ support for Donald Trump: Results of five experimental tests. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(3), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211048893
94.
SzczepańskaD.MarchlewskaM.KarakulaA.MolendaZ.GórskaP.RogozaM. (2022). Dedicated to nation but against women? National narcissism predicts support for anti-abortion laws in Poland. Sex Roles, 87(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01303-3
95.
TeixeiraC. P.SpearsR.YzerbytV. Y. (2020). Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups’ reactions to low-status groups’ collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 919–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000195
96.
ThomasE. F.ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219879111
97.
UrbiolaA.McGartyC.Costa-LopesR. (2022). The AMIGAS model: Reconciling prejudice reduction and collective action approaches through a multicultural commitment in intergroup relations. Review of General Psychology, 26(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211056321
Van BerkelL.MolinaL. E.MukherjeeS. (2017). Gender asymmetry in the construction of American national identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(3), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317707710
100.
van ZomerenM.KutlacaM.Turner-ZwinkelsF. (2018). Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not)stand for: A further extension of the social identity model of collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 122–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347
101.
VerkuytenM.KollarR.GaleJ.YogeeswaranK. (2022). Right-wing political orientation, national identification and the acceptance of immigrants and minorities. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, Article 111217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111217
102.
VerkuytenM.YogeeswaranK. (2020). Cultural diversity and its implications for intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.010
103.
WestK.GreenlandK.van LaarC.BarnothD. (2022). It’s only discrimination when they do it to us: When White men use ingroup-serving double standards in definitional boundaries of discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2849
104.
YustisiaW.PutraI. E.KavanaghC.WhitehouseH.RufaedahA. (2020). The role of religious fundamentalism and tightness–looseness in promoting collective narcissism and extreme group behavior. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000269
105.
ZubielevitchE.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Chicken or the egg? A cross-lagged panel analysis of group identification and group-based relative deprivation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219878782
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
