Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-8
‘It was like more easier’: Rangatahi (Young People) and Their whānau (Family) Talk About Communication Assistance in the New Zealand Youth Justice System
This qualitative study gives voice to rangatahi (young people) and their whānau (families) (n = 10) who have experienced communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. Communication assistance is a form of specialist support for witnesses and defendants who have been identified as having communication difficulties; and is modelled on the role of the intermediary in England and Wales. The findings overall suggest that communication assistance has a valuable and ongoing role to play in the NZ youth justice system, and may be one means of addressing the rights and needs of those with communication difficulties who offend.
AndersonSAHawesDJSnowPC (2016) Language impairments among youth offenders: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review65: 195–203.
2.
BecroftA (2014) Signed, sealed: (But not yet fully) delivered. In: Proceedings of the healing courts, healing plans, healing people: international indigenous therapeutic jurisprudence conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8 October.
3.
BecroftA (2015) It’s all relative: The absolute importance of the family in youth justice (a New Zealand perspective). In: Proceedings of the world congress on juvenile justice, Geneva, 26–30 January.
4.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
5.
BryanK (2004) Preliminary study of the prevalence of speech and language difficulties in young offenders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders39(3): 391–400.
6.
BryanKGarvaniGGregoryJKilnerK (2015) Language difficulties and criminal justice: The need for earlier identification. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders50(6): 763–775.
CooperPMattisonM (2017) Intermediaries, vulnerable people and the quality of evidence: An international comparison of three versions of the English intermediary model. International Journal of Evidence and Proof21(4): 351–370.
9.
CooperPWurtzelD (2013) A day late and a dollar short: In search of an intermediary scheme for vulnerable defendants in England and Wales. Criminal Law Review1: 4–22.
Department of Corrections (2007) Over-Representation of Māori in the Criminal Justice System: An Exploratory Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections.
12.
Department of Justice (Northern Ireland) (2015) Northern Ireland Registered Intermediaries Schemes Pilot Project: Post-Project Review. Belfast: Department of Justice (Northern Ireland).
13.
HenwoodCStratfordS (2014) New Zealand’s Gift to the World: The Youth Justice Family Group Conference. Wellington, New Zealand: The Henwood Trust.
14.
HoukamauCASibleyCG (2010) The multi-dimensional model of Māori identity and cultural engagement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology39(1): 8–28.
15.
HowardKMcCannCDudleyM (2020a) ‘I was flying blind a wee bit’: Professionals’ perspectives on challenges facing communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof24: 104–120.
16.
HowardKMcCannCDudleyM (2020b) What is communication assistance? Describing a new and emerging profession in the New Zealand youth justice system. Psychiatry, Psychology and The Law27(2): 300–314.
17.
HowardKMcCannCDudleyM (2020c) ‘It’s really good, why hasn’t it happened earlier?’ Professionals’ perspectives on the benefits of communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology53(2): 265–284.
18.
HoyanoLRaffertyA (2017) Rationing defence intermediaries under the April 2016 Criminal practice direction. Criminal Law Review2: 93–105.
19.
HughesNWilliamsHChitsabesanPDaviesRMounceL (2012) Nobody Made the Connection: The Prevalence of Neurodisability in Young People Who Offend. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner for England.
20.
HumberESnowPC (2001) The oral language skills of young offenders: A pilot investigation. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law8(1): 1–11.
21.
KilkellyU (2008) Youth courts and children’s rights: The Irish experience. Youth Justice8(1): 39–56.
KingM (2012) The Penguin History of New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Group New Zealand.
24.
Law Commission (England and Wales) (2016) Unfitness to Plead; Volume 1: Report. London: Law Commission (England and Wales).
25.
LawJBoyleJHarrisFHarknessANyeC (2000) Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: Findings from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders/Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists35(2): 165–188.
26.
LawJGarrettZNyeC (2003) Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews3: CD004110.
27.
