Exploring the politicisation and territorialisation of adult social care in the United Kingdom: Electoral discourse analysis of state-wide and meso elections 1998

Abstract

In the face of a global demographic shift, an aging population and a ‘crisis’ in adult social care (ASC), this study analyses over 3000 pledges on ASC in political parties’ manifesto discourse following the United Kingdom’s move to a multi-level electoral politics in 1998/1999. Although often overlooked, attention to this formative phase of social policy-making reveals the discursive political antecedents of welfare interventions. The analysis shows a major increase in issue-salience and party politicisation of ASC policy. The discourse reveals political cleavages on welfare mixes and policy framing, and sub-state resistance to central government policies. Against the backdrop of the international rise of devolved governance, the present case is of wider international significance because it illustrates how the transition from state-wide to (quasi-)federal electoral practices gives rise to new territorial dynamics in the electoral discourse of welfare provision; in turn, promoting territorialisation, pressure for welfare state expansion and the rise of ‘sub-state’ welfare regimes.

Keywords

Adult social care devolution elections party politicisation issue-salience manifesto

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmadi-Abhari

Guzman-Castillo

Bandosz

, et al. (2017) Temporal trend in dementia incidence since 2002 and projections for prevalence in England and Wales to 2040: modelling study. British Medical Journal 358: j2856. Available at: https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j2856

Alliance Party (2017) How to Change Northern Ireland for Good. Belfast: Alliance Party.

Asenova

Stein

Mccann

, et al. (2007) Private sector participation in health and social care services in Scotland: assessing the risk. International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(2): 275–292.

Béland

Lecours

(2008) Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borghi

Van Berkel

(2007) New modes of governance in Italy and the Netherlands: The case of activation policies. Public Administration 85(1): 83–101.

Breeze

(2011) Variations on a theme: Party manifesto discourses in the UK 2010 election. Revistade Estudios Culturales De Launiversitat Jaume I/Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume I IX: 9–30.

Brown

(1998) Asymmetrical devolution: The Scottish case. Political Quarterly 69(3): 215–223.

Carter

(2006) Party politicization of the environment in Britain. Party Politics 12(6): 747–767.

Chaney

(2017) Governance transitions’ and minority nationalist parties’ pressure for welfare state change: Evidence from Welsh and Scottish elections – And the UK’s ‘Brexit’ referendum. Global Social Policy 17(3): 279–306.

10.

Chaney

(2020) Examining political parties’ record on refugees and asylum seekers in UK party manifestos 1964-2019: The rise of territorial approaches to welfare? Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2020.1839620

11.

Clarke

Sanders

Stewart

, et al. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Clarke

Sanders

Stewart

, et al. (2011) Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain, 2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(2): 237–253.

13.

Cole

(2009) Hard and soft commitments to human rights treaties, 1966–2001. Sociological Forum 24(3): 44–51.

14.

Conservative Party (2001) Time for Common Sense. London: Conservative Party.

15.

Conservative Party (2010) Invitation to Join the Government of Britain. London: Conservative Party.

16.

Conservative Party (2015) A Brighter, More Secure Future. London: Conservative Party.

17.

Conservative Party (2017) Forward Together. London: Conservative Party.

18.

Conservative Party (2019) Get Brexit Done, Unleash Britain’s Potential. London: Conservative Party.

19.

Costa-Font

(2010) Does devolution lead to regional inequalities in welfare activity? Environment and Planning – Part C 28(3): 435–451.

20.

Daly

Lewis

(2000) The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology 51(2): 281–298.

21.

Democratic Unionist Party (2011) Moving Forward. Belfast: DUP.

22.

Democratic Unionist Party (2016) Our Plan for Northern Ireland. Belfast: DUP.

23.

Downs

(1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

24.

Glasby

Zhang

Bennett

, et al. (2020) A lost decade? A renewed case for adult social care reform in England. Journal of Social Policy 50: 406–437.

25.

Government Office for Science (2016) Future of an Ageing Population. London: Government Office for Science. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/816458/future-of-an-ageing-population.pdf

26.

