Memes against sexism? A multi-method analysis of the feminist protest hashtag #distractinglysexy and its resonance in the mainstream news media

Abstract

Hashtag feminism has become a popular tactic of online protest against gender inequality. Using the Twitter hashtag #distractinglysexy, women scientists posted pictures of themselves in labs or during field research to contest misogynist remarks by Nobel laureate Tim Hunt. We examined the resulting humorous and memetic discourse on Twitter as well as its coverage in news media combining a content analysis of the multimodal tweets with a qualitative discourse analysis of German and British news media. The results show that the ironic memes in which researchers addressed sexism in academia by parodying social norms and ideals of ‘sexiness’ yielded substantial media attention, but with differences in the two countries: While the hashtag #distractinglysexy initiated a broader debate on sexism and discrimination in academia in the UK news media discourse, in the German context, this form of ‘self-mediation’ was portrayed either as ‘something funny on the Web’ or as a harmful firestorm.

Keywords

Hashtag feminism memes networked public sphere selfies social media Twitter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baer

(2016) Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. Feminist Media Studies 16(1): 17–34. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1093070.

Barnard

(2016) Spectacles of self(ie) empowerment? Networked individualism and the logic of the (post)feminist selfie. Communication and Information Technologies Annual 11: 63–88. DOI: 10.1108/S2050-206020160000011014.

Barthes

(1977 [1964]) Image – Music – Text, Heath

(transl. and ed.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

Bell

Milic

(2002) Goffman’s gender advertisements revisited: Combining content analysis with semiotic analysis. Visual Communication 1(2): 203–222. DOI: 10.1177/147035720200100205.

Benkler

(2006) The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Bennett

Segerberg

Walker

(2014) Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society 17(2): 232–260. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.870379.

Boxman-Shabtai

Shifman

(2014) Evasive targets: Deciphering polysemy in mediated humor. Journal of Communication 64(5): 977–998. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12116.

Brantner

Rodriguez-Amat

(2016) New ‘danger zone' in Europe: Representations of place in social media–supported protests. International Journal of Communication 10: 299–320. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3788/1538

Bruns

Burgess

(2015) Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In: Rambukkana

(ed) Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 13–28.

10.

Bruns

Moon

Paul

, et al. (2016) Towards a typology of hashtag publics: A large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics. Communication Research and Practice 2(1): 20–46.

11.

Buchsteiner

(2015) Sir Tim Hunt weint auf dem Sofa [Sir Tim Hunt cries on the couch]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 11 June. Available at: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/menschen/sexismus-vorwuerfe-sir-tim-hunt-weint-auf-dem-sofa-13650596.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

12.

Burgess

Galloway

Sauter

(2015) Hashtag as hybrid forum: The case of #agchatoz. In: Rambukkana

(ed) Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 61–76.

13.

Butler

(1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531.

14.

Chouliaraki

(2010) Self-mediation: New media and citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 227–232.

15.

Clark

(2016) ‘Hope in a hashtag’: The discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies 16(5): 788–804.

16.

Day

(2008) Are they for real? Activism and ironic identities. The Electronic Journal of Communication 18(3-4). Available at: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/EJCPUBLIC/018/2/01846.html (accessed 15 December 2017).

17.

Die Welt (2015) Frauen im Labor bereiten Männern nur Probleme [Women in the lab only cause problems for men]. Die Welt, 11 June. Available at: https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article142308959/Frauen-im-Labor-bereiten-Maennern-nur-Probleme.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

18.

Dixon

(2014) Feminist online identity: Analyzing the presence of hashtag feminism. Journal of Arts and Humanities 3(7): 34–40.

19.

Drüeke

Zobl

(2016) Online feminist protest against sexism: The German-language hashtag #aufschrei. Feminist Media Studies 16(1): 35–54.

20.

Ellis

(2015) Picture perfect: How marketers can harness the power of images. The Guardian, 9 September. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2015/sep/09/picture-perfect-marketers-images-words (accessed 1 December 2016).

