Compared to national-level studies research on parties’ issue salience in local politics remains significantly underdeveloped. How local party branches balance the general party ideology with local context when deciding which issues to prioritise is still not well understood. This article addresses this gap by examining the drivers of issue salience in local election manifestos, specifically investigating the extent to which it is determined by the national party organisation and place-based municipal conditions. Drawing on an unprecedented dataset of 262 local election manifestos from 36 municipalities across two election cycles in Flanders (Belgium), the study measures and explains the emphasis on 17 policy issues using a supervised machine learning approach. Findings indicate that local parties’ issue salience is influenced by both national party preferences and local context, demonstrating their role as strategic actors who make deliberate choices about which issues to emphasise and de-emphasise.
ArterD (ed) (2017) From Farmyard to City Square? The Electoral Adaptation of the Nordic Agrarian Parties. Routledge.
4.
BäckH (2003) Explaining and predicting coalition outcomes: conclusions from studying data on local coalitions. European Journal of Political Research42(4): 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00092
BlockS (2024a) Computational Science Methods in Social Science Research: Exploring Novel Dataset Creation Approaches and Innovative Empirical Measurements for text-as-data Research. Unpublished dissertation.
7.
BlockS (2024b) Parliamentary questions as an intra-coalition control mechanism in mixed regimes. European Political Science Review16(2): 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773923000322
8.
BlockmansTGeysBHeyndelsB, et al. (2013) De diepte van het water en de lengte van de brug. De duur van de coalitievorming. In: DeschouwerKVerthéTRihouxB (eds) Op zoek naar de kiezer. Lokale partijafdelingen en de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012. ASP, pp. 191–218.
9.
BoutecaNLefevreJ (2020) Lokale variaties in partijreputaties? De nationalisering van issue ownership in de lokale verkiezingen van 2018. In: DandoyRDodeigneJSteyversK, et al. (eds) Lokale kiezers hebben hun voorkeur: de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 2018 geanalyseerd. Vanden Broele, pp. 67–86.
10.
BraunD (2023) Text analysis of party manifestos. In: CarterNDanielKSindreGM, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties. Routledge, pp. 439–449.
11.
BroekemaHBFengerHJMVan der WaalJ (2021) Principals or puppets? Analysing variation in local political parties’ social policy positions. Acta Politica56: 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00161-9
12.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983a) Explaining and Predicting Elections. Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. George Allen & Unwin.
13.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983b) Party competition - selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In: DaalderHMairP (eds) West European Party Systems. Continuity and Change. Sage, pp. 267–305.
14.
BuelensJDumontPRihouxB, et al. (2008) Het standpunt van de partij. Wat is belangrijk voor de lokale afdelingen. In: BuelensJRihouxBDeschouwerK (eds) Tussen kiezer en hoofdkwartier. De lokale partijafdelingen en de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 2006. VUBPress, pp. 31–46.
15.
CaramaniD (2004) The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
DaltonRMcAllisterI (2015) Random walk or planned excursion? Continuity and change in the left-right positions of political parties. Comparative Political Studies48(6): 759–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014558257
18.
DandoyRDodeigneJSteyversK, et al. (2020) Lokale kiezers hebben hun voorkeur. De gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 2018 geanalyseerd. Vanden Broele.
19.
DassonnevilleRHoogheMMarienS, et al. (2013) De lokale kiezer. In: Het kiesgedrag bij de Belgische gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012. ASP.
20.
de NatrisJ (2025) Which factors influence issue salience in electoral manifestos? New insights from the salience of social services in Dutch local elections. Swiss Political Science Review31(2): 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12663
21.
DelobellePWintersTBerendtB (2020) RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based language model. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3255–3265.
22.
DelobellePWintersTBerendtB (2022). RobBERT-2022: updating a Dutch language model to account for evolving language use. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08192.
23.
DeschouwerK (1996) Nationale partijen en gemeenteraadsverkiezingen. In: BuelensJDeschouwerK (eds) De dorpsstraat is de wetstraat niet. VUBPress, pp. 13–25.
24.
DeschouwerK (2006) Political parties as multi-level organizations. In: KatzRCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. Sage, pp. 291–300.
