What are the effects of party defections on the attitudes of politicians who remain loyal to the party? We answer by combining multiple sources of data into a comprehensive novel data set on parliamentary party switching, to estimate how this affects the perceived distance between a politician and his party. Focusing on the theory of cognitive dissonance and the black sheep effect, we hypothesize that politicians perceive themselves closer to their parties when those parties recently suffered defections. The effect should be greater among incumbent politicians as they directly experience divisions, but also among officials dissatisfied with the leadership as their dissonance should be stronger. Statistical analyses of data from two elite surveys, on a sample of 13,256 politicians belonging to 92 parties that ran in 28 elections held between 2005 and 2015 in 14 countries, provide support for our hypotheses and shed light on the consequences of intra-party defections.
BäckHDebusMMüllerWC (2016) Intra-party diversity and ministerial selection in coalition governments. Public Choice166(3-4): 355–378.
2.
BakkerBNKlemmensenRNørgaardAS, et al. (2016) Stay loyal or exit the party? How openness to experience and extroversion explain vote switching. Political Psychology37(3): 419–429.
3.
BranscombeNRWannDLNoelJG, et al. (1993) In-group or out-group extremity: importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin19(4): 381–388.
4.
CarrollRKuboH (2019) Measuring and comparing party ideology and heterogeneity. Party Politics25(2): 245–256.
5.
CCS (2016) Comparative Candidates Survey Module I – 2005–2013 [Dataset – cumulative file], Version 3.1. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne, 2016. Available at: http://forscenter.ch/en/ (accessed 7 July 2017).
6.
CCS (2018) Comparative Candidates Survey Module II – 2013–2018 [Dataset – cumulative file]. Distributed by FORS, Lausanne, 2018. Available at: http://forscenter.ch/en/ (accessed 11 May 2019).
7.
CeronA (2016) Inter-factional conflicts and government formation: Do party leaders sort out ideological heterogeneity?Party Politics22(6): 797–808.
8.
CeronA (2017) Intra-party politics in 140 characters. Party Politics23(1): 7–17.
9.
CeronAGreeneZ (2019) Verba volant, scripta manent? Intra-party politics, party conferences, and issue salience in France. Party Politics25(5): 701–711.
10.
ClarkM (2009) Valence and electoral outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–98. Electoral Studies28(1): 111–122.
11.
CloseCGherghinaSSierensV (2019) Prompting legislative agreement and loyalty: What Role for intra-party democracy?Parliamentary Affairs72(2): 387–405.
12.
DeschouwerKDepauwSAndréA (2014) Representing the people in parliaments. In: DeschouwerKDepauwS (eds) Representing the People: a Survey among Members of Statewide and Substate Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–18.
13.
DesposatoS (2009) Party switching in Brazil: causes, effects, and representation. In: HellerWBMershonC (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 109–144.
14.
Di VirgilioAGiannettiDPintoL (2012) Patterns of party switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 2008-2011. Rivista italiana di scienza politica42(1): 29–58.
15.
EidelmanSBiernatM (2003) Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology39(6): 602–609.
16.
EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (2002) Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology53(1): 161–186.
17.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18.
GreeneZDHaberM (2015) The consequences of appearing divided: an analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies37(1): 15–27.
19.
GroseCYoshinakaA (2003) The electoral consequences of party switching by incumbent members of congress, 1947–2000. Legislative Studies Quarterly28(1): 55–75.
20.
HellerWBMershonC (2005) Party switching in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1996-2001. Journal of Politics67(2): 536–559.
21.
HellerWBMershonC (2009a) Introduction: legislative party switching, parties, and party systems. In: HellerWBMershonC (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–28.
22.
HellerWBMershonC (2009b) Legislator preferences, party desires: the impact of party switching on legislative party positions. In: HellerWBMershonC (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 173–199.
23.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
HugSWüestR (2011) Ideological positions of party switchers. Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
25.
IbenskasR (2019) Electoral competition after party splits. Political Science Research and Methods. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2019.15
26.
KamCJ (2009) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LaverMBenoitK (2003). The evolution of party systems between elections. American Journal of Political Science47(2): 215–233.
28.
MarinovaD (2016) Coping with Complexity: How Voters Adapt to Unstable Parties. London: ECPR Press.
29.
MarquesJMPaezD (1994) The ‘black sheep effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European review of social psychology5(1): 37–68.
30.
Martocchia DiodatiN (2017) Passing time, changing minds? The determinants of faction membership after party fusion. Government and Opposition54: 585–606.
31.
McLaughlinE (2012) Electoral regimes and party-switching: floor-crossing in South Africa’s local legislatures. Party Politics18(4): 563–579.
32.
McMenaminIGwiazdaA (2011) Three roads to institutionalisation: vote-, office- and policy-seeking explanations of party switching in Poland. European Journal of Political Research50(6): 838–866.
33.
MershonC (2014) Legislative party switching. In: MartinSSaalfeldTStrømKW (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 418–435.
34.
MershonCShvetsovaO (2013) Party System Change in Legislatures Worldwide: Moving Outside the Electoral Arena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
MershonCShvetsovaO (2014) Change in parliamentary party systems and policy outcomes: hunting the core. Journal of Theoretical Politics26(2): 331–351.
36.
NokkenTP (2000) Dynamics of congressional loyalty: party defection and roll call behavior, 1947–1997. Legislative Studies Quarterly25(3): 417–444.
37.
NokkenTP (2009) Party switching and the procedural party agenda in the US House of Representatives. In: HellerWBMershonC (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 81–108.
38.
O’brienDZShomerY (2013) A cross-national analysis of party switching. Legislative Studies Quarterly38(1): 111–141.
39.
OrbellJMSchwartz-SheaPSimmonsRT (1984) Do cooperators exit more readily than defectors?. American Political Science Review78(1): 147–162.
40.
PoguntkeTScarrowSEWebbPD (2016) Party rules, party resources, and the politics of parliamentary democracies: how parties organize in the 21st Century. Party Politics22(6): 661–678.
41.
RulloMPresaghiFLiviS (2015) Reactions to ingroup and outgroup deviants: an experimental group paradigm for black sheep effect. PLoS One10(5): e0125605.
42.
SacchiSCarnaghiACastelliniFColomboM (2013) Group merger between political parties: the role of the ingroup projection process. Political Psychology34(1): 91–105.
43.
SaniFReicherS (1998) When consensus fails: an analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology28(4): 623–645.
44.
SchumacherGElmelund-PræstekærC (2018) Party performance explains disagreement between politicians and their parties. West European Politics41(2): 329–349.
45.
SteinerNDMaderM (2019) Intra-party heterogeneity in policy preferences and its effect on issue salience: developing and applying a measure based on elite survey data. Party Politics25(3): 336–348.
46.
TajfelH (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology33(1): 1–39.
47.
Van VugtMHartCM (2004) Social identity as social glue: the origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86(4): 585–598.
48.
VolpiE (2019) Ideology and party switching: a comparison of 12 West European countries. Parliamentary Affairs72(1): 1–20.
49.
YoshinakaA (2015) Crossing the Aisle: Party Switching by US Legislators in the Postwar Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
