What are the factors that lead to variation in the clientelistic use of state resources in electoral contexts? In this article I provide one answer to this question by focusing on the role of intra-party politics and analyzing the empirical case of patronage jobs in the Argentine provinces between 1984 and 2001. Patronage jobs in provincial administrations help governors build political support both in their own party and with the general public. However, when governors need their party (leader)’s support for their political careers and when the national party leadership position is open to competition, they reduce their clientelistic efforts not to lose the party’s (or party leader’s) support. The statistical analysis of public employment confirms this prediction that patronage is lower when the party’s (or party leader’s) support is important for politicians and when the leadership position within parties is open to competition.
Abramowitz AI ( 1991) Incumbency, campaign spending, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics53: 34-56.
2.
Acuña C., Galiani S. and Tomassi M. ( 2004) "Understanding reform: the case of Argentina". manuscript.
3.
Auyero J. ( 2001) Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
Beck N. and Katz JN ( 1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Review of Political Science89: 634-647.
5.
Beck N. and Katz JN ( 2001) Throwing out the baby with the bathwater: a comment on Green, Yoon and Kim. International Organizations55: 487-495.
6.
Benton AL ( 2001) Patronage games: economic reform, political institutions, and the decline of party stability in Latin America. Dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
7.
Benton AL ( 2007) The strategic struggle for patronage: political careers, state largesse, and factionalism in LatinAmerican parties. Journal of Theoretical Politics19: 55-82.
8.
Bettcher KE ( 2005) Factions of interest in Japan and Italy. Party Politics11: 339-358.
9.
Brambor T., Clark WR and Golder M. ( 2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis14: 63-82.
10.
Brusco V., Nazareno M. and Stokes S. ( 2004) Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review39: 66-88.
11.
Cain B., Ferejohn J. and Fiorina M. ( 1987) The Personal Vote; Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Calvo E. ( 2007) The responsive legislature: public opinion and law making in a highly disciplined legislature. British Journal of Political Science37: 263-280.
13.
Calvo E. and Micozzi JP ( 2005) The governor’s backyard: a seat-vote model of electoral reform for subnational multiparty races. Journal of Politics67: 1050-1074.
14.
Calvo E. and Murillo MV ( 2004) Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. American Journal of Political Science48: 742-757.
15.
Calvo E. and Murillo MV ( 2008) When parties meet voters: partisan networks and distributive expectations in Argentina and Chile. Paper presented at the 2008 American Political Science Meeting, Boston, MA.
16.
Chandra K. ( 2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Chubb J. ( 1982) Patronage, Power, and Poverty in Southern Italy: A Tale of Two Cities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Coppedge, M. ( 1994) Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Cover AD ( 1977) One good term deserves another: the advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science21: 523-542.
20.
Cox GW and McCubbins MD ( 1986) Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics48: 370-389.
21.
Dahlberg M. and Johansson E. ( 2002) On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments . American Political Science Review85(1): 46-57.
22.
De Luca M. ( 2008) Political recruitment and candidate selection in Argentina: presidents and governors, 1983 to 2006. Pathways to Power Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. In: Sivalis P and Morganstern S (eds). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 189-217.
23.
Denemark D. ( 2000) Partisan pork barrel in parliamentary systems: Australian constituency-level grants. Journal of Politics62: 896-915.
24.
Dixit A. and Londregan J. ( 1996) The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. Journal of Politics58: 1132-1155.
25.
Geddes B. ( 1994) Politician’s Dilemma; Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
Gervasoni CH ( 2005) Polyarquía a nivel sub-nacional: aspectos conceptuales y normativos en el contexto de las democracias federales. Colección16: 83-122.
27.
Gordin JP ( 2003) Unraveling the politics of intergovernmental transfers: comparative evidence from Argentina and Spain. Paper presented at the 2003 Midwest Political Science Association Annual National Conference, Chicago, IL.
28.
Greene KF ( 2007) Why Dominant Parties Lose Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Helmke G. ( 2003) Checks and balances by other means: strategic defection and Argentina’s Supreme Court in the 1990s. Comparative Politics35: 213-230.
30.
Hicken AD ( 2007) How do rules and institutions encourage vote buying? Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. In: Schaffer FC (ed.) Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener, pp. 145-160.
31.
Jones MP, Sanguinetti P. and Tommasi M. ( 2000) Politics, institutions, and fiscal performance in a federal system: an analysis of the Argentine provinces. Journal of Development Economics61: 305-333.
32.
Keefer P. and Vlaicu R. ( 2006) Democracy, credibility and clientelism. Manuscript.
33.
Keele L. and Kelly NJ ( 2004) Dynamic models for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. manuscript.
34.
Kemahlioglu O. ( 2006) When the agent becomes the boss: the politics of public employment in Argentina and Turkey. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.
35.
Kitschelt H. ( 2000) Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies33: 845-879.
36.
Kristensen IP and Wawro GJ ( 2004) Lagging the dog? The robustness of panel corrected standard errors in the presence of serial correlation and observation specific effects . Manuscript.
37.
Levitsky S. ( 2003) Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Lyne M. ( 2007) In: Kitschelt H and Wilkinson HI (eds). Patrons, Clients, and Policies Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
McGuire JW ( 1997) Peronism without Peron: Unions, Parties and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
Magaloni B. ( 2006) Voting for Autocracy; Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Magaloni B., Diaz-Cayeros A. and Estevez F. ( 2007) Clientelism and portfolio diversification: a model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico. In: Kitschelt H and Wilkinson HI (eds). Patrons, Clients, and Policies Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-205.
42.
Mainwaring SP ( 1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
Manzetti L. ( 1993) Institutions, Parties, and Coalitions in Argentine Politics . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44.
Medina LF and Stokes S. ( 2002) Clientelism as political monopoly. Manuscript.
45.
Nichter S. ( 2008) Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Review of Political Science102: 19-31.
46.
O’Donnell G. ( 1996) Illusions about consolidation. Journal of Democracy7: 34-51.
47.
Panebianco A. ( 1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Pharr SJ ( 2000) In: Pharr S and Putnam D (eds). Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Piattoni S (ed.) (2001) Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation the European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Remmer K. ( 2007) The political economy of patronage: expenditure patterns in the Argentine provinces, 1983-2003. Journal of Politics69: 363-377.
51.
Remmer K. and Wibbels E. ( 2000) The subnational politics of economic adjustment: provincial politics and fiscal performance in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies33: 419-451.
52.
Robinson JA and Verdier T. ( 2002) The political economy of clientelism. Manuscript.
53.
Rock D. ( 1987) Argentina 1516-1987: From Spanish Colonization to Alfonsin . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
54.
Roemer J. ( 2001) Political Competition: Theory and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Romero LA ( 2002) A History of Argentina in the Twentieth Century. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
56.
Shefter M. ( 1994) Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
Stokes S. ( 2005) Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review99: 315-327.
58.
Stokes S. ( 2007) Is vote buying undemocratic? In: Schaffer FC (ed.) Elections for Sale; The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riener, pp. 81-100.
59.
Tomassi M. ( 2002) Federalism in Argentina and the reforms of the 1990s. Manuscript.
60.
Van de Walle N. ( 2001) African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979-1999. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Wantchekon L. ( 2003) Clientelism and voting behavior evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics55: 399-422.
62.
Wolfinger RE ( 1972) Why political machines have not withered away and other revisionist thoughts. Journal of Politics34: 365-398.
63.
Zuckerman A. ( 1979) The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
