I consider how asymmetric information between the party selectorate and members of Parliament affects the renomination of incumbent candidates. By applying an adverse selection model, I argue that the selectorate looks to past performance to select candidates it expects will gain influence. However, the impact of performance varies according to the need for and availability of information. The European Parliament (EP) provides a most-likely case for information asymmetry. Studying three elections in 11 member states, I find that the allocation of influential positions in office improves chances of reselection. The effect increases when the allocation is more selective, and when the prior uncertainty around candidacies is high. The study thus proposes a new approach to the relationship between national parties and transnational groups in the EP. It also suggests venues for research on parliamentary politics and candidate selection in general.
AltJBueno de MesquitaERoseS (2011) Disentangling accountability and competence in elections: evidence from U.S. term limits. The Journal of Politics73(1): 171–186.
2.
AshworthS (2005) Reputational dynamics and political careers. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization21(2): 441–466.
3.
AshworthS (2012) Electoral accountability: recent theoretical and empirical work. Annual Review of Political Science15(1): 183–201.
4.
AshworthSde MesquitaEB (2006) Delivering the goods: legislative particularism in different electoral and institutional settings. Journal of Politics68(1): 168–179.
5.
Austen-SmithDBanksJS (1999). Electoral accountability and incumbency. In: OrdeshookP (ed) Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 121–149.
6.
BanksJSSundaramRK (1998) Optimal retention in agency problems. Journal of Economic Theory82(2): 293–323.
7.
BarroRJ (1973) The control of politicians: an economic model. Public Choice14(1): 19–42.
8.
BerryCRHowellWG (2007) Accountability and local elections: rethinking retrospective voting. Journal of Politics69(3): 844–858.
9.
BesleyTCaseA (1995) Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics110(3): 769–798.
10.
BowlerSFarrellDM (1995) The organizing of the European parliament: committees, specialization and co-ordination. British Journal of Political Science25(2): 219–243.
11.
BowlerSFarrellDMKatzRS (1999) Party cohesion, party discipline and parliaments. In: BowlerSShaunDMKatzRS (eds) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 3–22.
12.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
13.
CoxGMcCubbinsMD (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
DaleyBSnowbergE (2009) Even if it is not bribery: the case for campaign finance reform. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization27(2): 324–349.
15.
DanielWT (2013) When the agent knows better than the principal: the effect of education and seniority on European Parliament rapporteur assignment. Journal of Common Market Studies51(5): 832–848.
16.
DaublerTHixS (2013) Ballot structure and party loyalty in European Parliament roll call votes. Draft Paper prepared for the 2103 APSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.
FearonJD (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types and sanctioning poor performance. In: PrzeworskiAStokesSCManinB (eds) Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press, pp. 55–97.
19.
FerejohnJ (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice50(1–3): 5–25.
20.
FerrazCFinanF (2011) Electoral accountability and corruption: evidence from the audits of local governments. American Economic Review101(4): 1274–1311.
21.
FiorinaMP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
FrechE (2016) Reelecting MEPs: the factors determining re-election probabilities. European Union Politics17(1): 69–90.
23.
BinghamG.PGDW (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
24.
GallagherMMarshM (1988). Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective–The Secret Garden of Politics. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
25.
GehlbachS (2013) Formal Models of Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GherghinaSChiruM (2010) Practice and payment: determinants of candidate list position in European parliament elections. European Union Politics 11(4): 533–552.
27.
GillJ (2009) Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
28.
GordonSCHuberGALandaD (2007) Challenger entry and voter learning. American Political Science Review101: 303–320.
29.
GrimmerJMessingSWestwoodSJ (2012) How words and money cultivate a personal vote: the effect of legislator credit claiming on constituent credit allocation. American Political Science Review106: 703–719.
30.
HazanRRahatG (2006). Candidate selection: methods and consequences. In: KatzRSCrottyW (Eds) Handbook of Party Politics, Vol. 4b., Chapter 17. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1545–1591.
31.
HazanRYRahatG (2000) Representation, electoral reform, and democracy: theoretical and empirical lessons from the 1996 elections in Israel. Comparative Political Studies33(10): 1310–1336.
32.
HennlA (2014) Intra-party dynamics in mixed-member electoral systems: how strategies of candidate selection impact parliamentary behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Politics26(1): 93–116.
33.
HermansenSSL (2010) Report Allocation in the European Parliament. Master’s thesis, University of Oslo.
