Despite the rising literature on data mining (DM) approaches, there is a lack of a complete literature review and categorization system within risk research. This paper presents the first recognized academic literature review on the application of data mining tools in risk research provides an up-to-date SCOPUS literature database. Based on bibliometric analysis, 5422 papers related torisk were identified from a total of 77,410 studies on data mining and thoroughly analyzed. Each of the selected 5422 papers was classified into four risk categories: global risk, public health risk, molecular and biomedical risk, and pharmaceutical risk. Each primary risk category was further subdivided to highlight the specific research focuses within each domain. Global risks encompass business, environmental, and social risks. Scholars have predominantly focused on the banking, market, and construction sectors within business risk, while environmental risk includes catastrophe-related risks. Social risks encompass areas such as education, traffic safety, and transportation concerns. Clinical data is usually employed in public health risk research, while various radiomic databases are utilized in genetic and molecular biology research. In pharmaceutical research, DM is primarily used to detect adverse drug effects. According to the findings of this review, the fields of computer science and medicine received the most significant research attention. The review also discusses limitations and provides a roadmap to guide future research, aiming to enhance knowledge development related to the application of data mining techniques in risk-related studies.
PowerM. The risk management of everything. The Journal of Risk Finance2004; 5: 58–65. www.icaew.co.uk/centre.
2.
Al QubtanTRGanPTHadiFSA, et al.Practical risk management approaches among small and Medium enterprises. TEM Journal2021; 10: 996–1004.
3.
HardingJAShahbazMSrinivasS, et al.Data mining in manufacturing: A review. J Manuf Sci Eng2006; 128: 969–976.
4.
PrinslooJSinhaSvon SolmsB. A review of industry 4.0 manufacturing process security risks. Applied Sciences (Switzerland)2019; 9: 5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235105
5.
ImranRUllahKAliZ,et al.A multi-criteria group decision-making approach for robot selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and Aczel-Alsina Bonferroni means. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications2024; 1: 1–32.
6.
HutchinsMJBhingeRMicaliMK, et al.Framework for identifying cybersecurity risks in manufacturing. In: Procedia Manuf,2015; 1: 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.060
7.
WeeserikBPSpruitM. Improving Operational Risk Management using Business Performance Management technologies. Sustainability (Switzerland)2018; 10: 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030640
8.
ZoghiFS. Risk management practices and SMEs: An empirical study on Turkish SMEs. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance2017; 8: 123–127.
9.
TupaJSimotaJSteinerF. Aspects of risk management implementation for industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf2017; 11: 1223–1230.
10.
Weltwirtschaftsforum. Zurich Insurance Group, Global risks 2019: Insight report, n.d.
11.
The Global Risks Report 2023. 18th Edition, 2023. www.weforum.org.
12.
TsaiHH. Global data mining: An empirical study of current trends, future forecasts and technology diffusions. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 8172–8181.
13.
AmaniFAFadlallaAM. Data mining applications in accounting: A review of the literature and organizing framework. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems2017; 24: 32–58.
14.
HristidisVChenSCLiT, et al.Survey of data management and analysis in disaster situations. Journal of Systems and Software2010; 83: 1701–1714.
15.
SilwattananusarnT. Data mining and its applications for knowledge management: A literature review from 2007 to 2012. International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process2012; 2: 13–24.
16.
DeshpandeSPThakareVM. Data mining system and applications: A review. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems2010; 1: 32–44.
17.
BartschatAReischlMMikutR. Data mining tools. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov2019; 9: e1309. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1309
18.
JainAKMurtyMNFlynnPJ. Data Clustering: A Review, 2000.
19.
SaxenaAPrasadMGuptaA, et al.A Review of Clustering Techniques and Developments, n.d.
KesavarajGSukumaranS. A study on classification techniques in data mining, 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Tiruchengode, India, 2013, pp. 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2013.6726842.
22.
NieGRoweWZhangL, et al.Credit card churn forecasting by logistic regression and decision tree. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38: 15273–15285.
23.
ChangLYChenWC. Data mining of tree-based models to analyze freeway accident frequency. J Safety Res2005; 36: 365–375.
24.
ZdravkovićMKorunovićN. Novel methodology for real-time structural analysis assistance in custom product design. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering2023; 21: 293–305.
25.
SahooSKChoudhuryBB. Autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance in smart robotic wheelchairs. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing2024; 4: 47–66.
26.
KotsiantisSKanellopoulosD. Association rules mining: A recent overview. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering2006; 32: 71–82.
27.
