Human service fields, and more specifically public health, are increasingly requiring evaluations to prove the worth of funded programs. Many public health practitioners, however, lack the required background and skills to conduct useful, appropriate evaluations. In the late 1990s, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) created the Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health to provide guidance and promote use of evaluation standards by public health professionals. The emphasis of the Framework is utilization-focused evaluation for program improvement or to assess program impact. This article presents the use of the CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health to create and teach practical evaluation methods to master’s of public health students. The article includes the teaching approach, semester-long syllabus for students, and course evaluation data; suggests supplementary materials; and discusses implementation issues.
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, C. A. (2002). The use of role-play in teaching evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 209-218.
2.
Altschuld, J. W., & Thomas, P. M. (1991). The teaching of evaluation: 25 years of growth and change. Theory Into Practice, 30(1), 22-29.
3.
(New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 19-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC). (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(RR-11), 1-40.
5.
Darabi, A. (2002). Teaching program evaluation: Using a systems approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 219-228.
6.
Finkelstein, E. A., Wittenborn, J. S., & Farris, R. P. (2004). Evaluation of public health demonstration programs: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WISEWOMAN. Journal of Women’s Health, 13(5), 625-633.
7.
Gredler, M. E., & Johnson, R. L. (2001). Lessons learned from the directed evaluation experience. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 97-104.
8.
Joint Committee on Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
10.
Leviton, L. C., Collins, C. B., Laird, B. L., & Kratt, P. P. (1998). Teaching evaluation using evaluability assessment. Evaluation, 4(4), 389-409.
11.
Linnan, L., & Steckler, A. (2002). Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: An overview. In A. Steckler & L. Linnan (Eds.), Process evaluation for public health interventions and research (pp. 1-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Logan, S., Boutotte, J., Wilce, M., & Etkind, S. (2003). Using the CDC Framework for program evaluation in public health to assess tuberculosis contact investigation programs. International Journal of Tuberculosis Lung Disease, 7(12), S375-S383.
13.
McConney, A., Rudd, A., & Ayers, R. (2002). Getting to the bottom line: A method for synthesizing findings within mixed-method program evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 121-140.
14.
Milstein, B., Wetterhall, S., & the CDC Evaluation Working Group. (2000). A Framework featuring steps and standards for program evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 1(3), 221-228.
15.
Morris, M. (1992). Field experiences in evaluation courses. Evaluation and Program Planning, 15, 61-66.
16.
National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. (2002). Responsibilities and competencies. Retrieved from http://www.nchec.org/aboutnchec/rc.htm
17.
North Carolina Center for Public Health Preparedness. (2004). A report on the public health workforce in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Printing.
18.
Patton, M. Q. (1997) Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Reininger, B., Vincent, M., Griffin, S. F., Valois, R. F., Taylor, D., Parra-Medina, D., et al. (2003). Evaluation of statewide teen pregnancy prevention initiatives: Challenges, methods and lessons learned. Health Promotion Practice, 4(3), 323-335.
20.
Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Taut, S., & Alkin, M. (2003). Program staff perceptions of barriers to evaluation implementation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 213-226.
22.
Torres, R. T., Preskill, H. S., & Piontek, M. E. (2005). Evaluation strategies for communicating and reporting: Enhancing learning in organizations (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Trevisan, M. S. (2002). Enhancing practical evaluation training through long-term evaluation projects. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(1), 81-92.
24.
Trevisan, M. S. (2004). Practical training in evaluation: A review of the literature. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(2), 255-272.
25.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (USDHHS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. (2005). Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
26.
Wholey, J. S. (1994). Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 40-68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Willer, B. S., Bartlett, D. P., & Northman, J. E. (1978). Simulation as a method for teaching program evaluation. Education and Program Planning, 1, 221-228.
28.
Windsor, R., Baranowki, T., Clark, N., & Cutter, G. (1994). Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