21.

Fincher

Tenenberg

(2005) Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems 22(3): 89–93.

22.

Grittmann

Ammann

(2011) Quantitative Bildtypenanalyse [Quantitative image content analysis]. In: Petersen

Schwender

(eds) Die Entschlüsselung der Bilder. Methoden zur Erforschung visueller Kommunikation. Ein Handbuch [Decoding images. Methods for researching visual communication. A handbook]. Köln: Herbert von Halem, pp. 163–177.

23.

Grohmann

Kamil Abdulsalam

Wyss

(2015) Selfie-Proteste zwischen Personalisierung und Anonymisierung [Selfie-protests between personalization and anonymization]. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 28(3): 62–72.

24.

Hall

(1966) The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.

25.

Hartley

(2010) Silly citizenship. Critical Discourse Studies 7(4): 233–248.

26.

Jackson

Foucault Welles

(2015) Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication 65(6): 932–952.

27.

Keller

(2013) Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: SAGE.

28.

Kharroub

Bas

(2016) Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society 18(9): 1973–1992.

29.

Koopmans

(2004) Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society 33(3-4): 367–391.

30.

Kress

Van Leeuwen

(1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.

31.

Ladipo

(2015) Der Professor, ein Scherz und der Mob [The professor, a joke and the mob]. Welt.de, 15 June. Available at: https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article142552990/Der-Professor-ein-Scherz-und-der-Mob.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

32.

Leavitt

(2014) From #FollowFriday to YOLO: Exploring the cultural salience of Twitter Memes. In: Weller

Bruns

Burgess

Mahrt

Puschmann

(eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 137–154.

33.

Lobinger

(2016) Photographs as things – photographs of things. A Texto-material perspective on photo-sharing practices. Information, Communication & Society 19(4): 475–488.

34.

Lobinger

Brantner

(2015) In the eye of the beholder: Subjective views on the authenticity of selfies. International Journal of Communication 9: 1848–1860. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3151/1404

35.

McLean

Maalsen

(2015) From #destroythejoint to far reaching digital activism: Feminist revitalisation stemming from social media and reaching beyond. In: Gordon

Mihailidis

(eds) Civic Media Project. Cambridge: MIT Press. Available at: http://civicmediaproject.org/works/civic-media-project/fromdestroythejointtofarreachingdigitalactivismfeministrevitalisation (accessed 1 December 2016).

36.

Mendes

(2011) Feminism in the News: Representations of the Women’s Movement since the 1960s. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

37.

Mendes

(2015) SlutWalk: Feminism, Activism and Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

38.

Miller

(2017) Phatic culture and the status quo: Reconsidering the purpose of social media activism. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 23(3): 251–269. DOI: 10.1177/1354856515592512.

39.

Milner

(2013) Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the occupy wall street movement. International Journal of Communication 7: 2357–2390.

40.

Milner

(2016) The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

41.

Mina

(2014) Batman, pandaman and the blind man: A case study in social change memes and internet censorship in China. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 359–375.

42.

Morozov

(2009) The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy, 19 May. Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/ (accessed 1 December 2016).

43.

Müller

(2015) Social Media. Welt.de, 16 June. Available at: https://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/debatte/article142555373/Social-Media.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

44.

Neuberger

Jo vom Hofe

Nuernbergk

(2014) The use of Twitter by professional journalists. Results of a newsroom survey in Germany. In: Weller

Bruns

Burgess

Mahrt

Puschmann

(eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 345–357.

45.

O’Keefe

(2014) My body is my manifesto! SlutWalk, Femen, and feminist protest. Feminist Review 107: 1–19.

46.

Pfeffer

Zorbach

Carley

(2014) Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. Journal of Marketing Communications 20(1-2): 117–128.

47.

Rentschler

Thrift

(2015) Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘binders full of women’ meme. Feminist Theory 16(3): 329–359.

48.

Rettberg

(2014) Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

49.

