Drawing on a content analysis of discourse surrounding five sequential hospital merger decisions, this research examines the role of efficiency considerations, fashion and politics in stimulating the adoption of a managerial idea. The article analyses how different arguments come to be intertwined. It illustrates how rational and institutional arguments are used to legitimate political strategies while simultaneously constituting the apparatus of legitimation for others in a reciprocal process that contributes to the persistence of those same strategies. The article thus confirms the key role of politics, interests and agency in the evolution and constitution of institutions, and in the diffusion of managerial ideas.
Abrahamson, E. (1991) ‘Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations’ , Academy of Management Review16(3): 586-612 .
2.
Abrahamson, E. (1996) ‘Management Fashion’ , Academy of Management Review21(1): 254-285 .
3.
Arndt, M. and Bigelow, B. (1995) ‘The Adoption of Corporate Restructuring by Hospitals’ , Journal of Healthcare Management40(3): 332-347 .
4.
Arndt, M. and Bigelow, B. (2000) ‘Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals’ Use of Impression Management’ , Administrative Science Quarterly45(3): 494-522 .
5.
Benson, J. K. (1975) ‘The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy’ , Administrative Science Quarterly20(2): 229-249 .
6.
Bigelow, B. and Arndt, M. (2000) ‘The More Things Change, the More they Stay the Same’ , Health Care Management Review25(1): 65-72 .
7.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF) (2002) Myth: Bigger is Always Better When It Comes to Hospital Mergers. Ottawa: CHSRF .
8.
Colón, G. , Gupta, A. and Mango, P. (1999) ‘M & A Malpractice’ , The McKinsey Quarterly1: 62-77 .
9.
Comtois, E. (2001) ‘ Étude du discours de fusion dans les hopitaux québécois: un choix efficient ou une mode managériale?’ [‘A Study of Merger Discourse among Quebec Hospitals: Efficient Choice or Managerial Fashion?’], master’s dissertation (MBA), Université du Québec á Montréal.
10.
Crozier, M. and Thoenig, J.-C. (1976) ‘The Regulation of Complex Organized Systems’ , Administrative Science Quarterly21: 547-570 .
11.
Denis, J.-L. , Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (1999) ‘The Struggle to Implement Teaching Hospital Mergers’ , Canadian Public Administration42(3): 285-311 .
12.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988) ‘Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds) Institutional Patterns and Organizations, pp. 3-32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
13.
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’ , American Sociological Review48: 147-160 .
14.
Dranove, D. and Shanley, M. (1995) ‘Cost Reductions or Reputation Enhancement as Motives for Mergers: The Logic of Multihospital Systems’ , Strategic Management Journal16: 55-74 .
15.
Feldman, M. S. and March, J. G. (1981) ‘Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol’ , Administrative Science Quarterly26(2): 171-186 .
16.
Given, R. S. (1996) ‘Economies of Scale and Scope as an Explanation of Merger and Output Diversification Activities in the Health Maintenance Organization Industry’ , Journal of Health Economics15: 685-713 .
17.
Greenwood, R. , Suddaby, R. and Hinings, C. R. (2002) ‘Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutional Fields’ , Academy of Management Journal45(1): 58-80 .
18.
Kitchener, M. (2002) ‘Mobilizing the Logic of Managerialism in Professional Fields: The Case of Academic Health Center Mergers’ , Organization Studies23(3): 391-420 .
19.
Lee, S.-Y. and Alexander, J. A. (1999) ‘Consequences of Organizational Change in U.S. Hospitals’ , Medical Care Research and Review56(3): 227-276 .
20.
Markham, B. and Lomas, J. (1995) ‘Review of the Multi-hospital Arrangements Literature: Benefits, Disadvantages and Lessons for Implementation’ , Healthcare Management Forum8(3): 24-33 .
21.
Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structures as Myth and Ceremony’ , American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340-363 .
22.
Mintzberg, H. , Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998) Strategy Safari. New York: Free Press .
23.
Oliver, C. (1992) ‘The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization’ , Organization Studies13: 563-588 .
24.
Pfeffer, J. (1972) ‘Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence’ , Administrative Science Quarterly17(3): 382-394 .
25.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978) External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row .
26.
Rogers, E. M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovation, 2nd edn.New York: Free Press .
27.
Scott, R. W. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
28.
Sherer, P. D. and Lee, K. (2002) ‘Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective’ , Academy of Management Journal45(1): 102-119 .
29.
Snail, T. S. and Robinson, J. C. (1998) ‘Organizational Diversification in the American Hospital’ , Annual Review of Public Health19: 417-453 .
30.
Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1983) ‘Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935’ , Administrative Science Quarterly28: 22-39 .
31.
Tolbert, P. S. and Zucker, L. G. (1996) ‘The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory’, in S. Clegg , C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) The Handbook of Organization Studies, pp. 175-190. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
32.
Townley, B. (2002) ‘The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change’ , Academy of Management Journal45: 163-179 .
33.
Trautwein, F. (1990) ‘Mergers Motives and Merger Prescriptions’ , Strategic Management Journal11: 283-295 .
34.
Weick, K. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. New York: Random House .
35.
Yin, R. K. (1994) Case Study Research, 2nd edn.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
