Conditions for new parties’ participation in a founding election in a democratic transition

Abstract

The literature on democratic transitions considers the participation of new parties in the first pluralist election in a post-authoritarian context (founding election) as something to be taken for granted. As such, it is never questioned. Specialists in democratic transitions ignore the research on “new parties,” which is, nonetheless, essential to the understanding of the particular characteristics of a post-authoritarian situation. Using an original qualitative study on Algeria, this article proposes to bring to light the political, organizational, and legal conditions of new political parties’ participation or nonparticipation in a founding election. In particular, this research allows us to grasp the dilemmas and difficulties faced by leaders of new parties and the types of support on which they rely to engage for the first time in an electoral competition. The analytical framework stemming from this “case study” is applicable to other national case studies.

Keywords

democratic transition founding election Islamic party Middle East new parties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aït-Aoudia

(2013) The genesis of a partisan mobilization: continuities and politicization of charitable and religious activism within the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS). Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique (English version) 26(102): 129–146.

Babadji

(1992) Les élections locales en Algérie ou la commune au péril de la mosquée. Tumultes 1(1): 127–141.

Berrington

(1985) New parties in Britain: why some live and most die. International Political Science Review 6(4): 441–461.

Bogdanor

(1990) Founding elections and regime change. Electoral Studies 9(4): 288–294.

Bratton

van de Walle

(1997) Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brumberg

(1991) Islam, elections, and reform in Algeria. Journal of Democracy 2(1): 58–71.

Diamond

(2010) Why are there no Arab democracies? Journal of Democracy 21(1): 93–112.

Giddens

(1994[1990]) Les Conséquences de la Modernité. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Hamid

(2011) Arab Islamist parties: losing on purpose? Journal of Democracy 22(1): 68–80.

10.

Harmel

(1985) On the study of new political parties. International Political Science Review 6(4): 403–418.

11.

Hastings

(2001) Partis politiques et administration du sens. In: Andolfatto

Greffet

Olivier

(dir) Les Partis Politiques. Quelles Perspectives? Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 21–36.

12.

Hinnebusch

(2006) Authoritarian persistence, democratization theory and the Middle East: an overview and critique. Democratization 13(3): 373–395.

13.

Ilikoud

(2006) FFS et RCD: partis nationaux ou partis kabyles? Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée 111–112: 163–182.

14.

Kapil

(1991) Portrait statistique des élections du 12 juin 1990: chiffres-clés pour une analyse. Les Cahiers de l’Orient 23: 41–64.

15.

Le Sueur

(2010) Algeria Since 1989: Between Terror and Democracy. London: Zed Books.

16.

Lucardie

(2000) Prophets, purifiers and proluctors: towards a theory on the emergence of new parties. Party Politics 6(2): 175–185.

17.

Makri

(2010) Democratic transformation in Algeria: the role of the parties. In: Lawson

Ibrahim

(eds) Political Parties and Democracy. Volume V: The Arab World. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, pp. 119–143.

18.

Martinez

(2000) The Algerian Civil War, 1990-1998. New York: Columbia University Press, first edition [1998].

19.

Merani

(1999) La Fitna [la discorde]. Témoignage d’un Membre du Front Islamique du Salut. Alger: Auto-Editions.

20.

Mortimer

(1991) Islam and multiparty politics in Algeria. Middle East Journal 45(4): 575–592.

21.

O’Donnell

Schmitter

(1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

22.

Rahat

Hazan

(2001) Candidate selection methods: an analytical framework. Party Politics 7(3): 297–322.

23.

Reich

(2001) Coordinating party choice in founding elections: why timing matters. Comparative Political Studies 34(10): 1237–1263.

24.

Rochon

(1985) Mobilizers and challengers: toward a theory of new party success. International Political Science Review 6(4): 419–439.

25.

Snow

Trom

(2002) The case study and the study of social movements. In: Staggenborg

Klandermans

(eds) Methods of Social Movements Research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 146–172.

26.

Sztompka

(1996) Trust and emerging democracy: lessons from Poland. International Sociology 11(1): 37–62.

27.

Tavits

(2006) Party system change: testing a model of new party entry. Party Politics 12(1): 99–119.

28.

Tezcür

(2010) The moderation theory revisited: the case of Islamic political actors. Party Politics 16(1): 69–88.

29.

Weber

(1995[Harmonization]) Economie et Société/1. Les Catégories de la Sociologie. Paris: Agora Les classiques.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB