Communication assistance is a form of specialist support for witnesses and defendants in justice settings who have been identified as having communication difficulties. This relatively new role in New Zealand is modelled on the role of the intermediary in England and Wales. This research provides a qualitative analysis of professionals’ perspectives (n = 28 participants) on the challenges of communication assistance for young people facing criminal charges in the New Zealand youth justice system. The findings of this study do not question whether or not communication assistance should exist, but rather how it might best function in practice. The overall implications are that more education and guidance for youth justice professionals is needed.
BevanM (2018) Supporting vulnerable suspects through the investigation stage. Paper presented at the Vulnerability and Justice conference, University of London, London.
2.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
3.
CashmoreJKatzIShackelRValentineK (2017) Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot: Process Evaluation Report. Sydney, Australia: Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW.
4.
CashmoreJShackelR (2018) Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot: Final Outcome Evaluation Report. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
5.
CollinsKHarkerNAntonopoulosGA (2017) The impact of the registered intermediary on adults’ perceptions of child witnesses: Evidence from a mock cross examination. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research23(2): 211–225.
6.
CooperPBackenPMarchantR (2015) Getting to grips with ground rules hearings: A checklist for judges, advocates and intermediaries to promote the fair treatment of vulnerable people in court. Criminal Law Review2015(6): 420–435.
7.
CooperPMattisonM (2017) Intermediaries, vulnerable people and the quality of evidence: An international comparison of three versions of the English intermediary model. International Journal of Evidence and Proof21(4): 351–370.
8.
CooperPWurtzelD (2013) A day late and a dollar short: In search of an intermediary scheme for vulnerable defendants in England and Wales. Criminal Law Review2013(1): 4–22.
9.
CooperPWurtzelD (2014) Better the second time around? Department of justice registered intermediaries schemes and lessons from England and Wales. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly65(1): 39–61.
10.
CourtenayM (2018) An overview of nurse prescribing in the UK. Nursing Standarde11078.
11.
Criminal Justice Joint Inspection (2014) Achieving Best Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Joint Inspection. London: HMCPSI Publications.
12.
Crown Law (2019) Solicitor-General’s Guidelines for Prosecuting Sexual Violence. Wellington: Crown Law.
13.
DaviesEHannaKHendersonEHandL (2011) Questioning Child Witnesses. Auckland: Institute of Public Policy, AUT University.
14.
Department of Justice (Northern Ireland) (2015) Northern Ireland Registered Intermediaries Schemes Pilot Project: Post-Project Review. Belfast: Department of Justice (Northern Ireland).
15.
Department of Justice (Northern Ireland) (2016) Northern Ireland Registered Intermediaries Schemes Pilot Project: Phase II Review. Belfast: Northern Ireland Department of Justice.
16.
GastonF (2017) Young people’s comprehension of the rights caution in New Zealand. Unpublished master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
17.
HannaKDaviesEHendersonECrothersCRotherhamC (2010) Child Witnesses in the New Zealand Criminal Courts: A Review of Practice and Implications for Policy. Auckland: Institute of Public Policy, AUT University.
18.
HendersonE (2015) A very valuable tool: Judges, advocates and intermediaries discuss the intermediary system in England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof19(3): 154–171.
HenryLACraneLNashGHobsonZKirke-SmithMWilcockR (2017) Verbal, visual, and intermediary support for child witnesses with autism during investigative interviews. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders47(8): 2348–2362.
22.
HenwoodCStratfordS (2014) New Zealand’s Gift to the World: The Youth Justice Family Group Conference. Wellington: The Henwood Trust.
23.
HowardKMcCannCDudleyM (2019a) What is communication assistance? Describing a new and emerging profession in the New Zealand youth justice system. Manuscript under review, University of Auckland.
24.
HowardKMcCannCDudleyM (2019b) ‘It’s really good, much needed, why hasn’t it happened earlier?’ Professionals’ perspectives on the benefits of communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. Manuscript under review, University of Auckland.
25.
HowardKMcCannCEwingADudleyMBrookbanksW (2019c) Two legal concepts collide: the intersection of fitness to stand trial and communication assistance enquiries. Manuscript under review, University of Auckland.
26.
HoyanoLRaffertyA (2017) Rationing defence intermediaries under the April 2016 criminal practice direction. Criminal Law Review2017(2): 93–105.
27.
Law Commission (England and Wales) (2016) Unfitness to Plead: Volume 1. London: Law Commission (England and Wales).
28.
LountSAHandLPurdySFranceA (2018) Tough talk: Youth offender’s perceptions of communicating in the youth justice system in New Zealand. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology54(1): 593–618.
29.
MantheiRStanleyPGibsonK (2004) Counselling and counselling psychology in New Zealand: Similarities and differences. New Zealand Journal of Counselling25(1): 48–69.
30.
MetzgerNSavaiiKMcKeeAKedgeS (2018) Youth Voices about Youth Justice: Listening to Young People’s Experiences of Communication within the Youth Justice Sector. Auckland: Point Research Ltd, Tuilaepa Youth Mentoring Service, Talking Trouble Aotearoa NZ.
31.
Ministry of Justice (2010) Alternative pre-trial and trial processes for child witnesses in New Zealand’s criminal justice system: Issues paper. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice (2019b) Qualitative Evaluation of the Sexual Violence Court Pilot. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
34.
New Zealand Law Commission (1996) Preliminary Paper 26: The Evidence of Children and Other Vulnerable Witnesses: A Discussion Paper. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission.
35.
New Zealand Law Commission (2012) Alternative Pre-trial and Trial Processes: Possible Reforms. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission.
36.
New Zealand Law Commission (2018) Issues Paper: Second Review of the Evidence Act 2006. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission.
37.
New Zealand Law Commission (2019) NZLC R142—the second review of the Evidence Act 2006—Te arotake tuarua i te Evidence Act 2006. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission
38.
PlotnikoffJWoolfsonR (2006) The ‘Go Between’: Evaluation of Intermediary Pathfinder Projects. Preston: Lexicon Limited.
39.
PlotnikoffJWoolfsonR (2015) Intermediaries in the Criminal Justice System. Bristol: Policy Press.
40.
PowellMBBowdenPMattisonM (2015) Stakeholders’ perceptions of the benefit of introducing an Australian intermediary system for vulnerable witnesses. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology48(4): 498–512.
41.
ScottK (2009) Under the knife: An analysis of the medical council of New Zealand’s statement on cosmetic procedures. Journal of Law and Medicine16(4): 625–652.
42.
StephensonMI (2017) The development and initial evaluation of an oral language assessment tool for young people caught up in the legal system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
43.
TaggartJ (2018) Defendant intermediaries in the criminal justice system: Is
44.
Northern Ireland leading the way? LSE Law – Policy Briefing Paper No. 30. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3219987.
45.
Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales (2018) A Voice for the Voiceless: The Victims’ Commissioner’s Review into the Provision of Registered Intermediaries for Children and Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses. London: Office of the Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales.