GendźwiłłAKjærUSteyversK (2021) Municipal size and the nationalization of local party systems: the nationalized, localized and regionalized local party systems of Denmark, Poland and Belgium. In: LackowskaMSzmigiel-RawskaKTelesF (eds) Local Government in Europe: New Perspectives and Democratic Challenges. Bristol University Press, pp. 163–180.
29.
GendźwiłłAKjærUSteyversK (2022) Happily ever after’? Comparing local elections and voting in 40 European countries. In: GendźwiłłAKjærUSteyversK (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe. Routledge, pp. 489–531.
30.
GeserH (1999) The local party as an object of interdisciplinary comparative Study. Some steps toward theoretical integration. In: SaizMGeserH (eds). Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective. Routledge, 3–43.
GrossMJankowskiM (2020) Dimensions of political conflict and party positions in multi-level democracies: evidence from the Local Manifesto Project. West European Politics43(1): 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1602816
34.
GrossMNyhuisDBlockS, et al. (2024) Electoral campaigns and parliamentary practice: do parties pursue the issues they campaigned on?Swiss Political Science Review30(2): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12588
JanssenJKorstenAFA (2003) De wederopstanding van lokale lijsten. Bestuurswetenschappen57(2): 90–112.
37.
JuenC-MReuseRGrossM, et al. (2025) Party politics at the local level: introduction to the special issue. Swiss Political Science Review31(2): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12661
38.
KleinnijenhuisJPenningsP (2001) Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes, media coverage and voter perceptions. In: LaverM (ed) Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors. Routledge, pp. 162–182.
39.
KlingelhöferT (2016) Ensuring consistency across levels? The delegation model of multi-level party politics and Spanish framework manifestos. Party Politics22(4): 452–464. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814550431
40.
KlingemannH-DVolkensABudgeI, et al. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Parties, Electorates and Governments in Eastern Europe and the OECD 1990-2003. Oxford University Press.
41.
KlüverHSagarzazuI (2016) Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics39(2): 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295
42.
KraussSPraprotnikKGrossM (2025) Issue ownership and government participation. Explaining parties’ issue attention at the subnational level. Party Politics31(6): 1018–1036. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241306732
43.
KristensenTAGreen-PedersenCMortensenPB, et al. (2023a) Avoiding or engaging problems? Issue ownership, problem indicators, and party issue competition. Journal of European Public Policy30(12): 2854–2885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2135754
44.
KristensenTAMortensenPBGreen-PedersenC, et al. (2023b) The policy agenda effects of problem indicators: a comparative study in seven countries. Journal of Public Policy43(2): 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x22000307
45.
LoftisMWMortensenPB (2020) Collaborating with the machines: a hybrid method for classifying policy documents. Policy Studies Journal48(1): 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12245
46.
MortensenPBLoftisMWSeebergHB (2022) Explaining Local Policy Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
MüllerJ (2013) On a short leash? Sub-national party positions between regional context and national party Unity. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties23(2): 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2012.742092
OtjesSde NatrisJ (2023) Who gets the say in the coalition agreement? In: Paper Presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, 25 – 28 April 2023, Toulouse.
51.
PetrocikJR (1996) Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science40(3): 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
52.
ReuseR (2025) Does the left-right cleavage matter in local politics? An analysis of local party manifestos across municipal sizes. Swiss Political Science Review31(2): 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12639
53.
SeebergHB (2017) How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies65(2): 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224
54.
SeebergHB (2023) Avoidance and engagement: do societal problems fuel political parties’ issue attention?Party Politics29(2): 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211066415
55.
SeebergHBAdamsJ (2025) Citizens’ issue priorities respond to national conditions, less so to parties’ issue emphases. European Journal of Political Research64(2): 649–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12714
SteckerC (2015) Parties on the chain of federalism: position-taking and multi-level party competition in Germany. West European Politics38(6): 1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1029366
58.
SteyversK (2022) Belgium: between national barometer and local atmosphere. In: GendźwiłłAKjærUSteyversK (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe. Routledge, pp. 114–125.
59.
Van de VoordeNBoutecaNSchampT, et al. (2018) Birds of a feather or by note? Ideological nationalization of local electoral manifestos in Belgium. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government16(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4335/10.4335/16.1.1-24(2018)
WagnerMMeyerTM (2014) Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics37(5): 1019–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
WegschaiderKGrossMSchmidS (2022) Studying politics at the local level in Germany: a tale of missing data. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft16: 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-022-00551-7