GhafariSMTjortjisC. A survey on association rules mining using heuristics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov2019; 9: e1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1307
28.
LiaoSHChuPHHsiaoPY. Data mining techniques and applications - A decade review from 2000 to 2011. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 11303–11311.
GhorbaniRGhousiR. Predictive data mining approaches in medical diagnosis: A review of some diseases prediction. International Journal of Data and Network Science2019; 3: 47–70.
NgaiEWTXiuLChauDCK. Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification. Expert Syst Appl2009; 36: 2592–2602.
41.
HassaniHHuangXSilvaES,et al.A review of data mining applications in crime. Stat Anal Data Min2016; 9: 139–154.
42.
MucherinoAPapajorgjiPPardalosPM. A survey of data mining techniques applied to agriculture. Operational Research2009; 9: 121–140.
ChaudhariARaghvendra JoshiRProfessorA, et al.Bibliometric Survey on Incremental Clustering Algorithms, 2019.
45.
KameshwaranKMalarvizhiK. Survey on Clustering Techniques in Data Mining, n.d. www.ijcsit.com.
46.
PhyuTN. Survey of classification techniques in data mining. In: Proceedings of the international MultiConference of engineers and computer scientists 2009 vol I IMECS 2009, march 18-20, 2009.Hong Kong: Newswood Ltd., 2009, p. 2210.
AbiodunOIJantanAOmolaraAE, et al.State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey. Heliyon2018; 4: e00938.
50.
FuT. A review on time series data mining. Eng Appl Artif Intell2011; 24: 164–181.
51.
TsaiCWLaiCFChiangMC,et al.Data mining for internet of things: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials2014; 16: 77–97.
52.
MartensDBaesensBFawcettT. Editorial survey: Swarm intelligence for data mining. Mach Learn2011; 82: 1–42.
53.
GhadgeADaniSKalawskyR. Supply chain risk management present and future scope. International Journal of Logistics Management2012; 23: 313–339.
54.
TranTHDobrovnikMKummerS. Supply chain risk assessment: A content analysis-based literature review. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management2018; 31: 562–591.
55.
EvisonDCKremerPDGuiverJ. Mass timber construction in Australia and New Zealand-status, and economic and environmental influences on adoption. Wood and Fiber Science2018; 50: 128–138.
56.
KilubiI. Investigating current paradigms in supply chain risk management – a bibliometric study. Business Process Management Journal2016; 22: 662–692.
57.
SahooSKChoudhuryBBDhalPR. A bibliometric analysis of material selection using MCDM methods: Trends and insights. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research2024; 1: 189–205.
58.
PournaderMKachATalluriS. A review of the existing and emerging topics in the supply chain risk management literature. Decision Sciences2020; 51: 867–919.
59.
van EckNJWaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics2010; 84: 523–538.
60.
KumarVGuYBasuS, et al.Radiomics: The process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging2012; 30: 1234–1248.
61.
HuangJSLiuHC. Object recognition using genetic algorithms with a Huang Z. Chen, H., Hsu, CJ Chen, WH and Wu, S., Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: A market comparative study. Decis Support Syst2004; 37: 543–558.
62.
BatesDWSariaSOhno-MachadoL, et al.Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. Health Aff2014; 33: 1123–1131.
63.
KuhnMCampillosMLetunicI, et al.A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Mol Syst Biol2010; 6: 343. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.98
64.
DennyJCBastaracheLRitchieMD, et al.Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data. Nat Biotechnol2013; 31: 1102–1111.
65.
MalajEVon Der OhePCGroteM, et al., Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2014; 111: 9549–9554.
66.
McleanRDPontiffJBaliT, et al.Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability? *, 2012. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156623.
67.
AsifMIshtiaqUArgyrosIK. Hamacher aggregation operators for pythagorean fuzzy set and its application in multi-attribute decision-making problem. Spectrum of Operational Research2024; 2: 27–40.
68.
Ali Abd-alrazaqAAlhuwailDHousehM, et al.Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: Infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: 10–2196.
69.
ThayyibPVMamillaRKhanM, et al.State-of-the-art of artificial intelligence and big data analytics reviews in five different domains: A bibliometric summary. Sustainability (Switzerland)2023; 15: 4026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054026
70.
Rojas-LamorenaÁJDel Barrio-GarcíaSAlcántara-PilarJM. A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: A bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling. J Bus Res2022; 139: 1067–1083.
71.
Nájera-SánchezJJOrtiz-de-Urbina-CriadoMMora-ValentínEM. Mapping value co-creation literature in the technology and innovation management field: A bibliographic coupling analysis. Front Psychol2020; 11: 588648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648
72.