Rogers

(2014) Political research in the digital age. International Public Policy Review 8(1): 73–87.

50.

Rose

(2016) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed). Los Angeles: SAGE.

51.

Sanghani

(2015) Meet the anti-Barbie: Will these ‚geek chic’ dolls really get more girls into science? The Telegraph, 17 September. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11854476/Netflix-dolls-Science-Barbies-aimed-at-getting-girls-into-science.html (accessed 1 January 2018).

52.

Schmidt

(2014) Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In: Weller

Bruns

Burgess

Mahrt

Puschmann

(eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 3–14.

53.

Senft

Baym

(2015) What does the selfie say? Investigating a global phenomenon. International Journal of Communication 9: 1588–1906.

54.

Seo

(2014) Visual propaganda in the age of social media: An empirical analysis of Twitter images during the 2012 Israeli–Hamas conflict. Visual Communication Quarterly 21(3): 150–161. DOI: 10.1080/15551393.2014.955501.

55.

Sheehan

(2015) The selfie protest: A visual analysis of activism in the digital age. MSc Master’s Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.

56.

Shifman

(2013) Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(3): 362–377.

57.

Shifman

(2014a) Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

58.

Shifman

(2014b) The cultural logic of photo-based meme genres. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 340–358.

59.

Spiegel Online (2015) Forscherinnen protestieren mit Foto-Tweets [Women researchers protest with photo tweets], 12 June. Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/karriere/distractinglysexy-protest-gegen-tim-hunt-wegen-sexismus-a-1038467.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

60.

Süddeutsche Zeitung (2015) Forscherinnen geben Tim Hunt conta [Women researchers give Tim Hunt a contra]. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 12 June. Available at: http://www.sueddeutsche.de/bildung/nach-sexistischen-aeusserungen-wissenschaftlerinnen-geben-timothy-hunt-contra-1.2517680 (accessed 1 December 2016).

61.

The Guardian (2015) The Guardian view on the Tim Hunt affair. The Guardian, 30 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/30/the-guardian-view-on-the-tim-hunt-affair-an-explosive-combination-of-science-sexism-and-social-media (accessed 1 December 2016).

62.

Theocharis

Lowe

van Deth

, et al. (2015) Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society 18(2): 202–220.

63.

Thomas

(2015) Der Professor und die Frauen im Labor Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 19 July. Available at: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/medien/biochemiker-tim-hunt-wird-am-university-college-nicht-wieder-eingesetzt-13696412.html (accessed 1 December 2016).

64.

Thomas

Stehling

(2016) The communicative construction of FEMEN: Naked protest in self-mediation and German media discourse. Feminist Media Studies 16(1): 86–100. DOI: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1093111.

65.

Thrift

(2014) #YesAllWomen as feminist meme event. Feminist Media Studies 14(6): 1090–1092.

66.

Tiidenberg

(2014) Bringing sexy back: Reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 8(1): article 3. DOI: 10.5817/CP2014-1-3.

67.

Titscher

Wodak

Meyer

, et al. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.

68.

Vis

Faulkner

Parry

, et al. (2014) Twitpic-ing the riots: Analysing images shared on Twitter during the 2011 UK Riots. In: Weller

Bruns

Burgess

Mahrt

Puschmann

(eds) Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 385–398.

69.

White

(2010) Clicktivism is ruining leftist activism. The Guardian, 12 August. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/12/clicktivism-ruining-leftist-activism (accessed 1 December 2016).

70.

Williams

(2015) If we don’t raise a voice about sexism it will never go away. The Guardian, 14 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/14/sexism-misogyny-alex-salmond-tim-hunt (accessed 1 December 2016).

71.

Young

(1997) Changing the Wor(L)D: Discourse, Politics, and the Feminist Movement. New York: Routledge.

72.

Zychowicz

(2015) Performing protest: Femen, nation, and the marketing of resistance. Journal of Ukrainian Politics and Society 1(1): 79–104.