We examined how rhetorical style affects evaluations of group advocates, and how these evaluations are moderated by group identification. University students were given a letter to the editor defending student welfare. The argument was either constructed using personal language (‘I believe’) or collective language (‘we believe’). Furthermore, the letter was either attributed to an official advocate (president of the student union) or an unofficial advocate (a rank-and-file member of the student body). Consistent with the social identity perspective, participants who showed strong identification as a university student thought that the group would feel better represented by official advocates using collective rather than personal language. Low identifiers, however, did not rate the rhetorical styles differently on representativeness. Furthermore, low identifiers (but not high identifiers) rated official advocates as more likable and more effective when they used personal rather than collective language. The discussion focuses on the conflict low identifiers might feel between (a) needing to homogenize with other group members in order to maximize the influence and political effectiveness of their message at the collective level, and (b) protecting themselves against categorization threat.
Barreto, M. , & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629-639 .
2.
Branscombe, N. , & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 243-266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
3.
Branscombe, N. , Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears , and B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
4.
Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482 .
5.
Brewer, M. B. , & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this ‘We’? Levels of collective identity and self representations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93 .
6.
Cronkhite, G. , & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility . Communication Monographs, 43, 91-107 .
7.
Eagly, A. H. , Wood, W. , & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435 .
8.
Fielding, K. S. , & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 39-51 .
9.
Hains, S. C. , Hogg, M. A. , & Duck, J. M. (1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087-1100 .
10.
Haslam, S. A. , McGarty, C. , Brown, P. M. , Eggins, R. A. , Morrison, B. E. , & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). Inspecting the emperor’s clothes: Evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 168-184 .
11.
Haslam, S. A. , Turner, J. C. , Oakes, P. J. , McGarty, C. , & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context dependent variation in social stereotyping I: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20 .
12.
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200 .
13.
Hogg, M. A. (2002). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tagney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York: Guilford .
14.
Hogg, M. A. , Hains, S. C. , & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263 .
15.
Hopkins, N. , & Reicher, S. (1996). The construction of social categories and processes of social change: Arguing about national identities. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 69-93). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann .
16.
Hornsey, M. J , & Hogg, M. A. (2000a). A comparison of the mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256 .
17.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000b). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156 .
18.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000c). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 948-958 .
19.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2002). The effects of status on subgroup relations . British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 203-218 .
20.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Jetten, J. (2003). Not being what you claim to be: Impostors as sources of group threat . European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 639-657 .
21.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264 .
22.
Hornsey, M. J. , Oppes, T. , & Svensson, A. (2002). ‘It’s ok if we say it, but you can’t’: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism . European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307 .
23.
Kelly, C. , & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis .
24.
Maass, A. , & Clark, R. D., III (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research . Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450 .
25.
Mackie, D. M. , Worth, L. T. , & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822 .
26.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press .
27.
Mugny, G. , & Perez, J. A. (1991). The social psychology of minority influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
28.
Mummendey, A. , & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174 .
29.
Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
30.
Platow, M. J. , Reid, S. , & Andrew, S. (1998). Leadership endorsement: The role of distributive and procedural behavior in interpersonal and intergroup contexts . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 35-47 .
31.
Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric . British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 325-344 .
32.
Reicher, S. , & Hopkins, N. (1996a). Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric . British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 297-311 .
33.
Reicher, S. , & Hopkins, N. (1996b). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher’s and Kinnock’s speeches concerning the British miners’ strike (1984-5) . European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 353-371 .
34.
Reicher, S. , & Hopkins, N. (2001). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization . Political Psychology, 22, 383-407 .
35.
Sani, F. , & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party . European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645 .
36.
Sani, F. , & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England . British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 95-112 .
37.
Simon, B. (1997). Self and group in modern society: Ten theses on the individual self and the collective self. In R. Spears , P. J. Oakes , N. Ellemers , & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 318-335). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
38.
Simon, B. , & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis . American Psychologist, 56, 319-331 .
39.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
40.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press .
41.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears , & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment and content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
42.
Turner, J. C. , & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
43.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
44.
Turner, J. C. , Oakes, P. J. , Haslam, S. A. , & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463 .
45.
van Knippenberg, A. , Lossie, N. , & Wilke, H. (1994). In-group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing . British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 280-300 .
46.
van Vugt, M. , & de Cremer, D. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 587-599 .