Hopkin

Bradbury

(2006) British state-wide parties and multilevel politics. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36(1): 135–152.

27.

House of Commons Select Committee on Health (2020) Report on Social Care: Funding and Workforce. London: House of Commons. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5801/cmselect/cmhealth/206/20602.htm

28.

Ifan

Poole

(2018) The Welsh Tax Base: Risks and Opportunities after Fiscal Devolution. Cardiff: Wales Governance Centre Cardiff University and Wales Centre for Public Policy. Available at: https://www.wcpp.org.uk/publication/the-welsh-tax-base-risks-and-opportunities-after-fiscal-devolution/

29.

Impero Wilson

(2000) Deficit reduction as causal story: Strategic politics and welfare state retrenchment. Social Science Journal 37(1): 97–121.

30.

Jæger

Kvist

(2003) Pressures on state welfare in post-industrial societies: Is more or less better? Social Policy and Administration 37(6): 555–572.

31.

Katz

Mair

(1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the modern cartel party. Party Politics 1: 5–28.

32.

Kavanagh

(1992) Electoral Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Kingston

Comas-Herrera

Jagger

(2018) Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years. The Lancet: Public Health 3(9): e447–e455. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30118-X

34.

Knapp

Comas-Herrera

Somani

, et al. (2007) Dementia: Summary Report for the National Audit Office. London: LSE. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/3353/1/dementia_international_comparison_%28published_version%29.pdf

35.

Labour Party (2001) Ambitions for Britain. London: Labour Party.

36.

Labour Party (2005) A Future Fair for All. London: Labour Party.

37.

Labour Party (2015) Britain Can Be Better. London: Labour Party.

38.

Labour Party (2019) It’s Time for Real Change. London: Labour Party.

39.

Laffin

Shaw

(2007) British devolution and the labour party: How a national party adapts to devolution. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(1): 55–72.

40.

Lewis

(2004) Chapter 8: The state and the third sector in modern welfare states: independence, instrumentality, partnership. In: Evers

Laville

J-L

(eds) The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 144–165.

41.

Liberal Democrats (2001) Freedom, Justice, Honesty. London: Liberal Democrats.

42.

Liberal Democrats (2005) The Real Alternative. London: Liberal Democrats.

43.

Liberal Democrats (2010) Change that Works for You. London: Liberal Democrats.

44.

Liberal Democrats (2017) Change Britain’s Future. London: Liberal Democrats.

45.

Liberal Democrats (2015) Opportunity for Everyone. London: Liberal Democrats.

46.

Liberal Democrats (2019) Stop Brexit: Build a Brighter Future. London: Liberal Democrats.

47.

Lindblom

(1959) The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19: 79–88.

48.

López-santana

Moyer

(2012) Decentralising the active welfare state: The relevance of intergovernmental structures in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy 41(4): 769–788.

49.

Massetti

(2018) Left-wing regionalist populism in the ‘Celtic’ peripheries: Plaid Cymru and the Scottish National Party’s anti-austerity challenge against the British Elites. Comparative European Politics 16(6): 937–953.

50.

Mayntz

Derlien

H-U

(1989) Party patronage and politicization of the West German administrative Elite 1970–1987 - Toward Hybridization? Governance 2: 384–404. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1989.tb00099.x

51.

Office for National Statistics (2019) Overview of the UK population: August 2019. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/august2019 (accessed 2 March 2021).

52.

Pierson

(1995) Fragmented welfare states: Federal institutions and the development of social policy. Governance 8(4): 449–478.

53.

Plaid Cymru (1999) The Manifesto of Plaid Cymru. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.

54.

Plaid Cymru (2007) Make a Difference. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.

55.

Plaid Cymru (2016) The Change Wales Needs. Cardiff: Plaid Cymru.

56.

Rein

Schön

(1993) Reframing policy discourse. In: Fischer

Forester

(eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 145–166.

57.

