The production of space through transmediated identity practices: Spatial self in Instagram at Mavibahçe Shopping Centre in İzmir

Abstract

Widespread use of locative media and its integration with social media applications has provided individuals with the new ways of identity practices. Through checking in at locations, uploading still and moving images of/with certain spaces, and adding hashtags to proliferate meanings, space has turned into a stage where self-identities are digitally practiced. Within this context, this article explores the production of space through these practices on Instagram in the case study of Mavibahçe Shopping Center in Izmir, Turkey. The analysis based on questionnaires and digital media surveys targets the converged space of the same digital and physical location of Mavibahçe with the aim of providing insights into the use of space for identity constructions. The study concludes that visitors reproduce space through transmediated identity practices in Instagram in order to demonstrate their affiliations to certain lifestyles as part of their digital habitus. While they perform these acts, they prefer to use the spatial attributes that they favor as the background setting of their spatial self and tag only affirmative hashtags for their spatial experiences along with these representations, which reproduce the space of the chosen architectural settings in the digital media.

Keywords

Digital habitus digital space identity practices Instagram locative media self-presentation social media spatial self production of space

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acun

(2011) Her Dem Yeniden Doğmak: Online Sosyal Ağlar ve Kimlik. Milli Folklör 23(89): 66–77.

Al-Mahmood

(2019) Envisioning online learning: Identity and spatiality performances. In: Moss

(ed) Researching Education: Visually, Digitally, Spatially. Leiden: Sense, pp. 147–182.

Backes

(1997) Reading the shopping mall city. Journal of Popular Culture 31(3): 1–17.

Barkhuus

Brown

Bell

, et al. (2008) From awareness to repartee: Sharing location within social groups. In: Proceedings of CHI’08 (eds, Czerwinski

Lund

Tan

), Florence, Italy, 5–10 April 2008, pp. 497–506. New York: ACM Press.

Baydar

Kılınç

Yılmaz

(2019) Discrepant spatial practices: Contemporary social housing projects in Izmir. In: Kılınç

Gharipour

(eds) Social Housing in the Middle East: Architecture, Urban Development and Transnational Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 291–319.

Baydar

Komesli

Yılmaz

, et al. (2018) Digitizing Lefebvre’s spatial triad. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33(1): 6–20.

Bennett

Emmison

Frow

(1999) Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu

(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Buckingham

(2008) ‘Introducing Identity’, Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 1–24.

10.

Canclini

(2009) How digital convergence is changing cultural theory. Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture 7(3): 140–146.

11.

Castells

(1996) The Information Age: The Rise of The Network Society. West Sussex: Blackwell.

12.

Centner

(2008) Places of privileged consumption practices: Spatial capital, the dot-com habitus, and San Francisco’s Internet boom. City and Community 7(3): 193–223.

13.

Cohen

(1996) From town center to shopping center: The reconfiguration of community marketplaces in postwar America. American Historical Review 101(4):1050–1081.

14.

De Souza e Silva

Frith

(2012) Mobile Interfaces in Public Spaces: Locational Privacy, Control, and Urban Sociability. New York: Routledge (Kindle Addition).

15.

Desrochers

Andreassi

Thompson

(2002) Identity theory. WCOB Faculty Publications. Available at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/wcob_fac/255 (accessed August 2017).

16.

Dijck

(2013) ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture and Society 35(2): 199–215.

17.

Elwell

(2014) The transmediated self: Life between the digital and the analog. Convergence 20(2): 23–249.

18.

Erkip

(2005) The rise of the shopping mall in Turkey: The use and appeal of a mall in Ankara. Cities 22(2): 89–108.

19.

Feinberg

Meoli

(1991) A brief history of the mall. In: Solomon

Holman

(eds) Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 18. Provo: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 426–427.

20.

Galloway

Ward

(2006) Locative media as socializing and spatializing practice: Learning from archaeology. Leonardo Online 14(3): 1–9. Cambridge: MIT Press.

21.

Goffman

(1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

22.

Güzel

(2016) Dijital Kültür ve Çevrimiçi Sosyal Ağlarda Rekabetin Aktörü: Dijital Habitus. E-GİFDER 4(1): 82–103. Gümüşhane: Gümüşhane Üniversitesi.

23.

Haan

Leander

(2011) The construction of ethnic boundaries in classroom interaction through social space. Culture and Psychology 17(3): 319–338.

24.

Hillis

Petit

(2015) From webcams to Facebook: Gay/queer man and the performance of situatedness-in-displacement. In: Mains

Cupples

Lukinbeal

(eds) Mediated Geographies and Geographies of Media. New York; London: Springer, pp. 261–272.