34.
HixS (2004) Electoral institutions and legislative behavior: explaining voting defection in the European parliament. World Politics56: 194–223.
35.
HixSMarshM (2007) Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. Journal of Politics69(2): 495–510.
36.
HixSNouryARolandG (2009) Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European parliament. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B364: 821–831.
37.
HoboltSBHøylandB (2011) Selection and sanctioning in European parliamentary elections. British Journal of Political Science41: 477–498.
38.
HolmstromB (1999) Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. The Review of Economic Studies6(1): 169–182..
39.
HøylandBHoboltSHixS (2013) Career ambitions and legislative participation: the moderating effect of electoral institutions. Draft Paper presented at the 2013 EPSA conference, Barcelona.
40.
HøylandBSirkarIHixS (2009) Forum section: an automated database of the European parliament. European Union Politics10(1): 143–152.
41.
HurkaSKaedingM (2012) Report allocation in the European parliament after eastern enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy19(4): 512–529.
42.
HurkaSKaedingMObholzerL (2015) Learning on the job? EU enlargement and the assignment of (shadow) rapporteurships in the European parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies53(6): 1230–1247.
43.
JanvryA. DeFinanFSadouletE (2012) Local electoral incentives and decentralized program performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics94(3): 672–685.
44.
KeyVOCummingsMCMaassA (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
45.
KrehbielK (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
KrehbielK (1993) Where’s the party?British Journal of Political Science23(2): 235–266.
47.
KreppelA (2002) The European Parliament and Supranational Part System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
MainwaringSShugartMS (1997) Conclusion: presidentialism and the party system. In: MainwaringSShugartMS (eds) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press, pp. 394–440.
49.
MamadouhVRaunioT (2003) The committee system: powers, appointments and report allocation. Journal of Common Market Studies41(2): 333–351.
50.
MarshM (1998) Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science28: 591–607.
51.
MeserveSAPemsteinDBernhardWT (2009) Political ambition and legislative behavior in the European parliament. The Journal of Politics71: 1015–1032.
52.
NorrisP (2006) Recruitment. In: KatzRSCrottyWJ (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage Publications, pp. 89–108.
53.
PenningsPHazanRY (2001) Democratizing candidate selection: causes and consequences. Party Politics7(3): 267–275.
54.
PerssonTTabelliniG (2013) Political Economics – Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
55.
RahatGHazanRY (2001) Candidate selection methods: an analytical framework. Party Politics7(3): 297–322.
56.
RaunioT (2000) Second-rate parties? Towards a better understanding of the European Parliament’s party groups. In: HeidarKKooleR (eds) Parlimentary Party Groups in European Democracies: Political Parties behind Closed Doors. London: Routledge, pp. 231–247.
57.
ReifKSchmittH (1980) Nine second-order national elections – a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research8(1): 3–44.
58.
ScarrowSE (1997) Political career paths and the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly22(2): 253–263.
59.
ShomerY (2009) Candidate selection procedures, seniority, and vote-seeking behavior. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 945–970.
60.
SiebererU (2006) Party unity in parliamentary democracies: a comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies12(2): 150–178.
61.
SnyderJMStrombergD (2010) Press coverage and political accountability. Journal of Political Economy118(2): 355–408.
62.
StrømK (1998) Parliamentary committees in European democracies. In: LongleyLDDavidsonRH (eds) New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. London and Portland: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd, pp. 21–99.
63.
Van ThommeJRingeNVictorJN (2015) Explaining reelection in the European elections 2014. Expertise, inuence and intergroups. In: KaedingMSwitekN (eds) Die Europawahl 2014. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp. 335–344.
64.
WebbPFarrellDHollidayI (2002) Political Parties in Advanced Industrical Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
WhitakerR (2011) The European Parliament’s Committees: National Party Influence and Legislative Empowerment. London: Routledge.
66.
YordanovaN (2009) The rationale behind committee assignment in the European Parliament: distributive, informational and partisan perspectives. European Union Politics10(2): 253–280.
67.
YordanovaN (2011a) The European parliament: in need of a theory. European Union Politics12(4): 597–617.
68.
YordanovaN (2011b) Inter-institutional rules and division of power in the European parliament: allocation of consultation and co-decision reports. West European Politics34(1): 97–121.
69.
YoshinakaAMcElroyGBowlerS (2010) The appointment of rapporteurs in the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly35(4): 457–486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
