Across three studies, we examined the role of self-evaluation in predicting conspiracy beliefs. Previous research linked the endorsement of conspiracy theories to low self-esteem. We propose that conspiracy theories should rather be appealing to individuals with exaggerated feelings of self-love, such as narcissists, due to their paranoid tendencies. In Study 1, general conspiracist beliefs were predicted by high individual narcissism but low self-esteem. Study 2 demonstrated that these effects were differentially mediated by paranoid thoughts, and independent of the effects of collective narcissism. Individual narcissism predicted generalized conspiracist beliefs, regardless of the conspiracy theories implicating in-group or out-group members, while collective narcissism predicted belief in out-group but not in-group conspiracies. Study 3 replicated the effects of individual narcissism and self-esteem on the endorsement of various specific conspiracy theories and demonstrated that the negative effect of self-esteem was largely accounted for by the general negativity toward humans associated with low self-esteem.
Abalakina-PaapM.StephanW. G.CraigT.GregoryW. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00160
2.
AngR. P.YusofN. (2006). Development and initial validation of the Narcissistic personality questionnaire for children: A preliminary investigation using school-based Asian sample. Educational Psychology, 26, 1–18. doi:10.1080/01443410500340942
3.
BilewiczM.WiniewskiM.KoftaM.WójcikA. (2013). Harmful ideas. The structure and consequences of anti-semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34, 821–839. doi:10.1111/pops.12024
4.
BrothertonR.FrenchC. C.PickeringA. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
5.
BruderM.HaffkeP.NeaveN.NouripanahN.ImhoffR. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
6.
CameronN. (1959). The paranoid pseudo-community revisited. American Journal of Sociology, LXV, 52–58.
7.
CiceroD. C.KernsJ. G. (2011). Unpleasant and pleasant referential thinking: Relations with self-processing, paranoia, and other schizotypal traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.002
8.
CichockaA.Golec de ZavalaA.MarchlewskaM.OlechowskiM. (2015). Grandiose delusions: Collective narcissism, secure in-group identification and belief in conspiracies. In BilewiczM.CichockaA.SoralW. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 42–61). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CichockaA.MarchlewskaM.Golec de ZavalaA.OlechowskiM. (in press). “They will not control us”: In-group positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjop.12158
10.
CongerA. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 35–46. doi:10.1177/001316447403400105
11.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR.BroadnaxS.BlaineB. E. (1999). Belief in US government conspiracies against blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941–953. doi:10.1177/01461672992511003
12.
CunninghamW. A.NezlekJ. B.BanajiM. R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1332–1346. doi:10.1177/0146167204264654
13.
DarwinH.NeaveN.HolmesJ. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289–1293, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
14.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 544–552. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
15.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.CallanM. J.DawtryR. J.HarveyA. J. (2015, 818). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning. doi:10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
16.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.JolleyD.WoodM. J. (2015). The social, political, environmental, and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In BilewiczM.CichockaA.SoralW. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200). New York, NY: Routledge.
FreudS. (2012). On narcissism: An introduction. In SandlerJ.Spector-PersonE.FonagyP. (Eds.), Freud’s “On narcissism: An introduction” (pp. 73–102). London, England: Karnac. (Original work published 1914)
20.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233–239. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
21.
FrommE. (2010). The heart of man: Its Genius for good and evil. Riverdale, NY: American Mental Health Foundation Books. (Original work published 1964)
22.
GoertzelT. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742.
23.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-semitism in Poland. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229. doi:10.1177/1368430211420891
24.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. doi:10.1037/a0016904
25.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 16–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
26.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019–1039. doi:10.1037/a0032215
27.
Grzesiak-FeldmanM. (2015). Are the high authoritarians more prone to adopt conspiracy theories? The role of right-wing authoritarianism in conspiratorial thinking. In BilewiczM.CichockaA.SoralW. (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 99–121). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
HorneyK. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
29.
HorvathS.MorfC. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1252–1258. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.011
30.
ImhoffR.BruderM. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43. doi:10.1002/per.1930
31.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014a). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56. doi:10.1111/bjop.12018
32.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M. (2014b). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9, e89177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
KoftaM.SedekG. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of Jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35, 40–64. doi:10.1080/00207659.2005.11043142
35.
KramerR. M. (1998). Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 251–275. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_3
36.
KramerR. M.SchafferJ. (2014). Misconnecting the dots: Origins and dynamics of out-group paranoia. In van ProoijenJ.-W.van LangeP. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia. Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 199–217). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
LockeK. D. (2009). Aggression, narcissism, self-esteem, and the attribution of desirable and humanizing traits to self versus others. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 99–102. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.003
38.
LukeM. A.MaioG. R. (2009). On the humanity! Humanity-esteem and its social importance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 586–601. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.001
39.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371
40.
MelleyT. (2002). Agency, panic and the culture of conspiracy. In KnightP. (Ed.), Conspiracy nation: The politics of paranoia in postwar America (pp. 57–81). New York: New York University Press.
41.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
42.
MuthénL. L.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
43.
PaulhusD. L.RobinsR. W.TrzesniewskiK. H.TracyJ. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 303–328. doi:10.1207/ s15327906mbr3902_7
44.
RaskinR.HallC. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590
45.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
46.
ReynoldsE. K.LejuezC. W. (2011). Narcissism in the DSM. In CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 14–21). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
47.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. doi:10.1177/0146167201272002
48.
RobinsR. S.PostJ. M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1126/science.148.3671.804
50.
StiegerS.GumhalterN.TranU. S.VoracekM.SwamiV. (2013). Girl in the cellar: A repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 297. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00297
51.
SwamiV. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
52.
SwamiV.ColesR.StiegerS.PietschnigJ.FurnhamA.RehimS.VoracekM. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
53.
SwamiV.FurnhamA. (2012). Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart. The Journal of General Psychology, 13, 244–259. doi:10.1080/00221309.2012.697932
54.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2004). Show your pride: Evidence for a discrete emotion expression. Psychological Science, 15, 194–197. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503008.x
55.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
56.
Van ProoijenJ. W.JostmannN. B. (2012). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1922
57.
Van ProoijenJ. W.Van LangeP. A. M. (2014). Power, politics, and paranoia: An introduction. In van ProoijenJ.-W.van LangeP. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58.
WhitsonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117. doi:10.1126/science.1159845
59.
WhitsonJ. A.GalinskyA. D.KayA. (2015). The emotional roots of conspiratorial perceptions, system justification, and belief in the paranormal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.002
60.
WilsonM. S.RoseC. (2014). The role of paranoia in a dual-process motivational model of conspiracy belief. In van ProoijenJ. W.van LangeP. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia (pp. 273–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
WulffE. (1987). Paranoid conspiratory delusion. In GraumannC. F.MoscoviciS. (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (pp. 171–90). New York, NY: Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
