The use and application of natural fibers and their composites have garnered increasing attention due to their sustainability and environmental friendliness. This study investigates the after-impact and after-repair compressive and flexural behaviors of flax and cotton fiber reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) laminates (FFRP and CoFRP), along with their sandwich structures incorporating balsa wood cores. For comparison, glass fiber reinforced PLA (GFRP) and its sandwich structures were also evaluated. All composites used thermoplastic PLA as the matrix and were repaired through a heat-press method. Most FRP laminates and their sandwich counterparts exhibited good repair effectiveness, with compressive and flexural strengths largely restored to over 80% after repair. While GFRP and its sandwich structures maintained the highest overall performance, FFRP and CoFRP demonstrated comparable after-impact and after-repair behaviors. Notably, CoFRP exhibits lower modulus and strength but higher fracture energy than FFRP (1.18 kJ/m2 vs 0.49 kJ/m2), contributing to its improved toughness. Given their reasonable repairability and sustainable material base, natural fiber-reinforced PLA composites are considered viable for secondary structural applications where moderate impact resistance and environmental considerations are primary concerns.
HowarthJMareddySSRMativengaPT. Energy intensity and environmental analysis of mechanical recycling of carbon fibre composite. J Clean Prod2014; 81: 46–50.
4.
AsmatuluETwomeyJOvercashM. Recycling of fiber-reinforced composites and direct structural composite recycling concept. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 593–608.
5.
AshikKSharmaRS. A review on mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites. J Miner Mater Char Eng2015; 03: 420–426.
6.
RangappaSMSiengchinSDhakalHN. Green-composites: ecofriendly and sustainability. Appl Sci Eng Prog2020; 13: 183–184.
7.
PorrasAMaranonA. Development and characterization of a laminate composite material from polylactic acid (PLA) and woven bamboo fabric. Compos B Eng2012; 43: 2782–2788.
8.
KarimahARidhoMRMunawarSS, et al.A review on natural fibers for development of eco-friendly bio-composite: characteristics, and utilizations. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 2442–2458.
9.
Brink RpeM. Plant resources of South-East Asia. Backhuys Publisher, 2003.
10.
OksmanKBengtssonM. Wood fibre thermoplastic composites: processing, properties and future developments. Handbook of engineering biopolymers: Homopolymers, blends and composites. Hanser Publisher, 2007, pp. 655–671.
11.
KuHWangHPattarachaiyakoopN, et al.A review on the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos B Eng2011; 42: 856–873.
12.
JoshiSVDrzalLMohantyA, et al.Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?Compos Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 371–376.
13.
ZhangYLiYMaH, et al.Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 88: 172–177.
14.
AlomayriTAssaediHShaikhF, et al.Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of cotton fabric-reinforced geopolymer composites. J Asian Ceram Soc2014; 2: 223–230.
15.
BalajiVSVK. Mechanical characterization of coir fiber and cotton fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester composites for packaging applications. J Appl Packag Res2017; 9: 2.
16.
SinghJIPSinghSDhawanV, et al.Flax fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites for non-structural engineering applications: effect of molding temperature and fiber volume fraction on its mechanical properties. Polym Polym Compos2021; 29: S780–S789.
17.
BiswasDDasSMohantoS, et al.Extraction, modification, and characterization of natural polymers used in transdermal drug delivery system: an updated review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res2020; 13: 10–20.
18.
SilvaACSilvestreAJVilelaC, et al.Natural polymers-based materials: a contribution to a greener future. Molecules2022; 27: 94.
19.
AurasRALimL-TSelkeSE, et al.Poly (lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing, and applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
20.
KhouriNGBahúJOBlanco-LlameroC, et al.Polylactic acid (PLA): properties, synthesis, and biomedical applications – a review of the literature. J Mol Struct2024; 1309: 138243.
21.
SharmaSKMudhooA. A handbook of applied biopolymer technology: synthesis, degradation and applications. Royal society of chemistry, 2011.
22.
BarouniALuptonCJiangC, et al.Investigation into the fatigue properties of flax fibre epoxy composites and hybrid composites based on flax and glass fibres. Compos Struct2022; 281: 115046.
23.
RajeshkumarGArvindh SeshadriSDevnaniG, et al.Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites–A comprehensive review. J Clean Prod2021; 310: 127483.
24.
OksmanKSkrifvarsMSelinJ-F. Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1317–1324.
GalosJDasRSutcliffeMP, et al.Review of Balsa core sandwich composite structures. Mater Des2022; 221: 111013.
28.
BaranIWeijermarsW. Residual bending behaviour of sandwich composites after impact. J Sandw Struct Mater2020; 22: 402–422.
29.
TsaiS-NTsaiS-L. Flexure-after-impact behaviors of green composite sandwich beams with natural fiber facesheets and balsa cores. J Sandw Struct Mater2025; 27: 51–70.
30.
PanciroliRGianniniO. Comparing the impact resistance of flax/epoxy and glass/epoxy composites through experiments and numerical simulations. Compos Struct2021; 264: 113750.
31.
Chithra DeviRGirimuruganRNanthakumarS, et al.Experimental study of mechanical properties of Sisal/banana fiber hybrid sandwich composite. Mater Today Proc2022; 68: 1793–1799.
32.
WangHRamakrishnanKRShankarK. Experimental study of the medium velocity impact response of sandwich panels with different cores. Mater Des2016; 99: 68–82.
33.
MegueniALousdadA. Comparison of symmetrical double sided and stepped patches for repairing cracked metallic structures. Compos Struct2008; 85: 91–94.
34.
AlzeanidiNGhasemnejadH. Analysis of the effect of impact damage on the repairability of composite panels. Compos Struct2017; 176: 304–312.
35.
HsiehT-HWangI-HHuangY-S, et al.Repairing damaged composite laminates using carbon fiber reinforced bulk mold compound. Mod Phys Lett B2023; 37: 2340029.
36.
BhatiaGSHejjajiAComerAJ. Post impact repair of in-situ polymerisable thermoplastic based carbon fibre composite and its assessment under compression after impact loading. Compos B Eng2024; 283: 111687.
37.
JavanshourFPrapavesisAPournooriN, et al.Impact and fatigue tolerant natural fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites by using non-dry fibres. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2022; 161: 107110.
38.
ChoiYC. Hydration and internal curing properties of plant-based natural fiber-reinforced cement composites. Case Stud Constr Mater2022; 17: e01690.
39.
BerkowitzCKJohnsonWS. Fracture and fatigue tests and analysis of composite sandwich structure. J Compos Mater2005; 39: 1417–1431.
40.
CantwellWScudamoreRRatcliffeJ, et al.Interfacial fracture in sandwich laminates. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 2079–2085.
41.
SaidaneEHScidaDPacM-J, et al.Mode-I interlaminar fracture toughness of flax, glass and hybrid flax-glass fibre woven composites: failure mechanism evaluation using acoustic emission analysis. Polym Test2019; 75: 246–253.
