This article proposes a theoretical framework and a grid to unify models and to describe programme evaluation. It identifies three components in the evaluation process: the information-collecting process; the value-judgement product; and the use of the latter in decision making. It defines three differentiation axes (or dimensions): the social enunciation, the external or internal position of actors, and the formal or informal character of the evaluation components. The relevance for the practitioner and the researcher is discussed and briefly illustrated with two examples from the health promotion sector: a project selection process and a retrospective study of programme-evaluation practices.
Alkin, M.C. and F.S. Ellett (1979) `An Inquiry into the Nature of Evaluation Theorizing' , Studies in Educational Evaluation5(2): 151-6.
2.
Alkin, M.C. and F.S. Ellett (1990) `Development of Evaluation Models', in H. J. Walberg and G. D. Haertel (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation , pp. 15-21. London: Pergamon Press.
3.
Barbier, J.M. (1990) L'évaluation en Formation. Paris: PUF.
4.
Cousins, J.B. and K.A. Leithwood (1986) `Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization' , Review of Educational Research56(3): 331-64.
5.
Crozier, M. and E. Friedberg (1977) L'acteur et le système. Paris : Seuil.
6.
Demarteau, M. (1994) `Le conseil en évaluation: une fonction professionnelle à développer pour une évolution des pratiques de promotion de la santé', Paper presented at the `Troisièmes Rencontres Francophones Internationales de Promotion de la Santé'. Lille, 27-30 June.
7.
Demarteau, M. (1998) Analyse des pratiques d'évaluation de programmes d'éducation pour la santé, (Thesis in Public Health)University of Liège.
8.
Demarteau, M. and M. Thiess (2000) `Professional Empowerment and Evaluation Practices in Health Promotion', Paper presented at the 3rd Nordic Health Promotion Research Conference `Outcomes in Health Promotion' . September 6-9, Tampere, Finland.
9.
Guba, E.G. and Y.S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. London: Sage.
House, E. R. (ed.) (1986) New Directions in Educational Evaluation. London: Falmer Press.
12.
Lafontaine, C., C. Vandoorne and M. Demarteau (2001) `Issues at Stake and Requirements of a Quality Improvement of Expert Evaluation', Paper presented at the XVIIth World IUHPE Conference, 15-20 July, Paris , France.
13.
Marsch, D.D., W.B. Newman and W.F. Bover (1981) Comparing Ideal and Real. A Study of Evaluation Practice in California Using the Joint Committee's Evaluation Standards. Los Angeles, CA: AERA.
14.
Monnier, E. (1987) Evaluations de l'action des pouvoirs publics: du projet au bilan. Paris: Economica .
15.
Nevo, D. (1986) `The Conceptualization of Educational Evaluation: an Analytical Review of the Literature', in E. R. House (ed.) New Directions in Educational Evaluation , pp. 15-29. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
16.
Patton, M. (1978) Utilisation-focused Evaluation. London: Sage.
17.
Scheerens, J. (1990) `Beyond Decision-oriented Evaluation', in H. J. Walberg and G. D. Haertel (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation, pp. 35-40. London: Pergamon Press.
18.
Scrivens, E. (1997) `Assessing the Value of Accreditation Systems' , European Journal of Public Health7(1): 4-8.
19.
Shadish, W.R. and R. Epstein (1987) `Patterns of Program Evaluation Practice among Members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network', Evaluation Review11: 555-90.
20.
Stufflebeam, D.L. and A.J. Shinkfield (1985) Systematic Evaluation: A Self-instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
21.
Stufflebeam, D.L. and W.J. Webster (1980) `An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation' , Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis2(3): 5-20.
22.
Vial, M.P. (1987) `Evaluer n'est pas mesurer', Cahiers Pédagogiques16-17.
23.
Williams, J.E. (1989) `A Numerically Developed Taxonomy of Evaluation Theory and Practice', Evaluation Review13(1): 18-31.
24.
Worthen, B.R. (1990) `Program Evaluation', in H. J. Walberg and G. D. Haertel (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation, pp. 42-7. London: Pergamon Press.
