Conscientiousness and sense of purpose consistently predict health, wellbeing, and health behavior. However, it remains an open question whether they are unique or overlapping predictors of health and wellbeing. The current study considered this question using the MOSAiCH study, a nationally representative sample of 2305 Swiss adults (M: 52.33 years old; SD = 17.36). Participants reported on sense of purpose and conscientiousness, in addition to multiple health, wellbeing, and health behavior indicators (e.g. dietary practices, activity engagement, health conditions, psychological concerns, and doctor visits). Results found conscientiousness and sense of purpose were moderately associated with multiple health, wellbeing, and health behavior indicators. Bifactor modeling was employed to test the incremental validity of conscientiousness and sense of purpose, when accounting for their shared variance. The specific factor for purpose predicted outcomes even when accounting for conscientiousness. However, conscientiousness had little incremental validity over the general factor.
AllemandMFlückigerC (2017) Changing personality traits: Some considerations from psychotherapy process-outcome research for intervention efforts on intentional personality change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration27(4): 476–494.
2.
AnglimJHorwoodSSmillieLD, et al. (2020) Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin146(4): 279–323.
3.
BoggTRobertsBW (2004) Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin130(6): 887–919.
4.
BoggTRobertsBW (2013) The case for conscientiousness: Evidence and implications for a personality trait marker of health and longevity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine45(3): 278–288.
5.
BronkKCHillPLLapsleyDK, et al. (2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology4(6): 500–510.
6.
BurrowALHillPLSumnerR (2016) Leveling mountains: Purpose attenuates links between perceptions of effort and steepness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(1): 94–103.
7.
ChopikWLeeJH (2022) Dyadic associations between conscientiousness facets, health, and health behavior over time. Collabra8(1): 37611.
8.
CohenRBavishiCRozanskiA (2016) Purpose in life and its relationship to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine78(2): 122–133.
9.
EidMGeiserCKochT, et al. (2017) Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods22: 541–562.
10.
GartlandNWilsonALawtonR, et al. (2021) Conscientiousness and engagement with national health behaviour guidelines. Psychology Health & Medicine26(4): 421–432.
11.
GoodwinRDFriedmanHS (2006) Health status and the five-factor personality traits in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Health Psychology11(5): 643–654.
12.
Hagger-JohnsonGSabiaSNabiH, et al. (2012) Low conscientiousness and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality over 17 years: Whitehall II cohort study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research73(2): 98–103.
13.
HampsonSE (2012) Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin. Annual Review of Psychology63: 315–339.
14.
HillPLBeckEDJacksonJJ (2021) Maintaining sense of purpose following health adversity in older adulthood: A propensity score matching examination. Journals of Gerontology Series B76: 1574–1579.
15.
HillPLPfundGN (2021) Purposeful living as an essential ingredient to a healthy life. In: SiroisFM (ed.) Palgrave Handbook of Positive Psychology and Health. Springer Nature.
16.
HillPLWestonSJ (2019) Evaluating eight-year trajectories for sense of purpose in the health and retirement study. Aging & Mental Health23(2): 233–237.
17.
HookerSAMastersKS (2016) Purpose in life is associated with physical activity measured by accelerometer. Journal of Health Psychology21(6): 962–971.
18.
IdlerELBenyaminiY (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior38: 21–37.
19.
JokelaMElovainioMNybergST, et al. (2014a) Personality and risk of diabetes in adults: Pooled analysis of 5 cohort studies. Health Psychology33(12): 1618–1621.
20.
JokelaMPulkki-RåbackLElovainioM, et al. (2014b) Personality traits as risk factors for stroke and coronary heart disease mortality: Pooled analysis of three cohort studies. Journal of Behavioral Medicine37(5): 881–889.
21.
KernMLFriedmanHS (2008) Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology27(5): 505–512.
22.
KimESKawachiIChenY, et al. (2017) Association between purpose in life and objective measures of physical function in older adults. JAMA Psychiatry74(10): 1039–1045.
23.
KimESShibaKBoehmJK, et al. (2020) Sense of purpose in life and five health behaviors in older adults. Preventive Medicine139: 106172.
24.
LewisNA (2020) Purpose in life as a guiding framework for goal engagement and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass14(10): 1–11.
25.
MatthewsKAAdlerNEForrestCB, et al. (2016) Collecting psychosocial “vital signs” in electronic health records: Why now? What are they? What’s new for psychology?American Psychologist71(6): 497–504.
26.
McKnightPEKashdanTB (2009) Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology13(3): 242–251.
27.
O'ConnorDBConnerMJonesF, et al. (2009) Exploring the benefits of conscientiousness: An investigation of the role of daily stressors and health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine37(2): 184–196.
OlaruGDannerD (2021) Developing cross-cultural short scales using ant colony optimization. Assessment28(1): 199–210.
30.
PfundGN (2020) We meet again: The reintroduction and reintegration of purpose into personality psychology. In: BurrowALHillPL (eds) The Ecology of Purposeful Living Across the Lifespan. Cham: Springer, pp.11–28.
31.
PfundGNHoferMAllemandM, et al. (2022) Being social may be purposeful in older adulthood: A measurement burst design. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry30(7): 777–786.
32.
RevelleW (2022) Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
33.
RobertsBWChernyshenkoOSStarkS, et al. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology58(1): 103–139.
34.
RobertsBWKuncelNRShinerR, et al. (2007) The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science2(4): 313–345.
35.
RobertsBWLejuezCKruegerRF, et al. (2014) What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed?Developmental Psychology50(5): 1315–1330.
36.
RosseelY (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48(2): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
37.
RyffCD (1989) Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development12(1): 35–55.
38.
ScheierMFWroschCBaumA, et al. (2006) The life engagement test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine29(3): 291–298.
39.
SmithTWMacKenzieJ (2006) Personality and risk of physical illness. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology2: 435–467.
40.
SotoCJJohnOP (2017) Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality68: 69–81.
41.
StähliMSapinMPollienA, et al. (2022) MOSAiCH 2021. Measurement and Observation of Social Attitudes in Switzerland. Study on Health and Health Care and related topics [Dataset]. FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences. Distributed by SWISSUbase, Lausanne, 2022.
42.
WareJJrKosinskiMKellerSD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care34: 220–233.
43.
WillrothECMroczekDKHillPL (2021) Maintaining sense of purpose in midlife predicts better physical health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research145: 110485.
44.
WysockiACLawsonKMRhemtullaM (2022) Statistical control requires causal justification. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science5(2): 25152459221095823.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
