This article examines findings from a 4-year study conducted in Spain on the labour dynamics within platforms, with workers in food delivery, transportation, cleaning, caregiving, and accommodation. Despite the differences, it explores how informal learning processes enable workers to navigate the platform economy within these services. The study analyses key competences related to technology use, content creation, resource management, service delivery, social management, and understanding platform and legal frameworks through an ethnographic method. The findings reveal a complex constellation of skills and forms of knowledge embedded in platform work that extend beyond digital and algorithmic competences. These results challenge the persistent ‘low-skill’ label commonly associated with location-based gig work and call for broader analytical frameworks to conceptualise and investigate ‘platform work literacies’.
AlbertiGBessaIHardyK, et al. (2018) In, against and beyond precarity: work in insecure times. Work, Employment & Society32(3): 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018762088
2.
Álvarez HernándezGPérez ZapataÓ (2021) Plataformización y gestión “platafórmica”: una discusión de las condiciones de trabajo en una plataforma cualificada. Revista Española de Sociología30(3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.67
3.
Anjali AnwarIPalJHuiJ (2021) Watched, but moving: platformization of beauty work and its gendered mechanisms of control. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4(CSCW3): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432949
4.
AshkrofPde Almeida CorreiaGHCatsO, et al. (2020) Understanding ride-sourcing drivers’ behaviour and preferences: insights from focus groups analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management37: 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100516
5.
BoniniTTreréE (2024) Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight Against Platform Power. MIT Press.
6.
BraunVClarke (2012) Thematic analysis. In: CooperHCamicPMLongDL, et al. (eds) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. American Psychological Association, Vol. 2, pp. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
CameronLD (2024) The making of the “Good Bad” Job: how algorithmic management manufactures consent through constant and confined choices. Administrative Science Quarterly69(2): 458–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241236163
9.
CasilliAPosadaJ (2019) The platformization of labor and society. In: GrahamMDuttonWH (eds) Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing our Lives. Oxford University Press, pp. 293–306.
ChanNK (2022) Algorithmic precarity and metric power: managing the affective measures and customers in the gig economy. Big Data & Society9(2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221133779
12.
ChandlerD (2007) Semiotics. the Basics. 2nd edition. Routledge.
13.
CorbelCNewmanTFarrellL (2022) Gig expectations: literacy practices, events, and texts in the gig economy. Written Communication39(1): 66–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211052941
14.
CropanzanoRKeplingerKLambertBK, et al. (2023) The organizational psychology of gig work: an integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology108(3): 492–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001029
15.
DaudSNMOsmanZSamsudinS, et al. (2024) Adapting to the gig economy: determinants of financial resilience among “Giggers”. Economic Analysis and Policy81: 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.01.002
16.
DeSV (2016) The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-Demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal37(3): 471–504. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
17.
DedemaMRosenbaumH (2024) Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: a systematic literature review: an Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology75(3): 344–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24868
18.
DeVitoMA (2021) Adaptive folk theorization as a path to algorithmic literacy on changing platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5(CSCW2): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476080
19.
DogruelL (2021) What is algorithm literacy? A conceptualization and challenges regarding its empirical measurement. In: TaddickenMSchumannC (eds) Algorithms and Communication, pp. 67–93. https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v9.3
20.
EttarfiK (2024) Professionalization from above in domestic work: accessing work on marketplace platforms. Critical Sociology1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241297687
FiersF (2024) Resilience in the gig economy: digital skills in online freelancing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication29(5): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae014
23.
FlorosK (2024) Rethinking algorithmic management in minor key: the case of housecleaning platform labour in Denmark. Platforms & Society1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624241273468
24.
GallagherCGregoryKKarabalievB (2023) Digital worker inquiry and the critical potential of participatory worker data science for on‐demand platform workers. New Technology, Work and Employment40(1): 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12286
García CalvoAKenneyMZysmanJ (2023) Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives. Industrial and Corporate Change32(4): 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtad005
27.
García-RuizRRamírez-GarcíaARodríguez-RosellMM (2014) Media literacy education for a new prosumer citizenship. Comunicar22(43): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-01
28.
GlotfelterA (2019) Algorithmic circulation: how content creators navigate the effects of algorithms on their work. Computers and Composition54: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102521
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Routledge.
32.
HolikattiMJhaverSKumarN (2019) Learning to airbnb by engaging in online communities of practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359330
33.
JabagiNCroteauAAudebrandL, et al. (2019) Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology34(4): 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255
34.
JarrahiMHSutherlandW (2019) Algorithmic management and algorithmic competencies: understanding and appropriating algorithms in gig work. Information in Contemporary Society: 14th International Conference, Proceedings14: 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_55
35.
JørgensenKM (2016) The media go-along: researching mobilities with media at hand. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research32(60): 32–49. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.22429
36.
KhanMHWilliamsJWilliamsPMayesR (2023) Caring in the gig economy: a relational perspective of decent work. Work, Employment and Society38(4): 1107–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231173586
37.
KlawitterEHargittaiE (2018) “It’s like learning a whole other language”: the role of algorithmic skills in the curation of creative goods. International Journal of Communication12: 3490–3510. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-168021
38.
KoenigA (2020) The algorithms know me and I know them: using student journals to uncover algorithmic literacy awareness. Computers and Composition58: 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102611
39.
KwanH (2022) Women’s solidarity, communicative space, the gig economy’s social reproduction and labour process: the case of female platform drivers in China. Critical Sociology48(7-8): 1221–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221101451
40.
MerriamSBTisdellEJ (2016) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
41.
Oeldorf-HirschANeubaumG (2023) What do we know about algorithmic literacy? The status quo and a research agenda for a growing field. New Media & Society27(2): 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231182662
42.
PetriglieriGAshfordSJWrzesniewskiA (2019) Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly64(1): 124–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218759646
43.
PinkSHorstHPostillJ, et al. (2016) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage.
RosenblatA (2018) Uberland: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Rules of Work. University of California Press.
46.
SandbergJPinningtonAH (2009) Professional competence as ways of being: an existential ontological perspective. Journal of management studies46(7): 1138–1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00845.x
47.
ScolariCAMasanetMJGuerrero-PicoM, et al. (2018) Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: teens' transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El Profesional de la Información27(4): 1699–2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.09
48.
ScolariCAPiñaMGuerrero-PicoM (2024) Communication Platforms, Workforce and Informal Learning. White Paper of the PLATCOM Project. Pompeu Fabra University. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10230/58972.
49.
ShapiroA (2018) Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society20(8): 2954–2971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817738236
SutherlandWJarrahiMHDunnM, et al. (2020) Work precarity and gig literacies in online freelancing. Work, Employment & Society34(3): 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/095001701988651
WilsonLO (2016) Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s revised understanding the new version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The Second Principle1(1): 1–8.
57.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al. (2019) Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment & Society33(1): 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
58.
YuZTreréEBoniniT (2022) The emergence of algorithmic solidarity: unveiling mutual aid practices and resistance among Chinese delivery workers. Media International Australia183(1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221074793
59.
ZwettlerCStraubCSpurkD (2023) Kicking off a gig work career: unfolding a career learning cycle of gig workers. Journal of Career Assessment32(4): 650–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231212188
