Despite the potential advantages of a closer link between planning evaluation and programme evaluation , both fields have been developed independently. This is mainly due to significant differences between them, particularly in terms of historical background, evaluation scope and contexts, the articulation between theory and practice, and the timings of evaluation. This article advocates bridging the gap between these two fields, and presents the Plan-Process-Results (PPR) methodology as an example of, and a contribution to, this bridging process. PPR is a methodology for evaluating planning and plan implementation, integrating elements from three types of planning evaluation, based on rationality ex-ante, performance and conformance.
Alexander E. ( 2000) Rationality revisited: planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective, Journal of Planning Education and Research19(3): 242-56.
2.
Alexander E. ( 2006) Evolution and status: where is planning evaluation today and how did it get here? In: Alexander E. (ed.) Evaluation and Planning, Evolution and Prospects . Aldershot: Ashgate, 3-16.
3.
Alexander E. and Faludi A. ( 1989) Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design16: 127-40.
4.
Borri D, Khakee A and Lacirignola C (eds) (1997) Evaluating Theory-Practice and Urban-Rural Interplay in Planning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5.
CLG (Communities and Local Government) (2008 ) Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Spatial Planning, London: TSO.
6.
EC (European Commission) (1999) MEANS Collection - Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes. Luxembourg: Official Publications Office of the European Communities.
7.
Faludi A. ( 2000) The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research15(4): 299-318.
8.
Faludi A. ( 2006) Evaluating plans: the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective. In: Alexander E (ed.) Evaluation and Planning, Evolution and Prospects. Aldershot : Ashgate, 119-43.
9.
Guba EG and Lincoln YS ( 1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
Healey P. ( 1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy foundation. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design23(2): 217-34.
11.
Hill M. ( 1968) A goals achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans. Journal of the American Institute of Planners34: 19-29.
12.
Ho Y. ( 2003) Evaluating British Urban Policy - Ideology, Conflict and Compromise, Aldershot: Ashgate.
13.
Innes J. ( 1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research14(3): 183-90.
14.
Khakee A. ( 1998) Evaluation and planning: inseparable concepts. Town Planning Review69(4): 359-74.
15.
Khakee A. ( 2003) The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice . Evaluation9(3): 340-52.
16.
Khakee A, Hull A, Miller D and Woltjer J (eds) (2008) New Principles in Planning Evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17.
Knapp P. ( 2004) Theory-based evaluation and learning: possibilities and changes. Evaluation10(1): 16-34.
18.
Laurian L., Crawford J., Day M., Kouwenhoven P., Mason G., Ericksen N and Beattie L (2010) Evaluating the outcomes of plans: theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design37: 740-57.
19.
Lichfield N. ( 1956) Economics of Planned Development. London: Estates Gazette.
20.
Lichfield N. ( 1996) Community Impact Evaluation. London : UCL Press.
21.
Lichfield N. ( 1998) Trends in planning evaluation: a British perspective. In: Lichfield N, Barbanente A, Borri D, Khakee A and Prat A (eds) (1998) Evaluation in Planning: Facing the Challenge of Complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1-15.
22.
Lichfield N. ( 2000) Where do we go from here? Evaluation6(3): 351-59.
23.
Lichfield N. ( 2001) The philosophy and role of Community Impact Evaluation in the planning system. In: Voogd H (ed.) Recent Developments in Evaluation. Groningen: Geopress, 153-73.
24.
Lichfield N. and Prat A. ( 1998) Linking ex-ante and ex-post evaluation in British town planning. In: Lichfield N, Barbanente A, Borri D , Khakee A and Prat A (eds) (1998) Evaluation in Planning: Facing the Challenge of Complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 283-98.
25.
Lichfield N, Barbanente A , Borri D, Khakee A and Prat A (eds) (1998) Evaluation in Planning: Facing the Challenge of Complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26.
Lichfield N., Kettle P. and Whitbread M. ( 1975) Evaluation in the Planning Process. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
27.
Miller D and Patassini D (eds) (2005) Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28.
Oliveira V. ( 2007) Avaliação em planeamento urbano. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Porto.
29.
Oliveira V. and Pinho P. ( 2009) Evaluating plans, processes and results. Planning Theory & Practice10(1): 35-63.
30.
Oliveira V. and Pinho P.(2010a) Evaluation in urban planning: advances and prospects. Journal of Planning Literature24(4): 343-61.
31.
Oliveira V. and Pinho P.(2010b) Measuring success in planning. Developing and testing a methodology for planning evaluation. Town Planning Review81(3): 307-32.
32.
Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. and Voogd H. ( 1990) Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
33.
PAS (Planning Advisory Service) (2010) Sustainability Appraisal. Advice Note. URL (consulted May 2011): http://www.pas.gov.uk/pas/core/page.do?pageId=225072#contents-2 .
34.
Patton M. ( 2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
Rossi PH, Freeman H. and Lipsey MW ( 1999) Evaluation, a Systematic Approach, 6th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
36.
Seasons M. ( 2003) Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning. Journal of the American Planning Association69: 430-40.
37.
Vedung E.(2010) Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation16(3): 263-77.
38.
Voogd H. ( 1997) The changing role of evaluation methods in a changing planning environment: some Dutch experiences. European Planning Studies5: 257-66.
39.
Voogd H (ed.) (2001) Recent Developments in Evaluation. Groningen: Geopress.
40.
Weiss C. ( 1999) The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation5(4): 468-86.