HongHPanahiMShirzadiA, et al.Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Science of the Total Environment2018; 621: 1124–1141.
73.
ChengCWLinCCSen LeuS. Use of association rules to explore cause-effect relationships in occupational accidents in the Taiwan construction industry. Saf Sci2010; 48: 436–444.
74.
HongHTsangaratosPIliaI, et al.Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang county, China. Science of the Total Environment2018; 625: 575–588.
75.
ChengCWSen LeuSChengYM, et al.Applying data mining techniques to explore factors contributing to occupational injuries in Taiwan’s construction industry. Accid Anal Prev2012; 48: 214–222.
76.
ChenWPourghasemiHRPanahiM, et al.Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology2017; 297: 69–85.
77.
HarutyunyanHKhachatrianHKaleDC, et al.Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data. Sci Data2019; 6: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0103-9
78.
SunJLangJFujitaH,et al.Imbalanced enterprise credit evaluation with DTE-SBD: Decision tree ensemble based on SMOTE and bagging with differentiated sampling rates. Inf Sci (N Y)2018; 425: 76–91.
79.
AburrousMHossainMADahalK,et al.Intelligent phishing detection system for e-banking using fuzzy data mining. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37: 7913–7921.
80.
HelalSLiJLiuL, et al.Predicting academic performance by considering student heterogeneity. Knowl Based Syst2018; 161: 134–146.
81.
NandanMGhoshD. Pre-owned car price prediction by employing machine learning techniques. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing2023; 3: 167–184.
82.
BarakatNBradleyAPBarakatMNH. Intelligible support vector machines for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine2010; 14: 1114–1120.
83.
KimMJHanI. The discovery of experts’ decision rules from qualitative bankruptcy data using genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl2003; 25: 637–646.
84.
MoroSCortezPRitaP. Business intelligence in banking: A literature analysis from 2002 to 2013 using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation. Expert Syst Appl2015; 42: 1314–1324.
85.
PlantCTeipelSJOswaldA, et al.Automated detection of brain atrophy patterns based on MRI for the prediction of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage2010; 50: 162–174.
86.
KizielewiczBSałabunW. SITW Method: A new approach to Re-identifying multi-criteria weights in Complex decision analysis. Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research2024; 1: 215–226.
87.
WeiC-PChiuI-T. Turning telecommunications call details to churn prediction: A data mining approach, (n.d.). www.elsevier.com/locate/eswa.
88.
YooIAlafaireetPMarinovM, et al.Data mining in healthcare and biomedicine: A survey of the literature. J Med Syst2012; 36: 2431–2448.
89.
ZhangKWuXNiuR, et al.The assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and decision tree methods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Environ Earth Sci2017; 76: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6731-5
90.
LeeSKimJCJungHS, et al.Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea, geomatics. Natural Hazards and Risk2017; 8: 1185–1203.
91.
CoreyKMKashyapSLorenziE, et al.Development and validation of machine learning models to identify high-risk surgical patients using automatically curated electronic health record data (Pythia): A retrospective, single-site study. PLoS Med2018; 15: e1002701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002701
92.
ChiccoDJurmanG. Machine learning can predict survival of patients with heart failure from serum creatinine and ejection fraction alone. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2020; 20: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1023-5
93.
MohrDCZhangMSchuellerSM. CP13CH02-Mohr ARI 4 April 2017 15:40 personal sensing: Understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol2017; 13: 23–47.
94.
DoupePFaghmousJBasuS. Machine learning for health services researchers. Value in Health2019; 22: 808–815.
95.
MengXHHuangYXRaoDP, et al.Comparison of three data mining models for predicting diabetes or prediabetes by risk factors. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences2013; 29: 93–99.
96.
ShahDPatelSBhartiSK. Heart disease prediction using machine learning techniques. SN Comput Sci2020; 1: 45.
97.
UddinSKhanAHossainME,et al.Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2019; 19: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8
98.
RazavianNBleckerSSchmidtAM, et al.Population-level prediction of type 2 diabetes from claims data and analysis of risk factors. Big Data2015; 3: 277–287.
99.
MortazaviBJDowningNSBucholzEM, et al.Analysis of machine learning techniques for heart failure readmissions. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2016; 9: 629–640.
100.
TomasevicNGvozdenovicNVranesS. An overview and comparison of supervised data mining techniques for student exam performance prediction. Comput Educ2020; 143: 103676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103676
101.
ElraaidUBadiIBouraimaMB. Identifying and addressing obstacles to project management office success in construction projects: An AHP approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications2024; 1: 33–45.