LountSAHandLPurdySFranceA (2018) Tough talk: Youth offender’s perceptions of communicating in the youth justice system in New Zealand. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology54(1): 593–618.
28.
LountSAPurdySCHandL (2017) Hearing, auditory processing, and language skills of male youth offenders and remandees in youth justice residences in New Zealand. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research60(1): 121–135.
29.
LynchN (2019) Youth Justice in New Zealand, 3rd Edition. Wellington, New Zealand: Thomson Reuters.
MartinS (2019) The role of the speech-language pathologist in supporting young people in youth justice: A Queensland perspective. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology21(1): 6–10.
32.
MetzgerNSavaiiKMcKeeAKedgeS (2018) Youth Voices about Youth Justice: Listening to Young People’s Experiences of Communication within the Youth Justice Sector. Auckland, New Zealand: Point Research Ltd, Tuilaepa Youth Mentoring Service, Talking Trouble Aotearoa NZ.
33.
Ministry of Justice (2011) Youth Court Research: Experiences and Views of Young People, Their Families and Professionals. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
MurphyMGrayCMAchterbergTVWykeSCoxS (2010) The effectiveness of the talking mat framework in helping people with dementia to express their views on well-being. Dementia9(4): 454–472.
36.
ParsonsSSherwoodG (2015) The Widget Symbol Custody Sheet Pilot Project: Final Report. Southampton: University of Southampton. Available at: www.widgit.com
37.
PaulRNorburyC (2012) Language Disorders from Infancy through Adolescence: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing, and Communicating, 4th Edition. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
38.
PlotnikoffJWoolfsonR (2015) Intermediaries in the Criminal Justice System. Bristol: Policy Press.
39.
PlotnikoffJWoolfsonR (2019) Falling Short? A Snapshot of Young Witness Policy and Practice. London: NSPCC.
SeymourMButlerM (2008) Young People on Remand. Dublin: Office of the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs, Department of Health and Children.
44.
SnowPC (2019) Speech-language pathology and the youth offender: Epidemiological overview and roadmap for future speech-language pathology research and scope of practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools50: 324–339.
45.
SnowPCPowellMB (2004) Developmental language disorders and adolescent risk: A public-health advocacy role for speech pathologists?International Journal of Speech-language Pathology6(4): 221–229.
46.
SnowPCPowellMB (2005) What’s the story? An exploration of narrative language abilities in male juvenile offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law11(3): 239–253.
47.
SnowPCPowellMB (2008) Oral language competence, social skills and high-risk boys: What are juvenile offenders trying to tell us?Children & Society22(1): 16–28.
48.
SnowPCPowellMB (2012) Youth (in)justice: Oral language competence in early life and risk for engagement in antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice435: 1–6.
49.
Sohr-PrestonSScaramellaL (2006) Implications of timing of maternal depressive symptoms for early cognitive and language development. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review9(1): 65–83.
TobinJ (Ed) (2019) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. London: Oxford University Press.
53.
TomblinJBHardyJCHeinHA (1991) Predicting poor-communication status in preschool children using risk factors present at birth. Journal of Speech Language, and Hearing Research34(5): 1096–1105.
54.
TurnerKCleggJSpencerS (2019) Speech-language pathology service provision in English youth offending institutions: Findings from a survey. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-language Pathology21(1): 11–16.
55.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2009) General Comment No. 12 (2009): The Right of the Child to Be Heard (CRC/C/GC/12). Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ae562c52.html
WigzellAKirbyAJacobsonJ (2015) The Youth Proceedings Advocacy Review: Final Report. London: Institute for Criminal Policy Research.
58.
WinstanleyMWebbRTConti-RamsdenG (2018) More or less likely to offend? Young adults with a history of identified developmental language disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders53(2): 256–270.
59.
WoodwardMMcLeanESwainNSnowP (2019) What’s the evidence? Speech-language pathology intervention with young people in custody. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology21(1): 29–33.
