Tele-assessment of trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: Intra- and inter-rater reliability,and validity of the trunk control measurement scale

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) for tele-assessment in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 36 children aged 4–18 years, diagnosed with hemiplegic CP. Participants underwent four TCMS assessments: in-person assessment, tele-assessment via videoconferencing, and two video-based tele-assessments scored by same rater and by a second rater. Reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing TCMS tele-assessment scores between children with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I and II, while criterion validity was evaluated by examining the correlation between face-to-face and tele-assessment TCMS scores.

Results

Excellent reliability was observed between face-to-face and tele-assessment (ICC: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.83–0.95). TCMS tele-assessment also demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80–0.94) and high inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66–0.90). Criterion validity was confirmed by strong correlations between face-to-face and tele-assessment scores (r = 0.925, and r = 0.892, p < 0.001 for rater-1 and rater-2, respectively). The TCMS successfully discriminated children by functional levels, demonstrating discriminative validity (p = 0.002). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal systematic error, with internal consistency remaining high across all assessments (>0.88).

Discussion

TCMS is a valid and reliable tool for teleassessing trunk control in children with hemiplegic CP. These results may pave the way for developing child-specific, targeted telerehabilitation programs, bringing telerehabilitation closer to its primary aim of ensuring equal opportunities.

This study was registered as a clinical trial (NCT06707831). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06707831

Keywords

Tele-assessment telehealth‌remote assessment telerehabilitation cerebral palsy trunk control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zheng

Hou

Liu

, et al. Knowledge structure and emerging trends of telerehabilitation in recent 20 years: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 904855.

Suso-Martí

La Touche

Herranz-Gómez

, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice: An umbrella and mapping review with meta–meta-analysis. Phys Ther 2021; 101: pzab075.

Gallegos-Rejas

Thomas

Kelly

, et al. A multi-stakeholder approach is needed to reduce the digital divide and encourage equitable access to telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29: 73–78.

Rosenbaum

Paneth

Leviton

, et al. A report: The definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007; 109: 8–14.

Yang

Liu

, et al.

Corona virus disease 2019, a growing threat to children?

J Infect 2020; 80: 671.

Snoswell

Chelberg

De Guzman

, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29: 669–684.

Tamboosi

Al-Khathami

El-Shamy

. The effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation on improvement of daily living activities in children with cerebral palsy: Narrative review. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy 2021; 26: 1–12.

Ünes

. The role of teleassessment in family-centered approaches for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2025; 67: 148–149.

Sadowska

Sarecka-Hujar

Kopyta

. Cerebral palsy: Current opinions on definition, epidemiology, risk factors, classification and treatment options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2020; 16: 1505–1518.

10.

Kallem Seyyar

Aras

. Trunk control and functionality in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil 2019; 22: 120–125.

11.

Yan

Park

Keefer

, et al. Improving trunk postural control facilitates walking in children with cerebral palsy: A pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 102: 795–802.

12.

Heyrman

Molenaers

Desloovere

, et al. A clinical tool to measure trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: The trunk control measurement scale. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32: 2624–2635.

13.

Mokkink

Boers

Van Der Vleuten

, et al. COSMIN Risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: A Delphi study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20: 1–13.

14.

Cans

Dolk

Platt

, et al. Recommendations from the SCPE collaborative group for defining and classifying cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 35.

15.

Palisano

Rosenbaum

Bartlett

, et al. Content validity of the expanded and revised gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 744–750.

16.

Eliasson

A-C

Krumlinde-Sundholm

Rösblad

, et al. The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 549–554.

17.

Hidecker

MJC

Paneth

Rosenbaum

, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2011; 53: 704–710.

18.

Baranello

Signorini

Tinelli

, et al. Visual function classification system for children with cerebral palsy: Development and validation. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020; 62: 104–110.

19.

Ozal

Ari

Gunel

. Inter–intra observer reliability and validity of the Turkish version of trunk control measurement scale in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019; 53: 381–384.

20.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

21.

Bland

Altman

. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

22.

McHugh

. Standard error: Meaning and interpretation. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2008; 18: 7–13.

23.

López-Ruiz

Estrada-Barranco

Martín-Gómez

, et al. Trunk control measurement scale (TCMS): Psychometric properties of cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20: 5144.

24.

Heo

Shin

. Reliability analysis of the Korean version of the trunk control measurement scale in cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci 2018; 30: 1–4.