The objective of this study was to develop the Pro-Change Functional Well-Being Scale, a measure that provides an informative evaluation of general functioning loss due to well-being-related barriers. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses on data from 642 individuals supported a one-factor solution with good model fit. A strong positive correlation existed between the Pro-Change Functional Well-Being Scale and Well-Being Assessment for Productivity. Initial construct validity was demonstrated by predictable relationships between functioning loss and other measures of health and well-being. This initial psychometric evidence suggests that the Pro-Change Functional Well-Being Scale is a reliable and valid assessment of functioning loss due to common well-being-related barriers.
AdamsenLQuistMMidtgaardJ. (2006) The effect of a multidimensional exercise intervention on physical capacity, well-being and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer14(2): 116–127.
2.
AllenTDHerstDELBruckCS. (2000) Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology5: 278–308.
3.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84: 191–215.
4.
CamfieldLSkevingtonSM (2008) On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology13(6): 764–775.
5.
CantrilH (1965) The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
ChidaYSteptoeA (2008) Positive psychological well-being and mortality: A quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine70(7): 741–756.
7.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavior Sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CollinsJJBaaseCMShardaCE. (2005) The assessment of chronic health conditions on work performance, absence, and total economic impact for employers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine47(6): 547–557.
9.
EversKEProchaskaJOCastlePH. (2012) Development of an individual well-being scores assessment. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice2: 2.
10.
Gaitan-SierraCHylandME (2013) Mood enhancement in health-promoting non-aerobic exercise: The role of non-specific mechanisms. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/1359105313482163.
GoetzelROzminkowskiRSedererL. (2002) The business case for quality mental health services: Why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine44: 320–330.
13.
HemingwayHNicholsonAStaffordM. (1997) The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: The Whitehall II Study. American Journal of Public Health87(9): 1484–1490.
14.
HopmanWMTowheedTAnastassiadesT. (2000) Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal163(3): 265–271.
15.
HornJI (1965) A rationale and test for the test of number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika30: 179–185.
16.
JacksonDN (1970) A sequential system for personality scale development. In: SpielbergerCD (ed.) Current Topics in Clinical and Community Psychology, vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, pp. 61–96.
17.
KesslerRCBarberCBeckA. (2003) The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine45: 156–173.
18.
McKee-RyanFSongZWanbergCR. (2005) Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology90(1): 53–76.
19.
ObidoaCAReisineSLCherniackM (2010) How does the SF-36 perform in health populations? A structured review of longitudinal studies. Journal of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences4(1): 30–48.
20.
PenedoFJDahnJR (2005) Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry18(2): 189–193.
21.
ProchaskaJOButterworthSReddingCA. (2008) Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI’s with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Preventive Medicine46(3): 226–231.
22.
ProchaskaJOEversKEJohnsonJL. (2011) The well-being assessment for productivity: a well-being approach to presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine53(7): 735–742.
23.
ReillyMCZbrozekASDukesEM (1993) The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics4: 353–365.
24.
RuthigJCAlleryA (2008) Native American elders’ health congruence: The role of gender and corresponding functional well-being, hospital admissions, and social engagement. Journal of Health Psychology13(8): 1072–1081.
25.
Salvador-CarullaLGascaVI (2010) Defining disability, functioning, autonomy and dependency in person-centered medicine and integrative care. International Journal of Integrated Care10: 69–72.
26.
SchmidtCKRaque-BogdanTLPiontkowskiS. (2011) Putting the positive in health psychology: A content analysis of three journals. Journal of Health Psychology16(4): 607–620.
27.
SchwartzSMRiedelJ (2010) Productivity and health: Best practices for better measures of productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine52: 865–871.
28.
ShmotkinD (1990) Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research23(3): 201–230.
29.
SpectorPEJexSM (1998) Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology3: 356–367.
30.
VelicerWF (1976) Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika41: 321–327.
31.
VelicerWFEatonCAFavaJL (2000) Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: GoffinRDHelmesE (eds) Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment: Honoring Douglas Jackson at Seventy. Boston, MA: Kluwer, pp. 41–71.
32.
VelikovaGBoothLSmithAB. (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology22(4): 714–724.
33.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) Constitution of the World Health Organization: Basic Documents (45th edn). Geneva: World Health Organization.
34.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ (accessed 12 March 2012).
35.
WrightFBoyleSBaxterK. (2013) Understanding the relationship between weight loss, emotional well-being and health-related quality of life in patients attending a specialist obesity weight management service. Journal of Health Psychology18(4): 574–586.