25.

Hogg

Terry

White

(1995) A tale of two theories: a critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4): 225–269. Washington: American Sociological Association. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2787127 (accessed August 2017).

26.

Kahraman

(2016) Coffee or coffee at Starbucks? Evaluation of Starbucks shops in terms of consumption culture and life styles. Turkish Studies 11(2): 611–628. Available at: http://www.turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/685919753_28KahramanAhmetBurak-sos-611-628.pdf (accessed March 2019).

27.

Kale

GÖ

(2016) Sosyal Ağlarda Eğlence Faktörü Kullaniminin Marka Kişiliğine Etkisi: Starbucks Türkiye Instagram Hesabinin Analizi. TRT Akademi 1(1): 154–169.

28.

Kocabalkanlı

Yılmaz

(2016) Analysis of urban boundaries through visualization: Emlak Bankasi mass housing projects in Karşiyaka. In: CPUD ‘16 international city planning and urban design conference, Istanbul, 8–9 April. Available at: https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/1030284/221422/Pagine%20da%20CPUD%2016%20PROCEEDINGS%20BOOK.pdf (accessed March 2019).

29.

Kuyumcu

(2010) The Development of Shopping Centers in Turkey: The Case of Denizli. Unpublished Master Thesis, Izmir Institute of Technology.

30.

Lefebvre

(1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

31.

Lemos

(2008a) Locative media and informational territories: Mobile communication and new sense of places. In: Second Inclusiva-net Platform Meeting. Available at: https://vdocuments.net/5228.html (accessed August 2019).

32.

Lemos

(2008b) Mobile communication and new sense of places: A critique of spatialization in cyberculture. Revista Galáxia 16: 91–108. Available at: http://www.revistas.univerciencia.org/index.php/galaxia/article/viewFile/6666/6026 (accessed July 2017).

33.

Mavibahçe Dergi (2015) İnsancıl Doğal ve Izmirli. Mavi bahçe Dergi 1: 34–39. Available at: https://issuu.com/mavibahce/docs/mavi_bahce_web.compressed/34 (accessed March 2019).

34.

McQuire

(2008) The Media City. London: SAGE.

35.

Meer

Müller

(2017) ‘They treat us like we’re not there’: Queer bodies and the social production of healthcare space. Health and Place 45: 92–98.

36.

Mitchell

(2003) Me++ The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

37.

Noe

Whitaker

Chorley

, et al. (2016) Birds of a feather locate together? Foursquare Check-ins and Personality Homophily, Computers in Human Behavior 58: 343–353. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216300097?via%3Dihub (accessed September 2017).

38.

North

Snyder

Bulfin

(2008) Digital tastes: Social class and young people’s technology use, information. Communication and Society 11(7): 895–911. Oxford: Routledge.

39.

Özkul

(2015) Location as a sense of place: Everyday life, mobile, and spatial practices in urban spaces. In: De Souza e Silva

Sheller

(eds) Mobility and Locative Media. Oxon: Routledge by Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 101–116.

40.

Papacharissi

(2011) Conclusion: A networked self. In: Papacharissi

(ed) A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 304–318.

41.

Papacharissi

Easton

(2013) In the habitus of the new: Structure, agency, and the social media habitus. In: Hartley

Burgess

Bruns

(eds) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. West Sussex: Blackwell, pp. 171–184.

42.

Papacharissi

Streeter

Gillespie

(2013) Culture digitally: Habitus of the new. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 57(4): 596–607. Oxford: Routledge.

43.

Parkc

(2009) Critical concepts: Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘habitus’ and the political economy of the media. Democratic Communiqué 23(1). Available at: http://journals.fcla.edu/demcom/article/view/76369/74024 (accessed September 2017).

44.

Relph

(1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.

45.

Robinson

(2009) A taste for the necessary. Information, Communication and Society 12(4): 488–507. Oxon: Routledge by Taylor & Francis Group.

46.

Schwartz

(2015) Online place attachment: Exploring technologies ties to physical places. In: De Souza e Silva

Sheller

(eds) Mobility and Locative Media. Oxon: Routledge by Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 85–100.

47.

Schwartz

Halegoua

(2015) The spatial self: location-based identity performance on social media. New Media and Society 17(10): 1643–1660.

48.

Schmidt

(2008) The practices and process of neighborhood: The (re)production of Riverwest, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Urban Geography 29(5): 473–495.

49.

Sterne

(2003) Bourdieu, technique and technology. Cultural Studies 17(3–4): 367–389. Oxford: Routledge.