Focus on quotas has shifted attention away from other, more comprehensive and strategic reforms aimed at furthering gender equality in political parties. This article concentrates on the gender action plans adopted by three Spanish parties. Using a gendered and institutional approach, it examines the conditions that led to the layering of these plans alongside existing party rules and assesses the outcome of such a gradual change. The results of the empirical analysis suggest that gender action plans have contributed not only to feminize the organization in terms of women’s numerical representation but also increasingly to regender it, thereby setting in motion a more profound change that challenges the foundations of gendered opportunities for political participation. The article also identifies the measures that have been less effective and pinpoints the reasons for the differential impact of gender equity institutional change across the various components of the party gender regime.
AckerJ (2006) Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society20(4): 441–464.
2.
BallingtonJ (2012) Empowering Women for Stronger Political Parties: A Guidebook to Promote Women’s Political Participation. UNDP & NDI.
3.
BeckwithK (2005) A common language of gender?Politics & Gender1(1): 128–137.
4.
BenschopYVerlooM (2011) Gender change, organizational change and gender equality strategies. In: JeanesEKnightsDYancey-MartinP (eds), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization. London: John Wiley, pp. 277–290.
5.
BjarnegårdE (2013) Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment. Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BjarnegårdEKennyM (2015) Revealing the secret garden: the informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics & Gender11(4): 748–753.
7.
BjarnegårdEKennyM (2016) Comparing candidate selection: a feminist institutionalist approach. Government and Opposition51(3): 370–392.
8.
BradburyJMitchellJBennieL, et al. (2000) Candidate selection, devolution and modernization: the selection of labour party candidates for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections. In: CowleyPDenverDRussellAHarrisonL (eds), British Elections and Parties Review, vol. 10. London: Frank Cass, pp. 151–172.
9.
BusteloM (2016) Three decades of state feminism and gender equality policies in multi-governed Spain. Sex Roles74(3–4): 107–120.
10.
ChappellL (2006) Comparing political institutions: revealing the gendered ‘logic of appropriateness’. Politics & Gender2(2): 223–235.
11.
ChappellLWaylenG (2013) Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration91(3): 599–615.
12.
ChildsS (2013) In the absence of electoral sex quotas: regulating political parties for women’s representation. Representation49(4): 401–423.
13.
ChildsSKittilsonMK (2016) Feminizing political parties: women’s party member organizations within European parliamentary parties. Party Politics22(5): 598–608.
14.
CollierD (2011) Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics44(4): 823–830.
15.
ConnellRW (1987) Gender & Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Council of Europe (1998) Conceptual Framework, Methodology and Presentation of Good Practices: Final Report of Activities of the Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming. EGS-MS. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
17.
FerreeMM (2012) Varieties of Feminism. German Gender Politics in Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18.
FreidenvallLKrookML (2011) Discursive strategies for institutional reform: gender quotas in Sweden and France. In: KrookMLMackayF (eds), Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave, pp. 42–57.
JohnsonN (2016) Keeping men in, shutting women out: gender biases in candidate selection processes in Uruguay. Government & Opposition51(3): 393–415.
21.
KenneySJ (1996) New research on gendered political institutions. Political Research Quarterly49(2): 445–466.
22.
KennyMVergeT (2016) Opening up the black box: gender and candidate selection in a new era. Government and Opposition51(3): 351–369.
23.
KittilsonMC (2013) Party politics. In: WaylenGCelisKKantolaJ, et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 536–553.
24.
LombardoEMergaertL (2013) Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training. A framework for studying implementation. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research21(4): 296–311.
LovenduskiJ (2011) Foreword. In: KrookMLMackayF (eds), Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave, pp. vii–xi.
27.
LowndesV (2014) How are things done around here? Uncovering institutional rules and their gendered effects. Politics and Gender10(4): 685–691.
28.
MackayF (2011) Conclusion: Towards a feminist institutionalism? In: KrookMLMackayF (eds), Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave, pp. 181–196.
29.
MackayF (2014) Nested newness, institutional innovation, and the gendered limits of change. Politics & Gender10(4): 549–571.
30.
MahoneyJThelenK (2010) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.
31.
MartínezM (2007) Llibre blanc sobre la representació de dones i homes en els partits verds europeus. Revista Nous Horitzons186: 34–58.
32.
McBrideDEMazurAG (2010) The Politics of State Feminism. Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33.
New York Times (2004) Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s Interview. 6 May [online edition].
34.
OSCE (2014) Handbook on Promoting Women’s Participation in Political Parties. Warsaw, Poland: OSCE/ODIHR.
35.
OSCE (2016) Compendium of Good Practices for Advancing Women’s Political Participation in the OSCE Region. Warsaw, Poland: OSCE/ODIHR.
36.
RoccoPThurstonC (2014) From metaphors to measures: observable indicators of gradual institutional change. Journal of Public Policy34(1): 35–62.
37.
SainsburyD (2004) Women’s political representation in Sweden: discursive politics and institutional presence. Scandinavian Political Studies27(1): 65–87.
38.
TanseyO (2007) Process tracing and elite interviewing. PS: Political Science and Politics40(4): 765–772.
39.
VergeT (2012) Institutionalising gender equality in Spain: incremental steps from party to electoral gender quotas. West European Politics35(2): 395–414.
40.
VergeT (2015) The gender regime of political parties: feedback effects between supply and demand. Politics & Gender11(4): 754–759.
41.
VergeTClaveriaS (2016) Gendered political resources: the case of party office. Party Politics24(5): 536–548.
42.
VergeTde la FuenteM (2014) Playing with different cards: party politics, gender quotas and women’s empowerment. International Political Science Review35(1): 67–79.
43.
VergeTEspírito-SantoA (2016) Interactions between party and legislative quotas: Candidate selection and quota compliance in Portugal and Spain. Government and Opposition51(3): 416–439.
44.
WaylenG (2014) Informal institutions, institutional change, and gender equality. Political Research Quarterly67(1): 212–223.
45.
WoodwardA (2003) European gender mainstreaming: promises and pitfalls of transformative policy. Review of Policy Research20(1): 65–88.
