This study examined the role of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning (SRL) and English language learning achievements in Hong Kong primary school students. A sample of 690 4th graders participated in the study. The findings suggest that the level of SRL strategy use (i.e. monitoring, effort regulation, and goal setting and planning) was driven by the students’ motivational beliefs (i.e. growth mindset, self-efficacy, and intrinsic value) in different ways. Monitoring and effort regulation, in turn, were significant contributors to the participants’ English language learning achievements, but goal setting and planning did not predict their English language learning achievements. The finding suggests that growth mindset was a stronger predictor of SRL than self-efficacy and intrinsic value. Implications for fostering adaptive motivational beliefs and SRL are discussed. Future research should consider the influence of the socio-cultural context on the relationships between motivational factors, SRL strategy use, and English language learning achievements.
BaiB. (2018). Understanding primary school students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies through think-aloud protocols. System, 78, 15–26.
2.
BaiB.ChaoC.N.G.WangC. (2019). The relationship between social support, self-efficacy and English language learning achievement in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 208–221.
3.
BaiB.GuoW. (2019). Motivation and self-regulated strategy use: Relationships to primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research. Epub ahead of print 4July2019. DOI: 10.1177/1362168819859921.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
5.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
6.
BlackwellL.S.TrzesniewskiK.H.DweckC.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
7.
BoltonK.GraddolD. (2012). English in contemporary China. English Today, 28, 3–9.
8.
BonneyC.R.CortinaK.S.Smith-DardenJ.P.FioriK.L. (2008). Understanding strategies in foreign language learning: Are integrative and intrinsic motives distinct predictors?Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 1–10.
9.
BurnetteJ.L.O’BoyleE.H.VanEppsE.M.PollackJ.M.FinkelE.J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.
10.
ByrneB.M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
ClaroS.PauneskuD.DweckC.S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 8664–8668.
12.
Curriculum Development Council. (2017). English language education: Key learning area curriculum guide (primary 1 – secondary 6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
13.
DeciE.L.RyanR.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
14.
DurikA.M.VidaM.EcclesJ.S. (2005). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393.
15.
DweckC.S. (2006). Mindset : the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
EcclesJ.S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 109–132.
18.
EvansS. (2017). English in Hong Kong higher education. World Englishes, 36, 591–610.
19.
FraineB.D.DammeJ.V.OnghenaP. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 132–150.
20.
FredricksJ.A.BlumenfeldP.C.ParisA.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
21.
HauK.T.HoI.T. (2010). Chinese students’ motivation and achievement. In BondM.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 187–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HorwitzE.K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557–576.
23.
HsiehP.-H.P.SchallertD.L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 513–532.
24.
JansenM.SchererR.SchroedersU. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24.
25.
KimD.-H.WangC.AhnH.S.BongM. (2015). English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136–142.
26.
KormosJ.CsizérK. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 275–299.
27.
LeungJ.T.ShekD.T. (2015). Parental attributions of children’s success and failure and family processes in poor Chinese families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 2191–2203.
28.
LiD. C. S. (2018). Two decades of decolonization and renationalization: The evolutionary dynamics of Hong Kong English and an update of its functions and status’. Asian Englishes, 20, 2–14.
29.
LiemA.D.LauS.NieY. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
30.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33.
31.
LouN.M.NoelsK.A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets. System, 86, 1–12.
32.
McEownM.S.NoelsK.A.SaumureK.D. (2014). Students’ self-determined and integrative orientations and teachers’ motivational support in a Japanese as a foreign language context. System, 45, 227–241.
33.
MegaC.RonconiL.De BeniR. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121–131.
34.
MEXT. (2008). Shogakkou gakushuu shidou youryou kaisetu: Gaikokugo katsudouhen [Explanatory commentary for the elementary school curriculum guidelines: Foreign language activities]. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
35.
MuñozC. (2017). Tracing trajectories of young learners: Ten years of school English learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 168–184.
36.
NisbetD.L.TindallE.R.ArroyoA.A. (2005). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 100–107.
37.
NoelsK.A.Vargas LascanoD.I.SaumureK. (2019). The development of self-determination across the language course. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 821–851.
38.
Oga-BaldwinW.L.Q.NakataY.ParkerP.RyanR.M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140–150.
39.
OxfordR.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
40.
OxfordR.L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7, 28–47.
41.
OxfordR.L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow / New York: Pearson/Longman.
42.
OxfordR.L.Burry-StockJ.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 1–23.
43.
PajaresF. (2006). Self-efficacy during childhood and adolescence: Implications for teachers and parents. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents: Volume 5 (pp. 339–367). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
44.
PintrichP.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.
45.
PintrichP.R.De GrootE.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
46.
PintrichP.R.SmithD.A.F.GarcíaT.McKeachieW.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
47.
PintrichP.R.ZushoA. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In EcclesA.W.S. (Ed.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48.
RaoN.ChanC.K. (2010). Moving beyond paradoxes: Understanding Chinese learners and their teachers. In ChanC.K.RaoN. (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Volume 25 (pp. 3–32). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
49.
RigdonE.E. (1995). A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 359–383.
50.
ShihY.-C.ReynoldsB.L. (2018). The effects of integrating goal setting and reading strategy instruction on English reading proficiency and learning motivation: A quasi-experimental study. Applied Linguistics Review, 9, 35–62.
51.
TrillingB. (2009). 21st century skills : Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.
TsangW.-K. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance. Applied Linguistics, 17, 210–233.
53.
TsuiA.B.TollefsonJ.W. (2017). Language policy and the construction of national cultural identity. In TsuiA.TollefsonJ. (Eds.), Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 1–24). New York: Routledge.
54.
TweedR.G.LehmanD.R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89–99.
55.
WallerL.PapiM. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65.
56.
WangC.BaiB. (2017). Validating the instruments to measure ESL/EFL learners’ self-Efficacy beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 931–947.
57.
WangJ.RaoN. (2019). Classroom goal structures: Observations from urban and rural high school classes in China. Psychology in the Schools, 56, 1211–1229.
58.
WestS.G.FinchJ.F.CurranP.J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR.H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
WigfieldA.CambriaJ. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1–35.
60.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ.S.FredricksJ.A., et al. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In LernerR. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 657–700). 7th edition.New York: Wiley.
61.
XiaoY.YangM. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49.
62.
YeagerD.S.RomeroC.PauneskuD., et al. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374–391.
63.
YeungA.S.LauS.NieY. (2011). Primary and secondary students’ motivation in learning English: Grade and gender differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 246–256.
64.
ZimmermanB.J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17.
65.
ZimmermanB.J.PonsM.M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.
66.
ZimmermanB.J.SchunkD.H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