102.
PławiakPAbdarMRajendra AcharyaU. Application of new deep genetic cascade ensemble of SVM classifiers to predict the Australian credit scoring. Applied Soft Computing Journal2019; 84: 105740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105740
103.
HuYHLoCLShihSP. Developing early warning systems to predict students’ online learning performance. Comput Human Behav2014; 36: 469–478.
104.
HuangZChenHHsuCJ, et al.Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: A market comparative study. Decis Support Syst2004; 37: 543–558.
105.
KaraolisMAMoutirisJAHadjipanayiD,et al.Assessment of the risk factors of coronary heart events based on data mining with decision trees. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine2010; 14: 559–566.
106.
ZhangFFleyehHWangX,et al.Construction site accident analysis using text mining and natural language processing techniques. Autom Constr2019; 99: 238–248.
107.
OnanAKorukoğluSBulutH. A multiobjective weighted voting ensemble classifier based on differential evolution algorithm for text sentiment classification. Expert Syst Appl2016; 62: 1–16.
108.
WuHYangSHuangZ, et al.Type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction model based on data mining. Inform Med Unlocked2018; 10: 100–107.
109.
LotermanGBrownIMartensD, et al.Benchmarking regression algorithms for loss given default modeling. Int J Forecast2012; 28: 161–170.
110.
FinlayS. Multiple classifier architectures and their application to credit risk assessment. Eur J Oper Res2011; 210: 368–378.
111.
DelenD. A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management. Decis Support Syst2010; 49: 498–506.
112.
OdlumMYoonS. What can we learn about the Ebola outbreak from tweets?Am J Infect Control2015; 43: 563–571.
SantillanaMNguyenATDredzeM, et al.Combining search, social media, and traditional data sources to improve influenza surveillance. PLoS Comput Biol2015; 11: e1004513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004513
115.
YehIChui LienC. The comparisons of data mining techniques for the predictive accuracy of probability of default of credit card clients. Expert Syst Appl2009; 36: 2473–2480.
116.
YapBWOngSHHusainNHM. Using data mining to improve assessment of credit worthiness via credit scoring models. Expert Syst Appl2011; 38: 13274–13283.
117.
CzernyMEggebrechtHSodeckG, et al.Mechanisms of Symptomatic Spinal Cord Ischemia After TEVAR: Insights From the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications (EuREC), 2012. www.jevt.org.
118.
MelilloPDe LucaNBracaleM,et al.Classification tree for risk assessment in patients suffering from congestive heart failure via long-term heart rate variability. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform2013; 17: 727–733.
119.
VermaLSrivastavaSNegiPC. A Hybrid data mining model to predict coronary artery disease cases using non-invasive clinical data. J Med Syst2016; 40, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0536-z
120.
PohCQXUbeynarayanaCUGohYM. Safety leading indicators for construction sites: A machine learning approach. Autom Constr2018; 93: 375–386.
121.
MelilloPIzzoROrricoA, et al.Automatic prediction of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events using heart rate variability analysis. PLoS One2015; 10: e0118504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118504
122.
TixierAJPHallowellMRRajagopalanB,et al.Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports. Autom Constr2016; 62: 45–56.
123.
ShiQAbdel-AtyM. Big data applications in real-time traffic operation and safety monitoring and improvement on urban expressways. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol2015; 58: 380–394.
124.
WeiWLiJCaoL, et al.Effective detection of sophisticated online banking fraud on extremely imbalanced data. World Wide Web2013; 16: 449–475.
125.
HongHPradhanBXuC,et al.Spatial prediction of landslide hazard at the Yihuang area (China) using two-class kernel logistic regression, alternating decision tree and support vector machines. Catena (Amst)2015; 133: 266–281.
126.
DarabiHChoubinBRahmatiO, et al.Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques. J Hydrol (Amst)2019; 569: 142–154.
127.
DouJYunusAPTien BuiD, et al.Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan. Science of the Total Environment2019; 662: 332–346.
128.
ErenerAMutluASebnem DüzgünH. A comparative study for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), logistic regression (LR) and association rule mining (ARM). Eng Geol2016; 203: 45–55.
129.
ChangLYWangHW. Analysis of traffic injury severity: An application of non-parametric classification tree techniques. Accid Anal Prev2006; 38: 1019–1027.
130.
PendharkarPCSubramanianGHRodgerJA. A probabilistic model for predicting software development effort. IEEE Transactions On Software Engineering2005; 31: 615–624. http://www.agena.
131.