Robertson

Appleby

Evans

, et al. (2019) Public Satisfaction with the NHS and Social Care in 2018: Results from the British Social Attitudes Survey. London: King’s Fund & Nuffield Trust.

58.

Rocco

(2017) Informal caregiving and the politics of policy drift in the United States. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 29: 413–432.

59.

Scottish Conservative Party (1999) Scotland First. Edinburgh: Scottish Conservative Party.

60.

Scottish Conservative Party (2016) A Strong Opposition, A Strong Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Conservative Party.

61.

Scottish Labour Party (2007) Building Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.

62.

Scottish Labour Party (2016) Invest in Scotland’s Future. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour Party.

63.

Scottish National Party (1999) Scotland’s Party: Scotland’s Parliament. Edinburgh: SNP.

64.

Scottish National Party (2003) The Complete Case for A Better Scotland. Edinburgh: SNP.

65.

Scottish National Party (2007) It’s Time. Edinburgh: SNP.

66.

Scottish National Party (2011) Re-Elect a Scottish Government Working for Scotland. Edinburgh: SNP.

67.

Scottish National Party (2016) Re-Elect a Scottish Government Working for Scotland. Edinburgh: SNP.

68.

Scottish Liberal Democratic Party (1999) Raising the Standard. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats.

69.

Scottish Liberal Democratic Party (2003) Make the Difference. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats.

70.

Scottish Liberal Democratic Party (2007) Scotland Has a Bright Future. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats.

71.

Scottish Liberal Democratic Party (2011) Solutions for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Liberal Democrats.

72.

Scottish Liberal Democratic Party (2016) Be the Best Again. Edinburgh: Scottish Labour.

73.

Sinn Féin (2016) Better with Sinn Féin. Dublin: Sinn Féin.

74.

Social Democratic Labour Party (2016) Build A Better Future. Belfast: SDLP.

75.

Spicker

(1988) Principles of Social Welfare. London: Routledge.

76.

Stokes

(1992) Valence politics. In: Kavanagh

(ed.) Electoral Politics. Oxford: Clarendon University Press, pp. 80–100.

77.

Ulster Unionist Party (2007) For All of Us. Belfast: UUP.

78.

United Nations (2015) World Population Ageing: Report. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, United Nations.

79.

United Nations (2019) World Population Prospects 2019. New York: United Nations. Available at https://population.un.org/wpp/

80.

Vampa

(2014) Territorial mobilization and sub-state welfare governance in Italy and Spain Comparing four regional case studies. Paper circulated at the 2014 ECPR Conference, Glasgow, Scotland. Available at: http://ecpr.eu/events/panellist.aspx?EventID=12 (accessed 24 February 2021).

81.

Volkens

(2001) Quantifying the election programmes: Coding procedures & controls. In: Budge

(ed.) Mapping Policy Preferences: Parties, Electors & Governments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–59.

82.

Walgrave

De Swert

(2007) Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics 12: 37–67.

83.

Welsh Conservatives (1999) Fair Play for All. Cardiff: Welsh Conservatives.

84.

Welsh Conservatives (2016) Securing Real Change for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Conservatives.

85.

Welsh Labour Party (1999) Working Hard for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour.

86.

Welsh Labour Party (2003) Working Together for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour.

87.

Welsh Labour Party (2007) Building A Better Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.

88.

Welsh Labour Party (2011) Standing Up for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.

89.

Welsh Labour Party (2016) Together for Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Labour Party.

90.

Welsh Liberal Democrats (2003) Deliver the Difference for W ales. Cardiff: Welsh Liberal Democrats.

91.

Welsh Liberal Democrats (2007) A Fair, Green Future. Cardiff: Welsh Liberal Democrats.

92.

Welsh Liberal Democrats (2011) Wales Can Do Better. Cardiff: Welsh Liberal Democrats.

93.

Wittenberg

Hancock

(2015) Projections of demand and expenditure on adult social care 2015 to 2040. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2944. London: LSE.

Exploring the politicisation and territorialisation of adult social care in the United Kingdom: Electoral discourse analysis of state-wide and meso elections 1998–2019

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References