MontellaAAriaMD’AmbrosioA,et al.Analysis of powered two-wheeler crashes in Italy by classification trees and rules discovery. Accid Anal Prev2012; 49: 58–72.
132.
NateghiRGuikemaSDQuiringSM. Comparison and validation of statistical methods for predicting power outage durations in the event of hurricanes. Risk Analysis2011; 31: 1897–1906.
133.
KrugerHAKearneyWD. A prototype for assessing information security awareness. Comput Secur2006; 25: 289–296.
134.
WornerSPGevreyM. Modelling global insect pest species assemblages to determine risk of invasion. Journal of Applied Ecology2006; 43: 858–867.
135.
PengYZhangYTangY,et al.An incident information management framework based on data integration, data mining, and multi-criteria decision making. Decis Support Syst2011; 51: 316–327.
136.
HeMe SousaLRMirandaT,et al.Rockburst laboratory tests database - application of data mining techniques. Eng Geol2015; 185: 116–130.
137.
EnkeDThawornwongS. The use of data mining and neural networks for forecasting stock market returns. Expert Syst Appl2005; 29: 927–940.
138.
ThawornwongSEnkeD. The adaptive selection of financial and economic variables for use with artificial neural networks. Neurocomputing2004; 56: 205–232.
139.
OreskiSOreskiG. Genetic algorithm-based heuristic for feature selection in credit risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl2014; 41: 2052–2064.
140.
OreskiSOreskiDOreskiG. Hybrid system with genetic algorithm and artificial neural networks and its application to retail credit risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 12605–12617.
141.
YazdiAKKomasiH. Best practice performance of COVID-19 in America continent with artificial intelligence. Spectrum of Operational Research2024; 1: 1–12.
142.
MziliTMziliIRiffiME, et al.Hybrid genetic and penguin search optimization algorithm (GA-PSEOA) for efficient flow shop scheduling solutions. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering2024; 22: 077–100.
143.
NobaneeHDilshadMNAl DhanhaniM, et al.Big data applications the banking sector: A bibliometric analysis approach. Sage Open2021; 11: 21582440211067234. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211067234
144.
NgaiEWTHuYWongYH, et al.The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decis Support Syst2011; 50: 559–569.
145.
PatrícioLDFerreiraJJ. Blockchain security research: Theorizing through bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of Advances in Management Research2021; 18: 1–35.
146.
LuYZhangJ. Bibliometric analysis and critical review of the research on big data in the construction industry, engineering. Construction and Architectural Management2022; 29: 3574–3592.
147.
InjadatMNSaloFNassifAB. Data mining techniques in social media: A survey. Neurocomputing2016; 214: 654–670.
WuCLeiHYanX,et al.Data Mining for Bibliometric Analysis of Traffic Flow, n.d.
150.
KhaliliSBreyerC. Review on 100% renewable energy system analyses - A bibliometric perspective. IEEE Access2022; 10: 125792–125834.
151.
DuggiralaHJTonningJMSmithE, et al.Use of data mining at the food and drug administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association2016; 23: 428–434.
152.
AzeemMJamilMK. Constant partition dimension of different anticancer drug structures. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications2024; 1: 64–83.
153.
JonesJK. The role of data mining technology in the identification of signals of possible adverse drug reactions: Value and limitations. Current Therapeutic Research2001; 62: 664–672.
154.
HaubenMMadiganDGerritsCM, et al.The role of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Expert Opin Drug Saf2005; 4: 929–948.
155.
WilsonAMThabaneLHolbrookA. Application of data mining techniques in pharmacovigilance. Br J Clin Pharmacol2004; 57: 127–134.
156.
ItaniSLecronFFortempsP. Specifics of Medical Data Mining for Diagnosis Aid: A Survey, n.d.
157.
MomeniZHassanzadehESaniee AbadehM,et al.A survey on single and multi omics data mining methods in cancer data classification. J Biomed Inform2020; 107: 103466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103466
158.
FilippiAMocanuMM. Mining TCGA Database for genes with prognostic value in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci2023; 24: 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021622
159.
HuangHCaiXLinJ, et al.A novel five-gene metabolism-related risk signature for predicting prognosis and immune infiltration in endometrial cancer: A TCGA data mining. Comput Biol Med2023; 155: 106632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106632
160.
CabiatiMGagginiMDe SimoneP,et al.Data mining of key genes expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: Novel potential biomarkers of diagnosis prognosis or progression. Clin Exp Metastasis2022; 39: 589–602.
161.
MunimZHDushenkoMJimenezVJ, et al.Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Maritime Policy and Management2020; 47: 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1788731
